home | fotoalbum | stats | gelinkt door | beheer | maak je eigen weblog aan! | 5 EURO bij aanmelding. 1 EURO per 2 vrienden. X EURO per bericht. punt.nl

 

Gratis pokeren
Everest Poker | 19 Juni 2005 | 21:01:54
Everest Poker
Speciaal voor echte beginners de lekkerste poker website om te spelen, heel mooi grafisch opgezet, met als grootste voordeel een volledig Nederlandstalige website met een zeer goede ook Nederlandstalige support afdeling en zeer regelmatig grote bonussen. Om te beginnen geven ze je 100 % van je eerste inleg terug wat ons betreft een absolute aanrader en als je er nog niet speelt moet je het zeker doen. Vooral op de zondagmorgen zo rond een uurtje of  9 à 10 is het vreselijk binnenslepen om alle vet beschonken Amerikanen te plukken . Zelfs pokerspelers die vrij nieuw zijn in het spelletje lukt dit erg gemakkelijk.
 
bewerk | geef kudos | verstuur | kopieer

Bodog Releases Odds on the World Series of Poker
UNITED STATES – (PRESS RELEASE) -- Not only has leading online gambling site Bodog.com qualified over 70 players for the World Series of Poker, now Bodog offers the most comprehensive and up-to-date odds on the WSOP.

Bodog.com's oddsmakers favor poker superstars Phil Ivey and Daniel Negreanu at 200/1. They are followed by top players Phil Hellmuth, Howard Lederer, Gus Hansen, Chris Ferguson and Erick Lindgren at 225/1.

"With the incredible growth of poker, our players have been clamoring for wagers on the WSOP, " said Calvin Ayre, Founder and CEO of Bodog.com. "It really brings together two of our great strengths – event wagering and poker."

Bodog.com is poised to make a big splash at the 2005 World Series of Poker. In addition to fielding the 70-member Team Bodog and offering odds, the site will host the Bodog Poker & Sports Marketing Conference in Las Vegas on July 6 th and 7 th. The conference will culminate with an exciting party at Rain nightclub. Sports and poker luminaries expected to attend the conference include Reggie Jackson, Mike Ditka, Daniel Negreanu, WSOP tournament director Matt Savage, and more.

  door: 2005-06-24 17:49:43

5 EURO bij aanmelding. 1 EURO per 2 vrienden. X EURO per bericht.
World Series of Poker set for August
The World Series of Poker television series on ESPN will begin Aug. 23 and run weekly through Nov. 15.

The first 14 telecasts will offer reports on tournaments played June 5-6, 10-12, 14-15, 16-22, 24-25, 26-28 and 29-30 in the Rio Casino-Hotel Resort in Las Vegas.

The final 12 shows, starting Oct. 11, will report on what happened in the $10,000 buy-in WSOP championship tournament, which runs July 7-15.

The TV schedule:

Aug. 23 - $1,500 no-limit hold'em tournament, which attracted a record 2,304 players;

Aug. 23 - $1,500 limit hold'em tournament.

Aug. 30 - $1,000 no-limit hold'em, with rebuys.

Aug. 30 - $2,000 no-limit hold'em.

Sept. 6 - $2,000 pot-limit hold'em.

Sept. 6 - $2,000 pot-limit Omaha, with rebuys.

Sept. 13 - $5,000 no-limit hold'em.

Sept. 13 - $5,000 pot-limit hold'em.

Sept. 20 - $1,500 no-limit hold'em.

Sept. 20 - $5,000 seven-card stud.

Sept. 27 - $2,500 no-limit hold'em.

Sept. 27 - $5,000 pot-limit Omaha, with rebuys.

Oct. 4 - $5,000 limit hold'em.

Oct. 4 - $2,000 no-limit hold'em.

Oct. 11-Nov. 15 - The $10,000 buy-in World Series of Poker Championship tournament, which is expected to attract 6,600 players and generate a prize pool in excess of $60 million. Which would mean a possible first-place payoff of $10 million.

  door: 2005-06-24 17:50:28

Floridian Takes First WSOP Bracelet

June 23, 2005
Earl Burton
The Amazon Room at the Rio was buzzing on Wednesday night. Not only was the $1,500 No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em tournament, and its 2000 or so combatants, starting up but the twentieth event of the 2005 WSOP, the $5,000 Pot Limit Texas Hold 'Em was being contested. One of the events to be televised on ESPN, a raucous crowd surrounded the felt as the final table kicked off with the following players:

Seat 1: Joe Sebok, 159K
Seat 2: Cyndy Violette, 206K and the chip lead
Seat 3: Steven "Lucky" Liu, 193.5K
Seat 4: Brian Wilson, 193K
Seat 5: Derek LeForte, 36.5K and the short stack
Seat 6: Allen Cunningham, 131.5K
Seat 7: WPT Champion John Gale, 64.5K
Seat 8: Professional Tony Cousineau, 99.5K
Seat 9: Professional Burt Boutin, 116K

The blinds started out at a relatively low 1500/3K, so it seemed like we were going to settle in for a long evening. The action kicked in immediately, however, as on Hand 6 five players limped to see a flop of 9-7-6. Burt Boutin and Brian Wilson were the only ones to bet the turn card of a five and we went to the river. A scary Ace came on the board, and both players raised and reraised the pot until Boutin had all his chips in the center of the table. He was disgusted to see that Wilson had trapped him with an eight in his hand for the straight, defeating Burt's set of nines and sending Boutin home in ninth place.

Cyndy Violette has had an excellent 2005 Series. She has been battling with Chris Ferguson for the Player of the Year lead at this event, but has yet to capture that elusive second bracelet. She started with the chip lead, but let many of her chips go in a raising battle with Allen Cunningham until she released her hand. Then she ran up against John Gale on Hand 19. On a flop of 5-7-Q with two hearts, John pushed hard and Cyndy fought back as well. Gale got all in and they turned up their hands: K-Q for Cyndy and Ah-Jh for John. The turn was harmless, but the river ten of hearts gave the flush to John and removed Violette from the chip lead. Brian Wilson took over as the table commander.

Things calmed for a bit. On two separate occasions players were all in against an opponent, only to see both players turn up the same hands. It continued through the end of the level and we didn't lose our next player until the blinds were at 2/4K.

Joe Sebok is a name you might not recognize, but he has become somewhat famous for his dad, professional Barry Greenstein. Barry, the winner of Event #19 this year, was in the crowd as he proudly watched his son, who has only been playing for a year, battle at his first final table at the World Series.

Unfortunately, there wasn't to be a back to back father/son story to be told here. Joe found an A-J to be to his liking and, with a dwindling chip stack, chose that moment to chip leader Wilson. Wilson had woke up in the big blind with A-K, however, and when the board provided no help to Sebok he was out on Hand 72 in eighth place.

Ten hands later, Cyndy Violette was the one who was fighting for her life. She got all her chips involved in a three way pot with Allen Cunningham and Tony Cousineau and saw a flop of 4c-6c-Q. Cunningham and Cousineau both checked and, with a Queen on the turn, Allen bet the dry pot and forced Tony out. Violette turned up the nut flush draw with Ac-3c and Cunningham turned over Q-8 for a set of Queens. No club came for Cyndy on the river and she was done for the night in seventh place.

"I knew I was in trouble when there was three of us in there," Cyndy said to me afterwards. "Tony said at the table that he had been in on clubs too, so I knew it was going to be tough to get that last club on the river."

Shortly thereafter, Steven Liu said goodbye to the table. On Hand 86, "Lucky" decided to test his luck against WPT titleholder John Gale. He got his money in on the flop of Js-K-10s and turned up a pair of Jacks and a straight draw, Gale showed his nut straight draw and we saw the turn. "Lucky" wasn't to be tonight as John hit his third spade on the turn and eliminated Liu in sixth place.

One player who played tremendously through the event was the short stack beginning the night, Derek LeForte. He was able to parlay his stack from the felt to being in position to battle for the title. While everyone had more chips starting the night, Derek took his time and played excellent poker to climb up the ladder and stay in contention.

"I was playing a little loose when the tournament started," admitted Derek on a break from the action. "I always play well when I'm short stacked, so it really was a good thing for me when I found myself in that position. I simply clamped down on my game, locked in and gradually, I made my way back into things."

On Hand 120, our next victim was claimed. Tony Cousineau had been battling cold cards for the entirety of the final table and you could see the frustration in his face. When Allen Cunningham raised into him, Tony looked to see the Ac-10c and went all in. Cunningham called and turned up the Kh-10d. A big lead got a little better when the flop came down Ah-8h-4 and Tony had to be breathing a little easier. He saw the four of hearts come on the turn and, from his expression, you could see that he was dreading the river and the outcome. A fourth heart landed, laying the bad beat on Tony Cousineau as Allen Cunningham hit his miracle flush and pushed Tony out the door in fifth place.

After the dinner break, we moved up in levels again (4/8K) and the leaderboard looked like this:

Wilson 472K
Gale 404K
Cunningham 169K
LeForte 155K

It was obvious that LeForte and Cunningham were going to have to make some moves, but the chip leaders were the ones mixing it up. Gale and Wilson got involved in a huge pot on Hand 144, with Gale forcing Wilson off his hand and taking the chip lead away from Wilson.

Five hands later, Allen Cunningham's time had come. The winner of the second event of this year's Series made his move against a still-smarting Brian Wilson. After a flop of 10-4-10, Cunningham attempted to buy the pot with an all in move. Wilson debated, then called and turned up 5-4, giving him two pair. Surprisingly, Allen did not have a great starting hand as he turned up a measly K-3. No help came the rest of the way and Allen Cunningham's dream of becoming a multi-bracelet winner in this year's tournament ended with him in fourth place.

Derek LeForte's run at the championship ended on Hand 163. He had held his own at the final table and had made it from the short stack at the beginning of the night to the top three, but when he was all-in preflop with a K-9 against Brian Wilson's A-6, it was the beginning of the end. No rescue for Derek was coming and he retired from the event in third place.

It was now time for heads up action:

Gale 695K
Wilson 505K

John Gale made some great moves over the next fifteen or so hands. He continued to put pressure on Wilson, forcing his opponent out of hands and chipping away at his stack. John Gale became the first person in this year's tournament to crack the one million chip mark as he had a 10-1 advantage on Brian before the major turning point of the event.

On Hand 176, both players bet the pot furiously preflop until Gale had pushed Wilson all in. In a classic race situation, Gale turned up an A-J and Wilson showed pocket sixes. The flop was good for Brian with 8-4-7, but the turn gave John the lead when a Jack hit. Wilson was down to six outs for his tournament life when the miracle five hit the river, sending the crowd into hysterics and an excited Wilson back into the game.

The very next hand, the two clashed again. Once again, Gale got Wilson to commit his entire stack and had to be pleased when he turned up his pocket tens against Wilson's pocket fours. The crowd had barely calmed from the previous hand when the flop came 4-8-J. The crowd (and Wilson) erupted again as Brian's set stood up and he took over the chip lead.
The two took a needed break as we moved up to the 6/12K level. The two combatants battled over the next eighteen hands, swapping the chip lead back and forth throughout their battle. On Hand 195, both players pot bet each other preflop until Gale was all in. It was soon to be the end as he grimaced when he turned up his K-J against Wilson's A-Q. When the board fell rags, Brian Wilson, born in Illinois and now living in Fort Myers, FL, became the latest champion at the 2005 World Series!

FINAL STATISTICS

1. Brian Wilson, Fort Myers, FL $370,685
2. John Gale, London, England $204,440
3. Derek LeForte, Maple Ridge $112,330
4. Allen Cunningham, Marino Del Ray, CA $89,865
5. Tony Cousineau, Daytona Beach, FL $67,400
6. Steven "Lucky" Liu, United Kingdom $56,165
7. Cyndy Violette, Atlantic City, NJ $44,930
8. Joe Sebok, San Francisco, CA $33,700
9. Burt Boutin, Las Vegas, NV $22,465
10. Matt Lefkowitz, Carmel Valley, CA $15,725

  door: 2005-06-24 17:51:34

Playing poker for free...and winning

June 23, 2005
Earl Burton
One of the things that the recent success of poker has brought out are the "dotnet" sites that many of the online rooms have started. With the poker rooms not able to advertise their "dotcom" rooms, the minds behind those sites have started a "dotnet" partner to be able to draw players into the world of poker and, thus, advertise themselves. These "dotnet" sisters are a completely free alternative to the "dotcom" world that millions play at every day (for actual money). Of course, the "dotnet" sites are hoping that the players will eventually want to move to the real game at the "dotcom" site.

UltimateBet.net is the first site that is seeing the potential to drum up more visitors and even potentially add on to their main site action with their UltimateBet.net World Poker Challenge. The tournament is a series of six $10,000 tournaments that will start on June 18th, with a final table "winner take all" $200,000 championship set to play on July 23rd. They are the first free site that is offering a major amount of money for their online "dotnet" players in this manner.

UltimateBet.net is offering up 48 chances per week for players to qualify for this championship, with the six winners being flown to Los Angeles to play the weekly tournaments at the Hollywood Park Casino. The six weekly winners will then square off for the big prize come July 23rd.

This isn't a tournament to be taken lightly, either. Each week's battle will be broadcast on Fox Sports Network on Saturday evenings beginning June 18th. It is remarkable that a "free" site can get this airtime, so expect a boatload of UltimateBet.net commercials to be running during the airing of the event!

The free sites are offered as an educational tool for the new players. For someone who doesn't feel comfortable enough with the online game (or potentially isn't comfortable with money transactions online) , it is a way they can get in on the action without a monetary expenditure. These new players can practice their game, risk free, and also learn the game as well.

This also may be the way that online poker rooms circumvent the archaic rules and guidelines of the American government. While their main sites continue to do astronomical business, the "dotnet" sites allow people to play for free (the expenditure for the poker rooms is minimal, at best). If someone sees that they can win big on the "dotnets", they may actually decide to take their shot in the main rooms (the "dotcom"). When you add in the addition of advertising (and we have all seen the increase of "dotnet" advertising on television), it is another way for the poker rooms to increase their bottom lines.

All one has to do is download the UltimateBet.net software onto their computer systems, offer up your personal information (name and address), and start playing the freerolls that the "dotnet" offers for the event. The tournament should offer the chance for someone who plays recreationally to pick up a nice bankroll to make their move into the "real" world of poker!

For more information, go to UltimateBet.net (and make sure it's dotNET!) and learn more!

  door: 2005-06-24 19:23:35

Poker Stars makes a move

June 23, 2005
Michael Friedman
The laws regarding poker and online gambling are murky at best, especially when you try to understand the U.S. policy toward foreign casinos. Lawyers say that federal law prohibits online gambling, but many of the online sites sit outside the U.S. jurisdiction and the laws simply can not be enforced.

U.S. law also prohibits American companies from being involved with online gambling sites. The U.S. government has made several attempts to stop interactive online sites by taking legal actions against several prominent U.S. companies and media outlets, such as Google and Esquire magazine.

The government's attempt to clamp down on online gambling seems to be failing. Americans place more annual online bets than people in any other country in the world. According to a January New York Time's article, some $7.6 billion is lost in wagering over the internet, with U.S. residents accounting for half of that.

In January 2005, a small island located in the Irish Sea made a major decision that has created its share of waves in the world of online gaming. The Isle of Man decided to reverse a four-year-old law prohibiting internet companies on the island from accepting bets from U.S. residents. Now companies can accept bets from the U.S.

From the beginning, the Isle of Man prohibited U.S. online bets, but without U.S. bet, business came to a grinding halt. Before the law passed, major gambling organizations like the MGM Grand were pursuing residency on the island. But because of the country's strict law, which originally was what attracted gambling organizations to the island, most gaming companies quickly left.

Fast-forward to June 2005, when as early as this week, PokerStars will be officially announcing its move to the Isle of Man. Accounting for more than 10 percent of market share in the poker sector, PokerStars will bring millions in revenue with it. The Isle of Man is going to cash in on this agreement through a licensing fee and by collecting tax revenue.

At this point, this is where online gambling law gets tricky. Thanks to the island's change in law, PokerStars believes it has the right to accept US bets. PokerStars is banking on the fact that because the Isle of Man's defense and foreign policy is protected by England, it falls under the authority and laws of the World Trade Organization.

The WTO's response to the US's prohibition against online gambling has not been favorable to the U.S. In a recent ruling resulting from the complaints by another small country called Antigua, the WTO ruled against the U.S., saying that the it was in contravention of trade rules by illegally restricting access to Antiguan egaming sites. One can only believe that with the strength of her Royal Majesty's best lawyers behind it, PokerStars appears to be holding all the cards.

PokerStars move has once-again begun to generated rumors that it might try to pursue a listing on the London Stock Exchange. This move would only further cement PokerStars legitimacy in the international business community and would severely limit the U.S. capability to enforce laws against it or companies it works with.

PokerStars' move from Costa Rica will also help to increase its image throughout Europe, allowing them to target a new audience that will support its core of US users. Pokerstars is hedging its bet on its European success in another way as well. It is the main sponsor for the European Poker Tour and has launched a major advertising campaign in the U.K.

PokerStars and U.S. law will eventually collide unless changes in are made to U.S. law very soon. With its move to the Isle of Man, PokerStars has taken some of the gamble out of online gaming and might possibly have put itself in position to bust the house.

  door: 2005-06-24 19:25:27

Poker on TV: Interview with James Hopkins of the Poker Channel

June 22, 2005
Tony Bromham
Our correspondent recently had the pleasure of visiting the London headquarters of The Poker Channel to talk with James Hopkins, Head of Programming about this exciting TV development for poker enthusiasts.

The Poker Channel was launched in the United Kingdom on 23rd March 2005 and is the world's first TV channel dedicated to poker. The Poker Channel is available to all Sky TV subscribers in the UK, as a free to air channel, and is located under the Entertainment section Channel Number 265.


PN: First of all, James, thank you for taking some time out for this.

JH: That's OK.

PN: Perhaps you can just tell us a very brief bit about your background and how you ended up in your current role at The Poker Channel.

JH: I was formerly with Sky Sports (a News Corporation company) for just under nine years producing Poker and Rugby Union programmes. I first produced poker at the Poker Million in the Isle of Man in 2000. That was certainly the first time that poker had ever been filmed live.

PN: Worldwide?

JH: Absolutely. Not all of the programmes in the subsequent Poker Million The Masters series' were live, certainly the finals were, but the Isle of Man was a particularly challenging Outside Broadcast being that it was the first time we had filmed poker at Sky Sports.

During the last three or four years, poker has taken off. I saw an opportunity within poker and resigned from Sky in December (2004) and, along with Crispin (CEO, Crispin Nieboer), set up The Poker Channel.

Crispin is the founder, the channel is his concept. I said to him - this is what I can bring to the table; programming, production, tournaments - give you a production arm to your channel.

PN: Can you explain a bit now about what you now do particularly with regard to the British Poker Open (BPO) which was The Poker Channel's first major tournament?

JH: I would divide my roles up into (a) tournaments and (b) other programming. The BPO, our flagship tournament, was really our first big production. Initially, we had to get some commissions under our belt to fill the schedule, but, we had to go off with a bang and that meant a big tournament. So we really, from scratch, designed the British Poker Open.

We looked to do poker live and on a regular basis We wanted to try and improve poker coverage and include more statistical data- in the Poker Million, we used to cut under the table and not see all the cards. We thought, well, what no-one's really doing is getting all this information onto the screen and the BPO's objective was to achieve this.. Without ever cutting under the table we see all the players' cards as well as the winning percentages for all hole cards. Specially designed software works these out automatically, taking into account the chances of split pots. Doing this also enables the viewers to see which cards the players choose to fold as well as play. The British Poker Open graphics are very advanced as they need to be for live poker. After all, poker coverage is all about getting information across to the viewer.

One thing these graphics have enabled us to do is to have fewer pauses between hands. With no full frame graphics we don't have to pause the deal between hands. Therefore for each blind level we get many more hands in. This is particularly popular with the players.


The BPO was our first big tournament and attracted some of the biggest names in the game from America and Europe, Howard Lederer, Gus Hansen, Chris "Jesus" Ferguson and the 2004 World Series Champion Greg Raymer. It has been a stunning success.

PN: Did they enjoy it?

JH: Yes, they did and they loved the live aspects. The short-handed six player format is very different to the American tournaments the big players are used to playing, and they loved the challenge. They are keen to come again next year.

We saw every hand these guys played! When you watch the WSOP highlights, or the World Poker Tour, you don't get this. You only see selected highlights. Seeing every hand gives you a much better idea of how the players play, and what their strategies are. That's unique and that was the BPO!

We have just filmed the PokerStars.com World Cup of Poker finals which is an annual heads-up tournament - the four finalists were Austria, Costa Rica, Norway, and Scotland. We did it in the same venue as the BPO, again with fans and team mates watching in the bar on big screens. The atmosphere was great at the event and this comes across well on screen. Our comprehensive statistics are particularly relevant for heads up play.

We are pitching for many new tournaments. Sponsors love the branding, and that we can film for hours and hours due to having a dedicated channel. We are looking at new formats and are looking to have regular tournaments; heads-up, six-table and eight or nine table formats as well

PN: There's a program called "Barny's Home Games" which is an interesting feature where Barny Boatman (a top European Professional) goes to people's homes and joins in their home poker games. Do you want to give me some background about how that came to be?

JH: Well, it is very important to us to address grass roots poker so, although our tournaments might have a lot of statistical information on screen and the coverage is quite sophisticated, we want to make sure we don't alienate newcomers to the game. One of the ideas that we developed with Barny Boatman was to send him to people's houses to play with them in their home games.

PN: Yes, he's the perfect man for that role!

JH: Barny was quite keen to work with us on the series and has plenty of interesting programme ideas. It is a very exciting format. I think it is great that anybody who has a home game can have a poker professional come round and play with them and teach them a few tricks, and Barny is a great face for the show.

PN: Is there a waiting list for that now?

JH: I think there is and (laughs) personally I've been inundated with requests asking if Barny can come and play at their games! It's important for us because it is not just about spending masses of money on buying in big American productions. It's important to us that we have other programming apart from the BPO and other big tournaments. With regard to documentaries and other programming, we want to make sure that we still address "grass roots" poker and teaching people the game.

PN: Does Barny enjoy his role?

JH: Yes, he does. Home games are a big part of what poker is all about. Barny used to play home games with the other Hendon Mob players (fellow UK professionals Ram Vaswani, Joe Beevers and Ross Boatman) and still does. He has said it himself, it is where he came from, and it's great meet people and enjoy the different games they play. He loves it because it's something a bit different from the regular tournament circuit.

PN: Well, James, it's been a pleasure and thank you for your time.

JH: Thank you

Ed Note: The Poker Channel recently aired the Party Poker World Open. Another televised tourney is qualifying on Party Poker now. Join the fun.

  door: 2005-06-24 19:26:52

Beginner’s strategy

Why people start playing poker? Probably the reasons are very different and there is no need or use of enumerating all of them. The fact is that people start playing this game and every day the number of poker players increases. It is very easy to start playing, but to play good and win is rather difficult for a beginner. It is very important to have a strategy or leastwise some bases of it for a newbie. Nowadays, there is much of information about poker strategy, though it is a must to understand what your own strategy will be before playing. In this situation all information about poker strategies will be some kind of a supplementary material for you, but if you take all possible strategies and try to apply them to your game, you will see that first of all you must find out which of them really fits you and overall not all strategies are extremely helpful. Poker strategy is a probable plan of playing. First of all beginners shouldn’t play poker with low cards, as then there is an extremely big possibility to lose. After some time, when you feel that you got enough skills in this game you may try to play with low cards, but when you’re doing your first steps and want to win don’t practise this. Don’t bluff too much when you’re a beginner; in the whole, until you can’t do this good don’t do this at all. Professional players are advanced enough to see bluff, so you won’t achieve anything except betraying your situation. Much better idea is to learn how to control body language. To achieve good results in this isn’t very easy. It may seem so from the first sight, but in practice you will see everything is vice versa. When you see your last dollar on the table and you get garbage, your face will change its colours, you will forget all what was learnt about body language and “poker faced”. To avoid this you must work with yourself for a long time and as a result you may achieve good results in bluffing. Never play for big money or with advanced players if you are a beginner. Playing for big money won’t lead you to good results and can discourage you or conversely may provoke immoderate risk, what can lead to a very unpleasant outcomes. Playing with skilled players your chances to win are very low, it is better to play with average players and to get more practice and only then try you luck with pros. The best thing is to watch how advanced ones play, but not compete with them. In conclusion, having a good strategy you can achieve extremely high results, but everyone should have his own, individual strategy, copying other players strategies is almost useless. Build your own strategy with the help of others.


  door: 2005-06-24 19:29:54

On-line Multi-Table Tournaments – Part 2

In the first article on Multi-Table Tournaments (MTT), I went through the mechanics of the MTT structure and the reasons they are so popular. I also highlighted the possible value that you can find by entering under-subscribed events where a guaranteed prize pool is subsidized by the house. None of that is much use to you, the player, if you cannot make it to the prizes! You have to know how and I will try to draw from my experiences at playing MTT’s. One thing is for certain, the style of player varies enormously between sites. At one, where I have had some success, about half the field of 500 are eliminated before the first hour has expired! There seems to be a kamikaze attitude borne of a perceived need to accumulate chips fast and early. People are all-in from early position with KJ offsuit, 44, A7 - all hands that are likely to be behind if called. It may be desirable to build early chips but not at the expense of a series of coin flips. Why give yourself a 50% chance of elimination with no way back? After all, an early double-up isn’t worth a small blind in the later stages! I play that fast MTT because I know if I keep my head down and only play premium hands in the first hour, I will likely have made it into a competition that includes 250 people instead of 500. Yet the first 50 places still pay - good value indeed! Sure, I might have a lot less in chips than some who have played fast and survived but, to get to the later stages, you have to make your big plays in the middle stages when the blinds and stacks are bigger. Someone who doubled up early will still go out if he or she is the victim of a double up later on when the chip stacks are taller. In contrast, some MTT’s I have played at other sites are incredibly tight and if anyone raises, you can be sure the hand is premium. Much also depends on the structure of the MTT. By this I mean how fast the blinds move up. A fast structured tournament puts the players under pressure to build chip stacks, and this might go some way to explaining the behaviour of the players at the site I talked about. The structure is fast. I suggest you enter some low cost MTT’s at different sites (with different platforms too as some sites share the same platform or “skin” – basically it is the same table with players accessing from different hosts). See how they differ but in all cases play it tight early on like you would a cash game where you would hate to lose the money you have brought to the table. In the next article, I’ll talk some more about middle stage play in an MTT.

 

  door: 2005-06-24 19:30:22

On-line Multi-Table Tournaments – Part 1

At most on-line poker sites, you can enter a host of Multi-Table Tournaments or MTT’s as they are often known. As the name suggests, these are tournaments that are not restricted to a single table; often they are unrestricted or limited only by a pre-determined maximum number of players. The underlying attraction of this format which the online sites like to promote is the potential for a large reward from a small outlay. The downside of that is the large number of entries that such a prize pool implies. A typical “normal” MTT might look like this: Fee: $20 + $2 Maximum number of players: 500 The prize pool will comprise the sum total of the $20 fees each player has paid. It will not include the $2 rake. If the maximum of 500 players enter, the prize pool is $10,000 and the house makes $1,000. Very nice work if you can get it! The prize structure might then be: 1st place 30% 2nd 20% 3rd 15%............ …………and so on down to 40th or 50th. 1st place wins 30% x $10,000 = $3,000, a 136-fold profit on the $22 outlay; hence the attraction. The remaining 450 players below 50th receive nothing, including the unfortunate “bubble”, the person in 51st or whichever place happens be one below the last paying position. Above that, the next 20 or 30 places receive little more than a fee refund with a bit on top. That is not the end of it though. The standard MTT merely distributes the money around between players, whilst the house takes a small percentage for putting on the show. This is akin to the roulette table where the “0” represents the $2 fee in this case. The MTT player has to have a good expectation that they can beat the average or they will be wasting their money. But, before considering the best approach to tackling an MTT, there is something else available if you look in the right places that will help provide some value. That is when a poker room offers an MTT with a Guaranteed Prize Pool! When you see one of these MTT’s, they are advertised by the minimum size of the prize pool. You should then look at the entry fee excluding the house rake and divide the guaranteed pool by the entry fee. This gives you the number of players that the house needs in the tournament in order to cover the guarantee out of players’ entry fees. If the number of players that register by the scheduled start time is less the number you have calculated, the house has to contribute to the pool to cover the guarantee, at their own cost, effectively from the rakes paid by the players. That provides you and the other players with a monetary edge. The house is subsidising your entry fee, and you should take them up on the offer. But, you need to go where the value is and that is not usually the big headline sites. The large poker rooms put plenty of advertising muscle behind their guaranteed MTT’s and this enables them to attract sufficient numbers to cover themselves. Yet, because their headline guarantee is large and the winner’s purse also of broadcasting proportions, they can keep the big fees rolling in. But, the value has gone for you, the player. There are more and more sites offering attractive games and you should be able to find them here at Pokerworks.com. For example, I use a busy platform that offers two guaranteed MTT’s every day. They rarely fill up to the minimum needed for the house to cover itself. There is good value here if you know how to approach the playing side. Never turn down the chance of free value while it lasts! In my next article on MTT’s, I will look at the playing side more closely to see what is needed to make the final table in an MTT.


  door: 2005-06-24 19:30:58

Omaha Hold'em and Texas Hold'em for poker rookies

New players often makes a muddle of Omaha Hold'em and Texas Hold'em games. It causes a misreading of hands and unwanted stress. They look almost the same at a first glance, but if we see into their rules and methods of playing, we could notice some main differences: Pocket cards. The dealer gives two pocket cards in Texas Hold'em and four pocket cards are being dealt by a dealer to players in Omaha Hold'em. Two plus three and any five cards. The aim of poker games is to collect the best hand. Everything is very simple in Texas Hold'em. Player uses any five cards from the board and his pocket cards. For example, player was dealt with A-5 and the board came A-10-K-7-Q. The best hand for the player would be A-A-K-Q-10. As you noticed, one card has been used from the pocket cards and four cards has been used from the board. In Omaha Hold'em only two cards of four and three cards of five consists the hand. It is the most forgettable rule for newbies. For a complete clearness, i...


  door: 2005-06-24 19:31:47

Basic poker rules

You are one of the most that want to play poker but you are not sure about the understanding poker rules very well? There are about 15 poker games and every game has it's own rules, but it is possible to make an abstract model of specific features of a game. So, when you decide to play poker, first you should know some basic rules and definitions. There are few sorts of poker. Omaha, Stud and Hold'em are main poker games, which are being held in casinos. They are played by 2-10 players with a deck of 52 cards usually. The aim of poker is to collect the best hand from the pocket cards and the board cards. Let's remember the rating of the hands from highest to lowest: Royal flush – A-K-Q-J-10 all suited. For example, all hearts. Straight Flush – Five cards of the same suit in sequence. For example, 6-7-8-9-10 of diamonds. Four of kind – For cards from five of the same rank. For example, K-K-K-K-10. Full house – Three cards of one rank and two cards of another...


  door: 2005-06-24 19:32:18

Legends of Poker - Doyle Brunson

June 07, 2005
Al Moe
Seven of the first eight World Series of Poker Champions hailed from the state of Texas. What could account for that? Was it something in the water? Were those players really that good? Or was it simply that they were playing the toughest, most exciting poker game ever invented: Texas Hold'em?

Nobody knows for sure why, but the fellows from Texas just dominated the competition when it came to big money, high pressure Texas Hold'em, and Doyle "Texas Dolly" Brunson was arguably the finest player by the end of the 1970's.

Born in Longworth, Texas in 1933, Doyle grew up with his brother and sister in a small home his father was able to provide them by working at the Planters Gin Co. He recalled his father as "The calmest, most even-tempered individual I've ever been exposed to," and from Doyle's later accomplishments in poker, he must have inherited his calm demeanor from his father.

Summers were filled with play; lots of running and swimming, and Doyle's athleticism carried on at Sweetwater High School. As a seventeen-year old senior he was the best high school one-mile runner in the state, and later at Hardin-Simmons College he was chosen as one of the top ten college basketball players in the country by Dell's Basketball Magazine. Everything seemed to be going according to plan.

A summer job at the U. S. Gypsum plant changed all that, as Doyle was injured while on the job. His severely-damaged right leg needed to be immobilized for almost two years, and by the time the cast came off, his basketball days were over. The injury has hampered Doyle throughout his life, but it just made him more determined to succeed in other areas.

The athletic drive and competitiveness he learned in high school and college have served him well in the world of high-stakes poker. Of course, it wasn't always that way. Although his poker winnings paid for his college expenses after his injury, he had intended to be a superintendent of schools when he graduated. However, since no such offer was forthcoming, Doyle took a job selling business equipment. By the end of his first day he was in a poker game, and thinking that the game was a lot more fun (and lucrative), than selling business machines.

Doyle spent several years playing poker in the tough north side of Fort Worth, Texas, hard on the Mexican border. With his friend, Dwayne Hamilton, he learned all forms of poker, and began to excel at any form of no-limit, whether it was hold'em or Kansas City lowball. After moving downtown, to a slightly calmer, higher-limit game, Doyle and Brian "Sailor" Roberts, became friends. Soon, the two were traveling to towns all over Texas looking for good games. Sailor said Doyle was "The most competitive sonofabitch I'd ever met, and that's saying something when you consider the players I've been up against."

As their poker ability improved, so did the size of the games. By the time the two friends ran into Thomas "Amarillo Slim" Preston, they were used to $1000 pots being won. They were not used to losing, however, and after missing the game in Amarillo, Texas, Slim invited them to his home. He promptly busted both of them in heads-up matches, then loaned them a couple thousand dollars to get down the road to the next game.

Sailor and Doyle spend their nights playing poker, and their days discussing strategy. They shared their bankroll, and a month later they agreed to go partners with Slim. Soon the three friends were playing poker all over the southern circuit, looking for games in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. They also setup bookmaking in Fort Worth and Midland, because there was plenty of oil and cattle money in Texas at the time.

Slim liked the arrangement, since he considered Doyle and Sailor to be two of the most honest people he had ever met. He also thought the two were a good match, since Sailor cursed like a blue-streak, and called Doyle "One of the most polite people he had ever met." Later, Slim would say, "Doyle is as tricky as a rattlesnake without a rattle, so you have to give him some room, and when you do, he steals another pot from you."

When the US Government made it illegal to transmit sporting information across state lines in 1961, Doyle and Slim decided it was time to get out of the bookmaking. "Sailor" stayed with it, and later paid the price with a one-year jail sentence. There were plenty of poker games to get to, and the three partners even bet among themselves when games weren't available.

Slim remembers walking into one of their hotel rooms in Mexico during a vacation and seeing Doyle and Sailor pitching pesos into a hunting cap, and at that point Doyle was stuck eight-thousand dollars. "Oh, boy, they liked to gamble."

The following year, Doyle met his future wife, Louise, in Sailor's hometown of San Angelo, Texas. They were married in 1962, and just a few months later Doyle woke up with a sore throat. Before he new it, the sore throat and pea-size lump on his neck has swelled to the size of a hen's egg.

After two surgeries, Doyle managed to pull-through, even though he was not expected to live. Since money was tight, Louise and Sailor nursed him 24 hours a day for two weeks. Eventually he was strong enough to recuperate at his sister's home, and soon enough he was back playing poker.

The crushing medical bills were heavy on Doyle's mind, but he had a new appreciation for life, and a keener sense of everything around him, including his poker opponents. In fact, Doyle played the best poker he ever remembers, winning 54 straight times in a row. By the time he had a loss, the medical bills were more than paid off.

Doyle spent the next ten years playing mostly in Fort Worth, and also Las Vegas. In 1973 he packed the family up and moved permanently to Las Vegas, and amazingly, his best poker days were ahead of him. His best golf may not have been, as Doyle has admitted to playing some very high stakes golf, and "Sometimes, the other guy played just a little better than me."

Although the World Series of Poker was in its seventh year before Doyle won the Hold'em Championship, he had won the deuce to seven lowball tournament. Not satisfied with winning just the 1976 WSOP Championship, Doyle repeated the feat in 1977. In 1978, Doyle's book, Super System, was published.

Doyle spent an enormous amount of money getting what has been described as the "poker bible" published. He drew from his own experiences, and produced the finest poker book ever published at the time. Not only did he include his own "style" and ideas, but his got the best players of the day to include their own views on poker. That list of the best players and foremost authorities on poker included Mike Caro, Chip Reese, Joey Hawthorne, David Sklansky, and Bobby Baldwin.

Over the next twenty years, Doyle continued to play high-stakes poker with the best players in the world. He stopped playing in most tournaments, but could often be seen in the side-games of major tournaments. He invested his money in some business ventures, like his golf business in Florida with Dewey Tompko and Jack Binion, and thought about writing a second Super System.

In 1998, Doyle entered several of the tournaments at the World Series of Poker, and although he was supposed to be "over the hill", he won the Razz Championship, took second in pot-limit Omaha, and third in deuce to seven lowball. Could this be some strange fluke for a 65-year old player? Not hardly.

Doyle has continued to play in high-limit games since that wonderful return to tournaments in 1998. He plays regularly in the highest games at the Bellagio Casino in Las Vegas, and won his 9th World Championship bracelet in 2003, taking the H.O.R.S.E. title, proving again that a player should be good at all forms of poker.

Doyle's son, Todd, has followed in his father's footsteps, making a name for himself in the high-limit games, and winning a purported $20 million dollars this past year from the likes of Andy Beal, while playing a $100,000 - $200,000 limit hold'em game. It appears Todd has received both good instruction, from his father, and also the innate feel for poker that only Doyle could pass on.

There is no doubt that Doyle Brunson has proven himself to be the best, all-around poker player of the past fifty years, and it's hard to think of more fitting proof of a true champion, than to have their child exhibit some of the same ability. For those of you who are enjoying the sight of Doyle Brunson playing in tournaments like the World Poker Tour on television, remember, this great player won his first World Championship almost thirty years ago. What more can be said?

  door: 2005-06-26 19:08:13

Hellmuth Early World Series of Poker Favorite

June 07, 2005
Earl Burton
Favorite?
While the cards are flying in Las Vegas, bookmakers are offering up their best ideas as to who will win the Big One in the World Series of Poker.

Sportsbook.com, a London, England based bookmaking operation, is laying odds on who is going to take the coveted World Championship. Alex Czajkowski, the Marketing Director for Sportsbook.com, said, "There will be a huge audience for this event. We want to offer people the chance to get involved with the action from Las Vegas, even if they can't get a seat at a World Series of Poker table."

It is very interesting to see the names that currently make up their list. The favorite at this time is 1989 World Champion Phil Hellmuth, who can be bet on at 40-1 odds to take the championship. Many players are listed as 50-1 shots to take the title, including past World Champions Scotty Nguyen and Chris "Jesus" Ferguson. WPT Champion Tuan Le, 2004 World Series Player of the Year Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey, and European players Gus Hansen and Ram Vaswani are also locked into that 50-1 shot. Even Hollywood has been able to get some odds, with Ben Affleck being posted as a 150-1 shot and "Rounders" stars Matt Damon and Edward Norton drawing 250-1 odds. Leading the ladies are Jennifer Harman and Annie Duke, who are 60-1 shots, according to the line.

With the Main Event field expected to be over 6,000 players strong, how you can lay out odds for something like this stretches the mind! It does show, though, that you can pretty much lay down a buck on any sporting event, even something as large as the World Series of Poker! You can view the entire list of players at Sportsbook.com, if you are interested in getting the latest line on who will win the biggest poker tournament ever

  door: 2005-06-26 19:09:16

Youngest WSOP bracelet winner ever crowned in $1500 Limit Hold'em event

June 07, 2005
Oliver Tse
Eric Froehlich
College dropout Eric Froehlich of Los Angeles became the youngest bracelet winner ever at the World Series of Poker (WSOP) when he outlasted a field of 1049 players the $1500 buy-in Limit Hold'em event at the Rio Pavilion Convention Center.

At the age of 21 years, 3 months, and 29 days, Froehlich is over a year younger than Gavin Griffin, who won a WSOP bracelet in 2004 as a 22-year-old.

Despite being just one credit shy of graduating from college, Froehlich told ESPN poker commentator Norman Chad, "I have no plans to go back to college any time soon...I consider poker to be a better opportunity."

Besides winning the coveted gold bracelet, Froehlich collected the first place prize of $361,910.

In a marathon heads-up battle that lasted over 120 hands, Froehlich ended the tournament at approximately 4am by eliminating Silicon Valley engineering manager Jason Steinhorn, who earned $182,040 for his 2nd place finish.

On Hand 259 with limits at 25000-50000, Steinhorn raised from the button and Froehlich called. On a flop of 9s 2s 2d, Froehlich bet and Steinhorn called. Froehlich bet and Steinhorn called when the Th came on the turn. Froehlich bet and Steinhorn called his remaining chips all-in on the river when the Ts hit the board. Froehlich turned over Ks 4s for a flush and Steinhorn mucked his hand and tap the table to concede defeat.

Froehlich had a chance to win the tournament 2 hands earlier on Hand 257 but was outdrawn on the river, when his pocket Fours were counterfeited on the river against Steinhorn's Ace-Ten on a board of 8d 8c 2d 5c 5s.

Froehlich, who started heads-up play with a 2-to-1 chip advantage, fell behind Steinhorn by a 4-to-1 deficit at one point before coming back to retake the chip lead by winning a big pot on Hand 244. Froehlich raised from the button and Steinhorn called. On a flop of Ks 3h Qh, Steinhorn checked, Froehlich bet, Steinhorn raised, Froehlich re-raised, and Steinhorn called. Steinhorn checked the Kd on the turn and called Froehlich's bet. When the Ad fell on the river, Steinhorn bet and Froehlich called. Steinhorn mucked the hand without showing.

Poker professional Todd Witteles of Las Vegas was eliminated in 3rd place by Froehlich on Hand 131. With limits at 15000-30000, Froehlich raised from the button and Witteles called from the big blind. On the flop of Qc Kh 9d, Witteles checked, Froehlich bet, Witteles raised his remaining chips all-in, and Froehlich called, turning over As Ks for top pair top kicker. Witteles could only present Ac 9h for bottom pair. The Qh on the turn and the 2h on the river brought no help from Witteles, who exited with a prize of $115,810.

Southern California-based college student Adam Hersh finished 4th with a prize of $101,335 when he was eliminated by Froehlich on Hand 87. Froehlich raised to open and Hersh called from the big blind. On a flop of 9h 4h 4d, Hersh checked, Froehlich bet, Hersh raised, and Froehlich re-raised. When the Qs came on the turn, Hersh checked, Froehlich bet, and Hersh re-raised his remaining 15000 chips all-in. Froehlish made a pair of nines with Js 9s whle Hersh could only produce pocket Fives.

Seattle-based poker pro Christian Van Hees, who won the $1500 limit hold'em event at the WSOP over 10 years ago, could only finish in 5th place for his first WSOP money finish in 10 years when he was eliminated by in 5th place by Witteles. On Hand 77, Van Hees bet his remaining 25000 chips before the flop while holding Jc 9d and he was called by Witteles who was holding Ad 6h. Witteles made 2-pair on a board of 7s Kh Ac 6d 8h to send Van Hees home with a prize of $86,855

Canadian television camera operator Devin Armstrong overplayed pocket deuces on Hand 46 to finish 6th. With the limits at 20000-40000, Froehlich bet, Armstong raised, Froehlich re-raised, Armstrong 4-bet, and Froehlist 5-bet. On the flop of Jh 9d 5d, Armstong bet, Frochlich raised, Armstrong re-raied all-in for 28000, and Froehlich called instantly, turning over pocket Aces. The Td on the turn and the 3s on the river sent Armstrong to the rail with a prize of 72,380.

Peter "The Poet" Costa of England and Wing Wong of Southern California were eliminated on back-to-back hands to finish in 7th and 8th respecively. On hand 33 with limits at 20000-40000, Witteles opened the betting, Wong raised all-in for 18000 more and Hersh called. Holdig Tc 3c, Hersh outdrew Wong holding Jack-nine when a the flop of 3d Ts 4d hit the board. Costa exited one hand later when his pocket eights were outdrawn by Witteles' Kd Jd when a King flopped. Costa earned $57,905 for finishing 7th and Wong earned $43,430 for finishing 8th.

Brian Mogelefsky of Huntington, New York was eliminated in 9th place on Hand 29 in a 4-way pot. With limits at 10000-20000, Mogelefsky raised under-the-guy, Witteles re-raised, Steinhorn called from the small blind, Van Hees called from the big blind, and Mogelefsky called all-in. Steinhorn bet the flop of 5h 2d 8h and both Witteles and Van Hees called. When the Td came off on the turn, Steinhorn bet and both Witteles and Van Hees dcalled. Steinhorn bet again on the river when the 7h hit the board and both Witteles and Van Hees folded. Steinhorn turned over pocket Tens for a set while Mogelefsky turned over pocket Kings for one pair. Mogelesfky took home $28,950.


Actuary Zelong "Freeman" Dong of Birmingham, Alabama was down to just 6000 chips after losing Hand 4 to Witteles. With limits at 8000-16000, Dong Raised and Witteles called from the big blind. On a flop of Qh 6d Jd, Witteles bet and Dong called. When the 8d hitting the board on the turn, Witteles bet, Dong raised, Witteles re-raised, and Dong called. Witteles bet and Dong called on the river after the 2s came off. Wittles turned over Ad 5d for the nut flush and Dong mucked.

Dong was eliminated on the next hand when he raised all-in for 6000 under the gun. Witteles raised to 16000 from the small blind and Costa called from the big blind. Witteles bet and Costa called on the flop of Jc Kc 4d. After the 6h came off on the turn, Witteles checked, Costa bet 16000, and Witteles called. Both Witteles and Costa checked the river card of Qd. Witteles turned over QJ for two-pair, Costa turned over AJ for one pair, and Dong mucked. Dong received $15,925 for his 10th place finish.

(Note: The $1500 limit hold'em event was added to the list of ESPN-televised events to replace the $1500 pot limit hold'em event, which could not be videotaped due to a schedule conflict with the final table of $1500 no limit hold'em event. To avoid any more changes in the list of televised events, ESPN and Harrah's entertainment have decided to stretch each of the remaining 12 ESPN-televised WSOP preliminary bracelet events to 3 days so that the final table TV taping can start at 2pm.)

WSOP Event 4 $1500 Buy-in Limit Hold'em Final Table Results

Place Player Hometown Prize
1 Eric Froehlich Los Angeles, California $361,910
2 Jason Steinhorn Cupertino, California $182,040
3 Todd Witteles Las Vegas, Nevada $115,810
4 Adam Hersh Aguora Hills, California $101,335
5 Christian Van Hees Seattle, Washington $86,855
6 Devin Armstrong Toronto, Ontario $72,380
7 Peter Costa Leicester, England $57,905
8 Wing Wong Rowland Heights, California $43,430
9 Brian Mogelefsky Huntington, New York $28,950
10 Zelong "Freeman" Dong Birmingham, Alabama $15,925

  door: 2005-06-26 19:10:52

Poker champ, Chris Moneymaker, tours BR
Chris Moneymaker’s road to winning the 2003 World Series of Poker Tour began with a $40 online tournament and brought him all the way to the final table where he won $2.5 million. And yes, Moneymaker is his real name. He showed his driver’s license in the middle of Click’s to prove it. Chris recently toured Baton Rouge for Canadian Club and he offered to sit down with me for an interview.

BF: Chris, what brings you to Baton Rouge?

CM: I’m down here doing a Canadian Club promotional tour. It’s called, “The Smooth Road to Vegas.” We go across the country and in your market you get to play poker tournaments at bars and win a chance to come to Vegas and play against me for 2.5 million dollars. You can also go to ccsmooth.com and register on the sweepstakes there to win a chance to come to Vegas. We’re going to take one winner from the sweepstakes to come out and play against me in Vegas for 2.5 million dollars. On ccsmooth.com you can see the schedule we have for upcoming cities.

BF: What’s the most annoying thing someone can do, in your mind, at an internet poker table and a real poker table?

CM: On the Internet, if you basically just take too long. It’s a fast game. You’re there to play pretty fast. Someone that plays like eight games at a time can really slow down the action. You get that a lot. You see people playing seven or eight tables at a time. You know. You’re waiting forever for them to get back. Other than that, there’s really not that much frustrating stuff people can do. With the chat you can block out everything else. That’s what’s great about the Internet you don’t have to put up with some of the stuff face to face. So, it’s really nice in that respect. At a real poker table, poker players tend to stink sometimes, because they play such long hours—and don’t take a shower. Some people come in and they’re loud and obnoxious, and that can be annoying too. A lot of that is to get into your head, so that’s understandable. But, you know, handle it with class if you can.

BF: Since you’ve been on the road touring, what’s the funniest thing you’ve had happen?

CM: Good Lord… The funniest autograph I’ve given was when a guy came up to me for an autograph for his daughter. And I asked what his daughter’s name was and he paused a second to think about it and said, “Bob.” It was for him. He was just too embarrassed to ask.

BF: Have you ever watched Rounder since winning the 2003 WSOP tournament? And if so, how is it different for you to watch now?

CM: It’s definitely changed for me. I’ve watched that movie probably fifty times before the World Series. And I haven’t watched it once since I’ve won. Because, I know it by heart, so there’s no point in watching it. The only time I did watch it afterwards was when I did the special commentary with Helmuth, Chan, and Ferguson. That’s the only time I watched it after I won. That was an experience, sitting there with those guys and talking about it and experiencing it with them.

BF: Do you ever watch yourself play on ESPN? And if so, what’s it like seeing other people play against you and the hands they have when they play against you?

CM: I don’t really watch it for one reason. What you see on TV are isolated hands and you don’t see what goes into the plays that make up those hands. You don’t see how a player is manipulating the table before a hand. And that’s a big part of poker. Who’s the table captain? Who’s manipulating the table? Who’s playing what hands before what you see on TV. What you see on TV are the climatic hands. While they’re good, you miss out on the big picture. It’s great TV, but you miss out on what poker is really all about.

BF: What’s the best advice you can give someone who may be thinking about playing Internet poker for the first time?

CM: Start as small as you can. That’s the great thing about Internet poker. You can start at one cent, two cent. Don’t play over your head. To play poker the correct way you have to have a sufficient bankroll. Make sure you start small. Don’t move up levels until you are confident you can beat the level you are at and then just move up gradually. It will come quickly. You’ll move up levels faster than you realize, but just take your time in doing it. If you step up too fast, you’ll just end up going bankrupt. It happened to me many times over. You just got to be really careful when you step, because once you step up in levels, things just get more and more difficult. The higher the competition you play the tougher it’s going to get. So, start small.

BF: So, what’s next for you, Chris?

CM: Well, I’ve got two companies started, Moneymaker Gaming, which we’re doing high-end poker chips with Playboy and Nascar, and Johnny Chan and I are launching poker schools across the country. I’m really focused on getting that up and running. I plan on doing Canadian Club, those two other things, and spending as much time with my family as I can. I don’t know what the future holds in the next couple of years. I’ll probably play poker quite a while. Eventually, my wife and I want to own a bar together and that’s probably what we’ll end up doing in Nashville somewhere.

  door: 2005-07-02 20:04:24

New state law in effect Friday bans organized poker tournaments
CEDAR FALLS --- Throughout the Cedar Valley, organizations are preparing for the change in state law Friday which will outlaw poker tournaments by hosting final games.

At the Cedar Falls AMVETS, organizers are mourning the loss of a 2-month-old Texas Hold'em tournament that was wildly successful in attracting business on slow Wednesday nights.

"We had big plans for this thing," said Rene Johns, bar manager of AMVETS Post 49.

The game at the AMVETS hall cost players $20 to join, with all the money paid out to the winners. Money raised from the extra business was earmarked for the Veterans Blind Golf Tournament in Iowa City.

Steve Hunemuller, president of the group's board of trustees, said the games brought 30 to 40 new members or renewal memberships. The tournaments attracted around 20 people each week, increasing liquor sales on those nights by 50 percent to 60 percent, Johns said.

The change in the law is actually more of a clarification, state officials say. It does away with a loophole that allowed poker tournaments. The old law, which officials said was too vague, allowed for tournaments, and did not specifically forbid poker tournaments. The new law clarifies that poker cannot be considered a "bona fide" activity.

Now, the issue seems ironclad.

"We've had people check into it," Johns said. "But pretty much everyone says we have to shut it down."

The new law may also effect the group's other tournaments, such as bowling, golf and a "pepper" game held every Thursday night. Johns said the organization will check into the legality of each event before continuing.

"We will not do anything to risk our liquor license," she said.

At Mr. G's, a bar in Cedar Falls, the poker games were popular, attracting between 30 and 40 players each week. Wanda Andree, a bartender, said the attraction increased liquor and food sales.

"We're a neighborhood bar," she said. "This brings in the neighborhood."

Owners of the bar intend to adapt the tournament to fit the new rules by separating the tables and lowering the stakes dramatically. The last regular tournament was played Monday.

At the Sports Page in Waterloo, a popular Monday tournament had what could be its last game Monday. General manager Daniel Wells said he'll keep fighting to host the tournaments.

"I will be lobbying with the Legislature myself," Wells said. "I know a few (legislators), who are neighbors. I will just continue to talk to them until I'm hoarse."

Wells, who started the game as a way to promote business, said it wasn't fair for the state to shut down the tournaments. He said there was more risk in other poker-based businesses than in Texas Hold'em game at the Sports Page.

"We're talking about $20," he said. "Nobody's losing their mortgage, nobody's wiping out their life savings, and we're not taking people's ability to buy rent or food. However, the Legislature has determined that we can have that little lotto machine in the corner where people can lose a hundred dollars. If you can lose there, why can't you lose here and have more fun?"

Earlier this month, the local Shriner's organization hosted its first and last tournament, a fresh way to raise money for Shriner hospitals.

State Sen. Bill Dotzler, D-Waterloo, said he was largely opposed to the law because it will hurt fund-raising by nonprofit organizations and rob businesses of revenue.

His mother, Jeanie, owns the Embassy Lounge in Waterloo, and allows regulars to play poker in the establishment. The bar, Dotzler said, holds a "social gaming" license that allows it to permit, but not organize, games among people with pre-existing social relationships.

Dotzler said he voted for the bill due to a miscommunication, but wanted it held back to add amendments to loosen restrictions on social gambling, where players win or lose less than $50 in a 24-hour period, and restore privileges to nonprofit organizations.

The bill, Dotzler said, was spurred by a rash of for-profit games where organizers were making large amounts of money.

His attempts to file an amendment, he said, were blocked by anti-gambling senators. He plans to renew his effort.

Officials at the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals, which regulates gambling, say poker tournaments have always been illegal in Iowa, but differences in interpretation of Iowa law among county officials allowed some to continue.

Some tournament holders have drawn connections between the rise of casino development in Iowa and the new laws, and suggest casino lobbyists were behind the legislation. The lobbyist declaration sheet for the bill listed a number of gambling agencies as interested parties in the bill's progression, but listed themselves as "undecided."

  door: 2005-07-02 20:05:05

Players Network to Broadcast Live From the 'WSOP(R) LIFESTYLE SHOW'
LAS VEGAS, July 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Players Network (OTC Bulletin Board: PNTV - News) announced today that it will produce and air live programming from the site of the WORLD SERIES OF POKER® at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas. The programming from "THE WORLD SERIES OF POKER® LIFESTYLE SHOW" will begin Wednesday, July 6th, and will be carried on Player's Network's new broadband site, (www.playersnetwork.com), marking a three-week acceleration of the planned launch of the broadband site.

The Show will be held concurrent with the start of the $10,000 buy-in main event. The four-day Show will be held in the Rio Hotel Convention Center, that has a theater-quality stage and room for hundreds of customized poker lifestyle convention booths. Poker players, as well as thousands of spectators, will have free access to the Show for poker education, entertainment and involvement with a community of their peers. The company will air 6 hours a day of live programming for 4 days.

Players Network will produce and deliver programming at the "THE WORLD SERIES OF POKER® LIFESTYLE SHOW" as an interactive entertainment and educational experience for those attending the Show as well as on its broadband network and on Video On Demand. There will be scheduled talk shows, seminars, tournaments and other unique and entertaining poker lifestyle programs taking place on the main stage. There will also be "poker reality segments" being filmed throughout the entire venue featuring colorful characters and poker lifestyle suppliers.

Players Network's Founder & President, Mark Bradley and the company's President of Programming, Michael Berk will serve as Executive Producers of the shows. "Our programs will showcase the excitement and passion of the events, the inside stories of the poker players and a behind-the-scenes, never-before-available look at the tournament," said Berk.

Details of the specific programming and the broadcast's marketing relationships will be announced early next week.

About Players Network:

Players Network is the leading gaming industry media company that produces gaming-centric entertainment, information and instruction programming and distributes that programming via hotel casino private networks, home video and DVD distribution and beginning July 6th, on its Broadband Network, (www.playersnetwork.com). The company has a strong 10-year history of providing consumers with gaming content and businesses with strategic partner services in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and the greater US gaming community.

About the World Series of Poker:

The World Series of Poker is the richest sporting event on the planet. This year, the 36th annual event is expected to set participation and prize money records in its first year at The Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino. Thousands of poker enthusiasts from around the globe have begun descending on Las Vegas to compete for some $75 million in total prize money. The largest and most prestigious event of its kind, the World Series of Poker is expected to generate more than 15,000 player registrations by the time its main event begins July 7th.

More information about the 36th annual World Series of Poker is available at www.worldseriesofpoker.com.

  door: 2005-07-02 20:06:27

Wireless Slots Can Be Played Poolside In Vegas
Las Vegas — No more need to fret about all that wasted time waiting in line for the buffet at your favorite casino. Or those tedious talks in a convention room just a few yards from the casino floor. Help is on the way to make it possible to gamble any time — in fact, all the time.

Gov. Kenny G. Guinn signed a law last month authorizing gamblers in Nevada to play slot machines, video poker, blackjack and other games on hand-held wireless devices from public spaces in casinos. The spaces include restaurants, bars, convention rooms, even swimming pools. Hotel rooms, however, are off-limits, to make sure that minors do not get their hands on the new devices, which resemble personal digital assistants or tablet personal computers, depending on where they are being used.

Out by the pool of the Paris Las Vegas hotel and casino, close to the bottom of a 50-story replica of the Eiffel Tower, the idea had instant appeal. L. Dave Ross, a middle-aged tourist from Tampa, Fla., said: “I have no moral objection to the device. Sure, I'd use it out here by the pool. Why not?”

After all, Ross said, “What do you come to Vegas for, except to gamble?”

The devices — which officials say are not likely to be in use in casinos until early next year — represent an important development in the rapidly growing world of gambling, said William Bible, the president of the Nevada Resort Association, which represents the major casino companies.

Traditionally, most casino operators regarded any technology that would allow people to gamble outside their “bricks-and-mortars casinos as a real threat,” Bible said. “They worried that it would cannibalize their business.”

But now, with the spreading popularity of Internet gambling, Bible said, “some companies see the new technology as a real opportunity for expansion.”

At the least, it allows the casinos to get a foothold into the realm of virtual gambling.

Internet gambling is illegal in the United States, under a 1961 anti-racketeering law. But casino companies in Britain, the Caribbean and Gibraltar have gotten around the law by setting up their Web servers and credit card operations offshore so that federal and state prosecutors cannot seize their assets and act to stop them. Prosecutors have also been reluctant to bring charges against individuals using their home computers to place wagers through the Internet.

In 2001, the Nevada Legislature authorized the State Gaming Commission to examine whether casinos here could enter the Internet gambling business. After a year's study, Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa concluded that without a clear new federal policy it would be legally dangerous for Nevada casinos to venture into online gambling.

But the just-approved hand-held devices will be legal because they will not be linked to the Web, Bible said.

The devices were developed by Cantor Fitzgerald LP, the New York-based financial services company, for its bond trading operations and adapted for a bookmaking company it operates in the United Kingdom.

In 2003, Cantor's company in London introduced the first hand-held device that allows for wireless gambling in casinos in Britain, said Joe Asher, the managing director of Cantor G&W (Nevada) LP, a Nevada affiliate of Cantor Fitzgerald. “Since we spent a tremendous amount of money developing the technology, we were looking for other new applications, and so we approached Nevada.”

Asher said the idea had inherent appeal to the big casinos here.

“Think about a swimming pool,” he said, juggling several ringing cell phones. “Casinos spend a lot of money to build them, but when guests are there, swimming, the casino isn't making any money.

“So if the people can play a hand of poker, or play the slots, while they are at the pool, that is money for the casinos,” Asher said.

“The idea is to turn down time into revenue-generating time,” he said.

For competitive reasons, Asher declined to say which casino companies were in line to use the new mobile devices.

He also declined to anticipate how much additional revenue the devices would generate for the casinos. The casinos would rent the devices to customers, who would open accounts to use them.

Asher is quick to dismiss critics who worry that the devices, by allowing for virtually continuous gambling, will create more gambling addicts. “People have already made the decision to come to the casino,” he said, “so if they wanted to, they could just stay in the casino and play all night anyway.”

Dennis Nylander, the chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, said that time would be needed to draw up regulations to put the new law in place and to test the devices to ensure that they cannot be used in hotel rooms.

The current worldwide market for gambling on mobile devices is still relatively modest, about $2 billion, according to a recent report by Juniper Research, a research and consulting firm based in the United Kingdom. But it is expected to explode in the next few years, rising to $19 billion by 2009, and possibly much higher if the United States loosens its restrictions on Internet gambling, the report estimated.

This potential makes the new hand-held devices too tempting for Las Vegas to pass up, said William N. Thompson, a professor of public administration at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

“We've been very two-faced about Internet gambling,” he said. “On the one hand, we want gambling only in our casinos to protect our interests. But we don't want to have the train leave the station without us on board, so the hand-held devices may be a first step into the whole business of Internet gambling.”

  door: 2005-07-03 11:52:12

World Series of Poker not just man¡¯s game
LAS VEGAS - No woman has won the prestigious no-limit Texas Hold ¡¯em main event at the World Series of Poker. In fact, in the tournament¡¯s 35-year history, only one woman has made it to the final table.

But this year, several women have established themselves as top contenders ready to conquer the world of green felt and show this no longer is just a man¡¯s game.

¡°I think that this is the first year that it is actually possible,¡± said Shirley Rosario, who runs the poker-babes.com Web site. ¡°If a woman wins this year, they¡¯ll finally have to stand up and recognize that we can compete with them on their level.¡±
Story continues below ¡ý advertisement

Topping the list is Jennifer Harman of Las Vegas, one of the most feared players at any high-stakes table. She finished second in a World Series of Poker circuit championship event this year.

She is among the women who should be taken seriously when the cards are shuffled at the World Series of Poker¡¯s most well-known event beginning July 7 at the Rio hotel-casino. An estimated 6,600 players will compete for about $62 million, with a first prize that could reach an eye-popping $10 million.

¡°She definitely has a shot,¡± said Daniel Negreanu, perhaps the world¡¯s best poker player. ¡°She¡¯s been tearing it up. Jennifer is already among the greatest players in the world ¡ª men or women. She¡¯s a killer. She¡¯s a pit bull in a Chihuahua¡¯s body.¡±

Joining Harman is Annie Duke, who beat out her older brother and eight other poker legends last year to win $2 million at the World Series of Poker¡¯s Tournament of Champions.

And watch out for Cyndy Violette and Kathy Liebert, an expert at throwing off opposing players with her quizzical expressions and the first woman to take home $1 million in a poker tournament.

Mirroring poker¡¯s national surge in popularity, the main event at the World Series of Poker has grown dramatically among both men and women. Three years ago, only 631 people registered to play.

But since then poker has exploded, thanks to the game being dealt into homes through nightly TV shows and a pair of poker phenoms who learned how to play on the Internet and won in 2003 and 2004.

Suddenly, one of the most difficult card games became accessible, and anyone willing to practice could become a winner ¡ª a big winner.

Also, Harrah¡¯s Entertainment Inc., the largest gambling company in the world, bought the rights to the World Series of Poker and created the popular championship circuit. Company officials decided to move the tournament to the Rio¡¯s cavernous convention hall and announced this will be the last year the finals are held at the historic Binion¡¯s Gambling Hall & Hotel.

Cowboy gambler Benny Binion began the poker tournament in 1970 to establish the world¡¯s best player. Then, only grizzled veterans stood a chance of being crowned king. Binion probably never imagined a woman could win the World Series of Poker¡¯s most prized bracelet.

Last year, Suzanne Carpenter finished 21st among the 2,576 contestants who entered the main event ¡ª which requires a $10,000 buy-in. Women made up about 5 percent of the 2004 field, said Nolan Dalla, the tournament¡¯s media director.

Dalla expects that figure to rise slightly this year, meaning the top women players still face very long odds.

¡°We are all very competitive,¡± said Liebert, who won a ¡°Battle of the Sexes¡± episode on the Game Show Network in March. ¡°It¡¯s a long shot for anybody. You gotta play your best game and you can¡¯t be afraid to lose.¡±

Even winning this year¡¯s ladies no-limit hold ¡¯em event that had more than 600 entrees ¡ª almost three times the number in 2004 ¡ª was no easy task. Actress Jennifer Tilly took the title and $158,625 on June 27 by topping Liebert and Violette.

Liebert and Violette both have finished in the money in some of the other World Series of Poker events held in Las Vegas in the days leading up to the main draw. Violette won $295,970 in a $2,000 no-limit hold¡¯ em showdown after finishing second among 1,403 players.

Such success at the table has earned women players respect ¡ª sometimes grudgingly ¡ª from men.

Duke no longer has to endure a guy sticking his tongue in her ear or others making sexually charged comments ¡ª unsavory tales from her poker past.

¡°I¡¯m easy to yell at because I¡¯m not going to beat you up,¡± said Duke, a mother of four who graduated from Columbia University and went on to study cognitive psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.

Duke said men like to think they can steamroll women and it¡¯s ¡°odious¡± to them to lose to a woman player. Those attitudes can create advantages and disadvantages in a woman¡¯s game, according to Negreanu.

¡°The average woman overcompensates and is too aggressive,¡± he said. ¡°They often assume men are trying to bully them. The key for women, they have to gauge which ones are the male chauvinists.¡±

When facing a woman, men fall into two traps, he said.

¡°They play nice-nice with women or resent the fact the women are there,¡± Negreanu said.

They play nice, Duke added, thinking they can get a date.

Harman¡¯s ability to read her fellow players makes her the favorite among the women.

She plays at the Bellagio hotel-casino in Las Vegas, home to some intense poker games. Some nights she¡¯ll gamble a half-million dollars of her own money. She doesn¡¯t blink when it comes to raising someone a few hundred thousand dollars.

¡°I have very good instincts,¡± she said. ¡°I play in the highest cash games in the world against the best pros in the world. You have to have instincts. I can size up eight or nine players in no less than a half hour.¡±

Even with that, Harman, Duke and the other women will need more than ability if they want to make history. As with the men, they¡¯ll need Lady Luck.

¡°You have to be very patient to win this tournament,¡± Duke said, ¡°and get really lucky.¡±

  door: 2005-07-03 11:52:53

For Many, Path to Big One Begins With Low Stake
Eight Texas road gamblers were all who dared enter the World Series of Poker in 1972. That was the event's third year but the first time the buy-in reached $10,000. Thirty-three years later the buy-in to the main event remains the same, but more than 6,000 are expected to enter next week. What gave all these people the courage?

Inflation, advice books, online poker and hole-card cameras have all been big factors, but the explosion of entries was initially ignited by Eric Drache, the first director of the World Series. Mr. Drache understood that a bona fide world championship needed more than eight pretenders, so in the mid-1970's he began spreading $1,000 one-table satellites, feeder tournaments in which one player earned a seat at the Big One. Players with day jobs and limited bankrolls began to show up at the World Series every spring. In 1983, a Grand Rapids accountant named Tom McEvoy became the first satellite qualifier to win the main event, taking home $540,000 for defeating 107 opponents.

These days, more than half the field of any major event have earned their seats in a dizzying variety of satellites offered in card rooms on land and online. With buy-ins as low as $1, there are satellites to get into a satellite to get into a satellite. If the odds seem outlandish, consider that four of the last five World Series champions won their seats in feeder events.

In 2003 a Nashville accountant, Chris Moneymaker, parlayed a $39 Internet satellite entry into the $2.5 million first prize. Last year Greg Raymer, a patent attorney, won a $150 double shootout online, beating successive virtual tables of nine actual opponents each to win a seat, then outlasted a field of 2,576 to take home $5 million.

In live one-table satellites, held during major tournaments, the math is relatively straightforward: Luck and skill being equal, each competitor is a 9-1 underdog. Multi-table supersatellites allowing rebuys unbalance this equity and tend to become all-in fests with mediocre players shoving in their entire stack before the flop and hoping for the best; if they lose, they reload and keep firing.

This year at the Rio in Las Vegas there were one-table satellites priced as low as $125, but the most cost-effective routes to the Big One were the $1,030 events. For only $5 more in juice than in $525 events, players started with $5,000 in tournament chips, as opposed to $2,000, giving them two and a half times as much play.

In winner-take-the-seat formats, deals are often struck when three or two players remain. With two similar chip counts, for example, one player may take the seat and pay his opponent half its value. Before the World Poker Tour championship in April, the Bellagio offered a sweet variation with less than 1 percent juice. Players ponied up $3,000 apiece and began with $25,000 in tournament chips. The winner got a $25,500 seat plus $200 in cash; second place paid $4,100.

Since the goal is to advance players into the main event, satellite winners don't have the option of taking first prize in cash - unless they already have an entry receipt, in which case they are paid the extra seat's value in cash. This way, a talented specialist can win the equivalent of several seats per tournament.

Most one-table satellites also generate last-longer side bets. I have seen all 10 players at a table take part in these pools, though five or six is more typical. At the Bellagio the side bets were $500, giving the survivor a bonus of $3,000 or so, or a not-bad third prize by itself. In the Rio's $1,030 satellites, they were usually $200.

Some players shun last-longer action because busting out early isn't necessarily a bad thing in terms of overall strategy. Amir Vahedi, a Tehran native who fought in the Iran-Iraq war and is currently ranked seventh in the world by Card Player (and has his own cigar-chomping bobblehead), explains, "In order to live in a no-limit tournament, you have to be willing to die."

Going for broke can work just as well in a satellite. If opponents deduce that you're bent on lasting longer, as opposed to winning outright, they'll steal too many pots in which you don't hold the nuts. When scare cards come - when, as in the hand shown above, the community cards make a flush likely - a tough player will often raise on the river with any old hand, assuming you'll fold your two pairs or even three of a kind.

Unless a surefire tell reveals she's not bluffing, you may have to show her you're willing to die with a reraise. It's the kind of big risk you often have to take in order to beat nine other players. Finishing near the middle of the pack can be modestly profitable in side games, but with satellite money reserved for one or two spots, what's the point of hanging on to place fourth?

One answer is that cautiously preserving your chips while rivals are eliminated can land you a seat, but you are more likely to win in attack mode. In future columns I'll discuss what primers by Mr. McEvoy and others have to say about tactics and deal-making, and interview some flourishing satellite specialists.

  door: 2005-07-04 12:58:41

At this World Series, a full house is expected
Mention of the World Series once exclusively evoked runs, hits and errors.

But that's the old World Series.

The new World Series, at least new in the consciousness of millions of Americans, has a far different lexicon: flop, turn and river. Also, all-in, on tilt and bad beat.

The 36th World Series of Poker, the marquee event of the card craze that has saturated TV and even elbowed its way onto sports pages, begins its championship finale Thursday at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas with an expected record-shattering field of 6,600 competitors. With each occupied seat representing a $10,000 buy-in, the total prize pool will be more than $62 million. The winner will earn $7.4 million, and every player who survives to the final table of nine will walk away a millionaire.

The main event, the $10,000 No-limit Texas Hold 'em World Championship, is actually the denouement of a series of 45 individual poker tournaments of varying styles and buy-ins, which will have a total prize pool exceeding $100 million. That makes the six-week WSOP probably the richest competition in the country, outstripping most major golf tournaments, horse races and prize fights - and certainly the players' share of that other World Series.

"Nobody knows what the future of poker will be," said Chris "Jesus" Ferguson, whose black cowboy hat and beard help make him one of the more recognizable stars on the card-playing scene. "But no one - not the game's biggest promoters - could have predicted this."

Entries for this year's final event, which will run for about 10 days, are more than double last year's field of more than 2,500, and that group tripled the previous year of 839.

The 2003 championship was the seminal occasion for poker's run to pop culture obsession when a then-unknown, 27-year-old accountant from Tennessee with the Dickensian name of Chris Moneymaker won $2.5 million and the coveted gold bracelet that goes with any WSOP victory after he had qualified for the tournament with a $39 investment in an Internet satellite game.

That a player with virtually no big-time experience and a meager starting stake could catapult to rock star status helped touch off a poker-playing frenzy that reaches from the world's ritziest casinos to high school lunchrooms and college dorms.

Orin Starn, a Duke University professor who teaches a course in sports anthropology, said the rise of poker speaks to broader societal mores and values.

"Sports don't gain or lose popularity in a vacuum," Starn said. "They respond to some development in American culture."

Starn pointed to basketball as a game that enjoyed an unexpected surge. "It was invented in 1891 and by the early 20th century, it was broadly accepted and it stuck," the professor said.

That game's introduction coincided with an increasingly sedentary society's recognition of fitness and exercise, and it could be played indoors.

"So why poker now?" Starn said. "For one [thing], it fits with an American fascination with winner-take-all. Poker is a place where people are dealing with huge sums of money, jackpots. You can get rich overnight."

Plus, Starn said, the game's TV success is consistent with the current appeal of all types of reality TV.

Here for a while?

The question is whether, like basketball, poker is here for the long haul or simply a fad.

"Unlike the hula-hoop, poker is something that has been with us a long time," said Steve Moore, a senior vice president with IMG, an international sports representation and marketing firm whose clients include Tiger Woods, Peyton Manning and Maria Sharapova.

"Poker has just been latent and behind closed doors. If you played, maybe you didn't talk about it. But here we have something that really has been popular all along and now it has a Good Housekeeping Seal. It's all right to play and talk about it, and it's even being considered a quasi-sport."

But like all sudden successes, such as hot real estate markets or dot-com stocks, the game's popularity bubble raises concerns.

"Will it hit a zenith in terms of TV viewership? I think it will," Moore said. "I'm not sure it will become mainstream."

For now, though, poker's surging popularity has reached huge proportions, especially among young people - a grave concern to those who work in gambling addiction.

"The primary reason it appeals to young people is the way it has been glamorized and promoted," said Keith Whyte, executive director for the National Council on Problem Gambling.

"We never had TV celebrating these [poker] celebrities and bringing the excitement and perceived skill. The glamour has not been accompanied by responsible messages."

Plus, the Internet - a landscape with which young people are comfortable - has been the entry point for many new poker players. "They start by playing for play money and when they think they're good enough, they move to real money," Whyte said.

"Even a decade ago, you wouldn't see advertising for gambling, let alone a whole show," Whyte added. "It's part of the shift that gambling is ubiquitous and the public acceptance of gambling in general.

Poker, in particular, recently took a step toward greater legitimacy within the media when The New York Times began running a weekly column on the game's strategy, players and lore in its sports pages. That follows a column already appearing in the Chicago Tribune.

Last year, when another little-known player, Connecticut patent attorney Greg Raymer, won $5 million in the World Series of Poker championship, only a handful of mainstream media reporters were there.

This year, more than 500 media credentials have been issued.

TV ratings for World Series of Poker games televised on ESPN - which are taped - rival viewership for some top live NBA matchups, although still far behind the NFL. And other networks that have TV poker, such as the Travel Channel with the World Poker Tour and Bravo, which airs Celebrity Poker Showdown, also enjoy solid ratings.

Television isn't the only thing new about the card game that was integral to frontier lore and a favorite pastime of Harry Truman. The WSOP, like much of the poker world, is going through a transition.

The tournament was born in old-time casino owner Benny Binion's gritty Horseshoe gambling hall in downtown Las Vegas, where the first winner in 1970, Johnny Moss, was voted the top player by his fellow pros.

The former Horseshoe, now simply called Binion's, doesn't even belong to Benny's family these days, and the tournament has been bought by gaming industry behemoth Harrah's Entertainment. Harrah's has moved the World Series from its venerable cradle to the swanky Rio, just off the Las Vegas Strip. This year, for the last time, just the final two days of the tournament will be played at Binion's, a nostalgic nod to the city's centennial observance.

Moving, moving ...

Most of the World Series action is being played in a newly built conference center called the Pavilion, which a tournament publicist referred to as a "poker arena." And there's a nearby virtual mall of vendors selling poker-related apparel, equipment and instructional materials, mirroring a poker retail blitz that began last December when retailers from Wal-Mart to Neiman Marcus began offering poker-playing sets and accessories.

The most substantial difference in New Age poker, though, is its players. Internet play in virtual poker rooms has introduced millions to the game worldwide and offered an opportunity to learn in a matter of months what it used to take pros years to master. The last two champions, Moneymaker and Raymer, won their seats in the main event in online qualifiers, and four players at last year's final table were from one Web site, PokerStars.com.

This year, PokerStars is expected to have close to 1,000 players in the championship; that's more competitors than in the entire field of the 2003 title tournament.

The advent of so many new faces has created a problem for poker's loosely knit establishment. While the likelihood of an unknown winning poker's richest prize reinforces the reverie of TV viewers that they can replicate the accomplishment, it works against building a cast of identifiable characters with whom fans can forge loyalties, such as familiar pros Ferguson, Doyle "Texas Dolly" Brunson, Phil "Poker Brat" Hellmuth, Howard "The Professor" Lederer, Phil Ivey and Annie Duke.

Still familiar

Interestingly, even though many of this year's preliminary games - which started June 2 - have had fields that sometimes exceeded 2,000, the names and faces that fans have grown to know have frequently prevailed.

Brunson, at the age of 72, won a 10th gold bracelet and $367,000 in a Hold 'em tournament Friday. A few days earlier, Johnny Chan, the last person to win back-to-back world championships, also picked up a 10th bracelet and $303,000. Ivey won his fifth gold bracelet and $630,000 at a final table that included Hellmuth in a game called Omaha. And 65-year-old T.J. Cloutier got his sixth bracelet and pocketed $657,000 after a No-limit Hold 'em victory.

In Texas Hold 'em, each player is dealt two cards, and five more are community cards that can be used by all players to make the best possible five-card poker hand. The rules give rise to an expression - any two cards can win.

And while that notion has helped drive the game's swell in popularity reflected in this year's enormous World Series of Poker turnout, the triumphs of Brunson and his fellow pros are a sobering reminder to the wide-eyed "wannabe" card sharks that it still matters a great deal who holds those two cards.

  door: 2005-07-04 12:59:54

Pocket aces are no guarantee
The 2005 WSOP (World Series of Poker) got under way with a record field last month at the Rio Hotel in Las Vegas.

The first event, a $1,500 buy-in no-limit hold 'em tournament, opened with 2,305 players.

First place was roughly $700,000, and 200 players would make the money. I'm proud to say that I was one of those who made the money, which was my record-tying 46th ''cash'' (qualifying for prize money) at the WSOP. In fact, with about 60 players left I was the chip leader, but I finished a disappointing 24th.

Allow me to discuss the sickening hand I witnessed during the second day of the first tournament. With 236 players left (200 would make the money), a $100 ante and $400-$800 blinds, Jason Steinhorn opened in first position with 10-10. In the second position Ralph Levine made it $10,000 to go with his A-A. And now Greg Smallowitz, third, made a great fold with his J-J.

As if having A-A, J-J, and 10-10 out there in a single hand wasn't enough, I held 7-7 in the fourth position and folded.

Now Jim Lester picked up K-K in the sixth position and moved all-in with it for $21,600. Emad Alabsi picked up the other pair of 10s in seventh position and eventually folded. It came down to Jeff Shulman in the big blind (final position) -- he showed me his K-Q after he folded because I said that I was writing a column about this hand. And we still hadn't got to the flop.

Now Steinhorn made the easy decision of folding his 10-10, and Levine called all of his remaining chips with his A-A, which is the best possible hand before the flop in Texas Hold 'em. Knowing that Shulman had folded K-Q, I then announced that Lester had only one king left in the deck to draw to. Normally, a bigger pair is a 4 ½-1 favorite over the smaller pair, but in this case, with three kings already gone, the aces were more like a 10-1 favorite over the kings. After a flop of 6-6-4, the turn card was the ''case'' king (the fourth card of a particular rank), giving Jim Lester the winning hand!

Ralph needed an ace on the river for a measure of justice, but, alas, it was not to be for him. The river card was a harmless seven (which would have made me a full house!). Everyone in this hand played well. J-J, 10-10, 10-10, 7-7, and K-Q all hit the muck, and A-A and K-K both put all of their money in pre-flop. Tough luck for Ralph, but that's poker!

WSOP HIGHLIGHTS

• I participated in the $1,500 buy-in limit hold 'em, which fielded more than 1,100 players. Again, I had the chip lead late and faded, finishing 44th, but I did manage to break the all-time ''cashes'' record with 47. (To follow all of this record-breaking madness live, go to CardPlay er.com for daily blogs until July 15.)

• One of the themes so far at the 2005 WSOP is that the pros are winning most of the tournaments, despite the enormous fields. In fact, the first event came down to four top pros, with Scott Fishman finishing second and Alan Cunningham winning it. Eric Seidel won his seventh WSOP bracelet, and T.J. Cloutier won his sixth (and in the process passed me for No. 2 on the all-time money list -- his $3.7 million to my $3.6 million -- with reigning world champion Greg Raymer holding the lead at $5 million).

• The $10,000 buy-in main event, the most prestigious tournament in poker, will get under way Thursday. More than 5,000 people have signed up. Somewhere between 6,600 and 10,000 players are expected.

When should you fold K-K before the flop?

A. When someone else moves all-in.

B. Quite often.

C. Almost never.

D. Your first hand of a tournament

  door: 2005-07-04 18:34:18

'All in' for a round of poker
For 20-year-old Roger Dona, the poker craze has been a mixed blessing.

Dona, who started playing 7-card stud with his friends at Kaiser High School about five years ago, admits he's a little irked at how often he's dismissed as some rounder-come-lately, just another college kid glomming onto a fad that has passed the flop, the turn and the river into the American mainstream.

Yet Dona happily allows that the phenomenal popularity of the game has significantly deepened the pool of willing players. As poker buffs statewide have come to learn, it's never been so easy to find a game in Hawai'i.

On any given night in the Islands, poker is played, legally and illegally, in living rooms and garages, bars and barracks, by family, friends and acquaintances of all stripes. Dozens of home games are advertised on sites like homepokergames.com. Solo gamblers also turn to Internet "Meet Up" groups to find games and gambling buddies.

"If all these new players weren't here," Dona laughs, "I wouldn't be up (in earnings) right now."

Dona's pal Justin Itano echoes the sentiment.

"I almost don't like how mainstream the game has gotten," says Itano, also 20. "But it helps me get games, so in that sense it's great."

Dona and Itano are part of an emerging generation of young players immersing themselves in the game. Along the way, they have the ardent encouragement of a $40 billion gaming industry and an increasingly interested roster of opportunistic entertainment programmers and product merchandisers.

Between work and school (Dona is finishing up the medical assistant program at Kapi'olani Community College, and Itano attends the University of Hawai'i), the two friends make time for a couple of games a week, on top of a few hours practicing at online poker sites.

They usually keep the wagers small, preferring the fun of competition over the more sober business of making money. And while they'd rather learn the game from live play rather than from the growing body of instructional books and videos flooding the market, they do watch their share of TV tournaments — and they're familiar with all of the high-profile professional players.

"I just think it's fun," Itano says. "It's something to do."

Birth of the cool

Industry observers typically point to 2003 as the take off point for the ongoing poker boom, the dot on the graph from which industry profit lines arc to the heavens.

That was the first year that ESPN produced the "World Series of Poker" and — in a stroke of amazing dramatic fortune — the year an amateur Internet player named Chris Moneymaker parlayed a $40 investment in a satellite tournament into a $2.5 million first-place finish at the series.

Moneymaker's fairy-tale win epitomized one of the most compelling — some say dangerous — lures of modern tournament play: Anyone can win.

"Anyone who plays is essentially the next potential millionaire, the next Chris Moneymaker," says Eric Morris, co-founder and publisher of Bluff Magazine.

"I'm a huge baseball fan, but I'm not talented enough or in shape enough to ever be a pro," Morris says. "But with poker, I'm one tournament away from being a professional and winning a million dollars."

Moneymaker's march to the final table was made all the more compelling by the use of the "lipstick camera."

Developed by Henry Orenstein and introduced to poker audiences by the Travel Channel's "World Poker Tour," the tiny, tableside camera allowed viewers to see the players' cards and follow along with each strategic bluff, call or fold.

"Watching a game without knowing what the cards are is like watching paint dry," Morris says. "Now the viewer is more involved. It's more interactive.

"That was really the defining point," Morris says.

In fact, the success of the "World Series of Poker," the "World Poker Tour" and the host of similar programs that followed over the next two years is directly attributable to significant improvements in orientation, storytelling and presentation.

The lipstick camera made it possible for commentators to more fully explain the logic behind each player's moves. That, along with a full explanation of the basic rules in each episode and on-screen calculations of each player's odds, allowed poker newbies to quickly grasp the action while providing insight to more experienced viewers.

The programs also took a cue from professional sports, emphasizing individual personalities as a way of engaging viewers on a personal level.

It wasn't so long ago that poker seemed hopelessly passe, with its image of overweight, stogie-chomping men in bad clothes sweating over piles of plastic chips. Yet while the stereotypes still walk the kitchens and the casinos (stogies unlit), the face of the modern game has changed considerably.

The inherent drama of head-to-head matchups coupled with slick profile packages made it easy for viewers to get to know a diverse set of characters, from the Southern elder statesman Doyle Brunson to young African-American Phil Ivey, from women's poker icon Annie Duke to a half-dozen guys named Nguyen.

"They're like Hollywood celebrities," Morris says. "Poker is seen as hip right now. It's associated with being cool."

Businesses all in

While exact figures are impossible to determine, the industry estimates that 60 million to 80 million people nationwide now play poker with some regularity.

And Americans aren't just playing, they're watching and buying all things poker, as well.

The "World Series of Poker" had fewer than 850 entrants in 2003. This year, there are more than 6,600 players competing for a projected first-place prize of $7.4 million.

The "World Poker Tour" is the Travel Channel's highest rated show, drawing as many as 5 million viewers a week — significant numbers for a cable channel. (See "Where to Watch," Page D1)

In addition to the professional tournaments and celebrity poker programs crowding network and cable television, poker is also finding its way into scripted series' (ESPN's "Tilt") and commercials (Coke Zero).

It's no surprise that ESPN's online store has a designated poker area offering items like ceramic chip sets, dealer shoes and poker apparel. But other businesses with less obvious ties to the game are also finding poker an easy sell.

FTD, the floral delivery service, sells a leather travel poker set for $29.99. For Father's Day, Rival Flowers.com countered with a "Deal Me In" arrangement that included a dozen carnations and a deck of cards.

Poker specialty sites have also popped up in recent months offering everything from custom poker tables to specialty sunglasses that "reveal nothing" during games, to Greg "Fossilman" Raymer bobbleheads.

Local retail stores have also gotten a boost from poker-related sales. Longs Drugs did brisk business selling specialty poker tables. Earlier this year, O'ahu Costco stores sold out of their 500-chip sets in a matter of days.

When they're not playing, poker buffs seem to be doing a lot of reading — from pro-penned instruction books to a selection of niche periodicals.

Morris and partner Eddy Kleid launched their poker magazine Bluff late last year. Their distribution increased from 90,000 in October 2004 to 245,000 last month.

In addition to a two-hour satellite radio show, Bluff is also involved in developing a fantasy poker game and a professional tour. Morris estimates the company will make about $5 million in profits this year.

Net gains

One of the biggest drivers of the poker craze has been the lightning growth of Internet poker.

According to pokerpulse.com, the amount of money wagered daily on Internet poker sites jumped from $11 million in 2003 to nearly $200 million this year.

According to the Interactive Gaming Council, Americans account for up to 65 percent of Internet casino business.

Many online poker sites are based outside of the country and use escrow accounts to process payments. Some sites allow visitors to play for free. It is illegal to bet on these sites from Hawai'i, regardless of where the site is based.

"The Internet is one of the main reasons why we have this level of participation and marketability," Morris says. "Without it, the World Series of Poker would probably only have 1,000 players."

Local traditions

While Hawai'i is one of only two states that does not allow gambling establishments of any kind (Utah is the other), gambling has long been a part of the local culture. (See box, "The Rules," this page.)

Dean Alegado, chairman of the UH ethnic studies department, points to early immigrant groups that each brought wagering games such as cockfighting and pepito (a version of stud poker).

"A lot of these were single men working on the plantations and living in (racially segregated) camps," Alegado says. "They had their recreation, and gambling was part of that."

At times, gambling raised tensions between Christians from the West and the Native Hawaiian or immigrant population. Queen Lili'uokalani once approved a lottery to help alleviate an economic recession (without resorting to annexation by the United States) and was criticized for supporting gambling.

While measures that would allow gambling in the state have been continually introduced and rejected, many Hawai'i residents are enthusiastic and unapologetic gamblers.

"That's what Vegas is for, right?" says Pearl City resident Shelby Nakamura, 35. "You just go there a couple of times a year so you can play legally, and you keep it in check."

After months of practicing with friends and family, Nakamura sat down for her first Las Vegas poker game two months ago.

"It freaked me out," Nakamura says. "It's totally different, with a real dealer and with everyone staring you down. I don't know how those guys on TV can stand it."

Nakamura learned Texas Hold 'Em, the default poker game of most TV tournaments, by watching the "World Poker Tour" on TV.

"I don't know any other games," she said. "I barely even know that one."

The fact that so many new players are introduced to the game through TV tournaments has led to a strange sort of uniformity in recreational play.

"Playing cards in Hawai'i used to be different," says Mark Uyehara. "The way we learned from our fathers and uncles and aunties was different. They made up their own games. You don't see these games in Vegas, but most people in Hawai'i know how to play them. Now, but, it's all Texas Hold 'Em."

Uyehara says he watches TV tournaments and tries to glean what he can — not that it always helps. "You watch to see what you should do. ... They have all these rules for what to do in each situation. But you're playing, you're not playing with pros.

"Guys will do some weird things."

  door: 2005-07-04 18:36:19

Former software developer Pat Poels wins WSOP $1500 Limit Omaha High-Low event

June 08, 2005
Oliver Tse
Pat Poels
Former software developer turned professional poker player Pat Poels of Mesa, Arizona outlast a field of 699 players to win the World Series of Poker (WSOP) $1500 buy-in Limit Omaha High-Low Eight-or-Better Event at the Rio Pavilion Convention Center.

Poels earned $270,100, a record first prize for a land-based Omaha High-Low tournament, and the coveted gold bracelet.

Poels, who had played over 2000 hours of poker each year since 2001, quit his software development job in April to play poker full time.

"My wife is the one who pushed me into it," said the 37-year-old father of three to WSOP Media Director Nolan Dalla after the tournament, which ended at approximately 3:30am.

In a heads-up battle that lasted 29 hands, Poels eliminated John Lukas of Las Vegas on Hand 191. With limits at 15000-30000, Poels raised from the button and Lukas called. Both checked the flop of Kc 6s 6h. Lukas bet the turn card of Ts and Poels called. Lukas put his remaining 5000 chips all-in on the river when the 8d hit the board and Poels called instantly, turning over 9d 7c 8c 5h for a 10-high straight. Lukas could only produce two-pair when he turned over Tc 8s Js 9h.

Lukas receives $139,870 for his 2nd place finish.

Poels survived elimination several times during the first day of play during level 6 with limits at 300-600, coming back from being down to 300 chips at the start of level 6 to being 6th position out of 22 at the end of Day 1. He started the final table of 10 in 5th position and built his chip stack while other players faltered.

Jeff Duvall of London, England was one of the players who faltered down the stretch. Duvall lost 285000 chips during the first 6 hands of play at the 15000-30000 limits to finish in 3rd place.

Duvall was eliminated on Hand 162 by Lukas. In a 3-way unraised pot, Duvall bet the flop of 5c Tc Jh and both Poels and Lukas called. Duvall called his last 20000 chips all-in after Lucas bet the turn card of 2d. With the Td on the river, Duvall's two pair of Tens and Fives with a Queen was outkicked by Lukas, who made two pair of Tens and Fives with a King.

Duvall took home $77,170 for finishing 3rd.

Bahram Kianfar of Palm Desert, California lost most of his chips on Hand 148 against Poels. Poels raised under the gun and Kianfar called. On the flop of Ks js 3d, Kianfar bet, Poels raised, and Kianfar called. Kianfar check-called bets by Poels on the turn card of Kh and on the river card of 2h. Poels turned over Kc Jh 8h Ah to make Kings Full of Jacks while Kianfar mucked his hand claiming that he could only make three-of-a kind.

Kianfar was eliminated in 4th place on Hand 152 by Duvall when Kianfar went all-in for his remaining 25000 chips holding Kd 9c 4s 2c against Duvall's Ah Kc 7d Tc. The board of As Kh 9s Qc 7s made Aces and Kings or Duvall against Kings and Nines for Kianfar.

Poker pros "Minneapolis" Jim Meehan and Dan Heimuller were eliminated in consecutive hands at the 10000-20000 limits.

The colorful Meehan was eliminated in 6th place on Hand 122 by Duvall. Meehan raised to open before the flop and Duvall called from the big blind. On the flop of 4d 8c 3c, Duball bet, Meehan raised, and Duvall called. Meehan call his remaining 5000 chips on the turn card of 3h. Duvall turned over 8h 3s Tc 2h for Eights Full of Treys and a possible low draw while Meehan turned over Ah 7c Qh 4h. The Ac on the river gave Duvall a better 7-4-3-2-A low against Meehan's 8-7-4-3-A low to allow Duvall the scoop the pot. Meehan departed with a prize of $48,230.

Heimuller was eliminated on Hand 123. Kianfar raised to open before the flop and both Lukas and Heimuller called. On the flop of Kc 7s 5h, Heimuller checked, Kianfar bet, Lucas called, and Heimuller called. Heimuller called his remaining 5000 chips all-in on the turn card of 4c. Lucas bet and Kainfar called on the river card of Th. Kianfar made two-pair Kings and Tens with Kd Td Ad 4s, Lukas had nut low with Ah 2d 3c 4d, and Heimuller showed 2s 3h 8s Kh before mucking his hand. Heimuller earned $57,875 for his 5th place finish.

Darrell Dicken of Waterloo, Iowas, who started the final table with the chip lead, was bluffed out of a pot on Hand 62 by Duvall at the 6000-12000 limits. Duvall raised to open before the flop, Dicken called, and Kianfar called. On the flop of 2h Qh Td, Duvall bet and both Dicken and kianfar called. Duvall bet the turn card of 6h, Dicken raised, Kianfar folded, and Duvall called. When the scare card of Th hit the board on the river, Duvall bet and Dicken folded. Duvall turned over A-2-3-4 for a complete bluff.

Dicken then lost a big pot to Duvall at the 8000-16000 limits on Hand 79. Dicken raised to open before the flop and Duvall called from the big blind. Duvall check-called Dicken bet the flop of 8h 2h 3c and Duvall check-called Dicken's bet the turn with the Tc. Duvall bet the river card of 3d and Dicken called. Duvall made three-of-a-kind with As 3s 5s Kh and an 8-5-3-2-A low while Dicken could only produce A-A-Q-J for two pair with no low.

Dicken was eliminated by Meehan on hand 81 when Dicken went all-in from the small blind with his remaining 16000 chips and Meehan called from the big blind. Dicken's Ah 2s 7h 9d missed both the low draw and an open-ended straight draw on the flop of 8h 3c Tc when the Th hit the board on the turn and the Qs fell on the river. Meehan produced As 6s 9s 9c for two pair Tens and Nines.

Dicken exited with a prize of 38,585.

Boris Shats of Los Angeles lost most of his chips on Hand 37 with limits at 5000-10000. Kianfar and Dicken called before the flop, Shats raised from the big blind, and both Kianfar and Dicken called. On a flop of As 2c Tc, Dicken checked, Shats bet, Kianfar raised, Dicken re-raised, Shats called, and Kianfar called. When the turn card of Qc hit the board, Dicken bet, Shats called, Kianfar raised, Dicken called, and Shats folded. Dicken checked the river card of 4s, Kianfar bet, and Dicken folded to yield the pot of 130000 to Kianfar.

Shats was eliminated in 8th place on Hand 45 with limits at 6000-12000. Heimiller raised to open, Lukas called, Shats re-raised from the big blind, Heimiller and Lukas both called. On the flop of 4c 9s Qd, Shats bet, Heimiller raised, Lukas folded, and Shats called for a total of 7000. Heimiller turned over Ad Qh 9d 4s for two-pair while Shats turned over As Ah 6d Td. Sharts cold not improve on the turn with the 7h and the river with the Ts. Shats collected $28.940 for his 8th place finish.

The two short stacks at the 10-handed final table were eliminated in successive hands played at limits of 4000-8000.

French poker pro Pascal Perrault was eliminated in 10th place on Hand 5 by Dicken. Dicken put Perrault's remaining 13000 all-in after a series of raises and re-raises before the flop. Dicken's Jc Jd 5s 4h scooped the pot against Perrault's Qs 6s 3h 2h on a board of 2h 8h 9h As Kd. Perrault exited the tournament with $10,610.

Southern California-based poker pro Minh Nguyen was eliminated in 9th place on Hand 6 by Meehan. Nguyen raised before the flop and Meehan called from the big blind. On a flop of Js 9h 6c, Meehan put Nguyen's remaining 14000 all-in after a series of raises and re-raises. Meehan showed 9s 6s Tc 8h for two-pair while Nguyen showed Ac Qs Qh Jc for one pair of Queens. Nguyen got no help from the 5h on the turn and the 4d on the river. Nguyen earned $19,290.

WSOP Event 5 $1500 Limit Omaha High-Low Eight-or-Better Final Table Results

Place Player Hometown Prize
1 Pat Poels Mesa, Arizona $270,100
2 John Lukas Las Vegas, Nevada $139,870
3 Jeff Duvall London, England $77,170
4 Bahram Kianfar Palm Desert, California $67,525
5 Dan Heimiller Plymouth, Michigan $57,875
6 Jim Meehan Minneapolis, Minnesota $48,230
7 Darrell Dicken Waterloo, Iowa $38,585
8 Boris Shats Los Angeles, California $28,940
9 Minh Nguyen Lake Elsinore, California $19,290
10 Pascal Perrault Paris, France $10,610

  door: 2005-07-04 20:53:36

The Business of Poker: Interview with Scott Wilson

June 09, 2005
John Caldwell
Scott Wilson
Scott Wilson has been at Paradise Poker for five years, as Paradise was one of the first online poker sites on the web, and continues to be one of the leading sites in the increasingly crowded world of online poker. In this interview, Scott talks about the current state of online poker, and what life is like in Paradise.

PN: Where do you feel Paradise Poker is in the marketplace today, and where do you think it will be in two years time.

The market when I was first in this, we represented 50% of the market numerically. There was basically us, Planet Poker, and the Highlands Club back in 2000. And very quickly, we had 80% of that market. Now, we're easily ten times the size that we were back then, but we represent single figures in terms of market share. It really shows you what has happened to this market. If you decline from 80% to single digits, market share wise but you grow ten fold...it really shows you that there is something going on here.

PN: So, two years from now, where is it going?

SW: Well, its gotten to the point where the market is saturated with online poker sites, I would say. From those original two or three rooms, you now are at about 500 rooms. Many of these are skins, and parts of networks etc, but I would say there has to be some consolidation in the market place. I say this with bias, because obviously we were consolidated.

We felt in order to stay competitive in the market, and take advantage of some synergies that were offered to us by hooking up with another company, we had to make that move in order to stay competitive with the networks that were growing pretty fast. You have Cryptologic, and Prima Poker and that type of model. Although those aren't as profitable as stand alone operators, if you want to be competitive as far as you what you can offer for prize pools, and you must have this critical mass of 10,000 players or so a night to do that. We are there now, and are quite proud of the progress we have made.

We are sending 200 + players to the WSOP, and between us, Party, and Stars, I think that will represent 1/3 of the field.

PN: You just had your huge event, the Masters Two last week. Talk about how that went, and what plans are in store for more of these types of events.

SW: Exactly. We did Masters one a couple months back, and guaranteed $1,000,000, then we just did Masters two, and pushed the prize pool to $1.5 million. We actually added about $200,000 to that prize pool.

We are doing Masters III on September 17th, and the prize pool will be over $1,000,000. We will also shoot number three for television.

PN: Talk about the transition since the Sportingbet acquisition, and how this will effect Paradise players, as well as the company itself.

SW: Other than a couple companies who started as a sports book, and now offer an inferior in my opinion poker product to what we have, we now are offering a sports book product at Paradise. Also, this is a known, longtime online book, Sportsbook.com so people can trust their money there. Within a couple months, players will be able to transition pretty seamlessly between the sportsbook, and the poker side. Pretty much everyone is trying poker these days, as everyone thinks they are good at poker, so we feel we will have a big influx of players to the Paradise site.

So, we will give players a lot of choice. This new flexibility will allow players more options, and the new influx of players from the sportsbook.com side will maybe be not as mature or developed as players, which will be a big advantage to current Paradise players.

PN: In your position, what will your goals be toward effecting positive change in the online gaming world.

SW: When a customer comes in, and has a problem, we want to make sure that we deal with it appropriately. For example, when we are done with this, I have a longtime customer who has a problem, and I am going to call him myself. I think it is that serious of an issue. This is a longtime player, and this is a serious issue, so I feel the personal contact is worth it.

PN: What do you see as the future of online gaming? Do you see more acquisitions? Rooms merging? Rooms folding?

SW: I don't know about outright folding. Customer base is pretty tough to establish these days. In the early days, we could get players on a per click ad basis for pennies. For the price of a Kool Aid, we were getting new customers. Now, that is just not an option.

If you are a new company, or a similar type of company, and you want to start a poker operation, you have a few choices. You can go out and saddle up to a skin type "white label" operation, or you can acquire somebody. I think as we get more down the line, and some of the mid level operators lose interest, or stop wanting to fighting the good fight, there probably will be some opportunities for larger companies to swallow up those big fish. I do think we are near the height of the number of poker rooms that are out there. Why would you play at a place with four tables, when you can play at a place with 400, and have giant prize pools, etc.

PN: From a software/user perspective, what will the average user be seeing in their online gaming experience five years from now.

That's a tough one to figure out. Its tough to see what players are showing an interest in. When we initially came out, we were really fearing this one room that had fantastic graphics, and we felt people were going to flock to this particular site, as the visual experience was fantastic. Over time, we found out that visuals were not that important for poker players, and that players cared much more about speed of play, and the ability to play several hands at once, etc. The pure game of it is much more important to most players, as opposed to avatars, and bells, and whistles, etc.

  door: 2005-07-04 20:54:21

Florida Gator Takes College Poker Tournament

June 09, 2005
Earl Burton
A University of Florida law student became the first champion of Absolute Poker's "Win Your Tuition" freeroll tournament.

The tournament, for all college students, paid off handsomely for its competitors. First prize was full payment of the champion's fall tuition, with a laptop for the runner-up and Apple IPod's for the rest of the final table.

Competing for the first time in an online tournament, 24 year old Derek Dilberian of the University of Florida College of Law was able to conquer the 450 player field to take the title. The New Jersey native is in the top five percent of his class and has been named to the Florida Law Review just this spring. He had been paying his college tuition primarily through a series of college loans and odd jobs. He also is a guitarist and moonlights in a rock band. What time is left, he says, he plays online poker.

Asked what the secret to his success was, Dilberian replied, "I act how strong I am. I don't put on a show." When he was asked further how he defeated the 450 player field, he summed his tournament up in one sentence. "At the beginning, you have to be patient because it all boils down to survival. Then, you analyze your opponent's games."

Garin Gustafson, Vice President of Marketing for Absolute Poker, couldn't be happier about the success of the tournament. "This was an entertaining, no cost way for college students to have fun and compete for a chance to pay for school." He expects the entries for the fall tournament to double the 4,000 players who battled for this semester's championship, adding "We're already registering players for this November. After all, how many opportunities do you get to win tuition through playing free poker games?"

Providence College's Tim Mannion was the second place finisher in the event and will have the use of a new laptop computer come the fall semester, and the other final table finishers walked away with IPod's for their efforts. Expect the battle to rage again in the fall as the Absolute Poker "Win Your Tuition" Tournament warms up again!

Want to host your own private online tournament? Poker Stars make it easy

  door: 2005-07-04 20:54:58

Nightclub owner wins WSOP $2500 6-Handed No Limit Hold'em event

June 09, 2005
Oliver Tse
Issac Galazan
Playing in only his 3rd land-based poker tournament, nightclub owner Issac Galazan won the World Series of Poker (WSOP) $2500 buy-in 6-handed No Limit Hold'em event at the Rio Pavilion Convention Center.

Galazan, who referred to himself as "The General" and "Issac G," outlasted a field of 548 players to collect the first place prize of $315,125 and the coveted gold bracelet.

A native of Miami who now lives in Bangkok, Thailand, Galazan pulled off one of the most shocking upsets in the history of the WSOP when he defeated the 18th place finisher of the 2004 WSOP World Championship main event, Harry Demetriou of London, England, in an heads-up match that lasted only 12 hands.

Demetriou, who started the heads-up match with about a 5-to-3 chip advantage, lost most of his chips to Galazan on Hand 90, the 10th hand of heads-up play.

With blinds at 3000-6000, Demetriou called from the button and Galazan checked. On a flop of 2h 6c 5s, Galazan continued his pattern of overbetting the pot all afternoon and evening by betting 30000. Demetriou raised to 90000 and Galazan quickly moved all-in.

Demetriou called instantly and turned over 6d 4s for one pair of sixes with an inside straight draw. Galazan turned over pocket nines, which held up with the Kc came on the turn and the Qh came on the river.

"I think (Demetriou) thought I was bluffing," said Galazan. "I thought maybe I went all-in so fast that maybe he thought I was making a desperate move to win the pot."

"He (Galazan) could have had anything," said Demetriou regarding his call. "I obviously felt I was in front. Even if I were behind, I had 9 outs. I took the chance to try to win (the tournament) right there...Perhaps I should have played small pots and tried to ground him down."

Demetriou was eliminated on Hand 92 when he moved his remaining 150000 chips all-in with Qc 9s and was quickly called by Galazan who turned over Kh Js. The board of 4d 5d 8d 5s 2h were no help for Demetriou, who had to settle for the runner-up prize of $163,850.

Professional gambler Tommy Grimes of Houston Texas was eliminated by Galazan on Hand 80. On a flop of Qd Jd 7h, Galazan bet 20000, Grimes raised to 75000, Galazan re-raised all-in, and Grimes called. Galazan turned over Qs 9s for top pair while Grimes turned over Jc 8s for middle pair. Grimes got no help with the Ks on the turn and 3d on the river to finish in 3rd place for a prize of $85,075.

David Singer of Mamaroneck, New York was eliminated by Demetriou in Hand 61. Demetriou opened under the guy for 22000 and Singer called from the small blind. On the flop of As Jc 7h, Singer checked, Demetriou bet 55000, and Singer called. Both players checked the turn card of 5c. Singer went all-in for 186,500 total on the river when the 6d came off. Demetriou thought for over 3 minutes before calling with Ah 4h, which were good enough to win the pot against Singer's pocket Nines.

Antonio "The Magician" Esfandiari, who arrived at the final table as the short stack, busted out 5th place when he lost a "race situation" against Demetriou. With blinds at 2000-4000, Demetriou opened for 15000, Esfandiari re-raised to 59000, Demetriou announced all-in, and Esfandiari called. Esfandiari's Kd Jc missed against Demetriou's pocket Eights on a board of 4h 3d Qc 6c 4s. Esfandiari earned $63,020 for his 5th place finish.

David Barnes of London, England was the first casualty of the final table on Hand 3. Barnes opened for 16000, Demetriou called, Galazan re-raised to 50000, Barnes moved all-in, and Galazan called. Barnes Ah Jh failed to connect against Galazan's pocket Tens on a board of 3h 4s 7h 9c Ks.

2005 WSOP Event 6 $2500 Buy-in 6-Handed No Limit Hold'em Final Table Results

Place Player Hometown Prize
1 Issac Galazan Bangkok, Thailand $315,125
2 Harry Demetriou London, England $163,850
3 Tommy Grimes Houston, Texas $85,705
4 David Singer Marmaroneck, New York $75,625
5 Antonio Esfandiari San Francisco, California $63,020
6 David Barnes London, England $50,415

  door: 2005-07-04 20:57:26

The Poker Counselor's Corner (11)

June 10, 2005
John “Poker Counselor” Carlisle, MA, NCC
Editor's Note: In addition to being a poker enthusiast, gambling columnist, and lecturer, John is a National Certified Counselor (NCC) and practices in his home state of Pennsylvania. He has a Master of Arts degree in Counseling from West Virginia University, and a Bachelor's degree in Psychology with a minor in Sociology from Lock Haven University. You can arrange for interviews, speaking engagements, or ask your question to "the Poker Counselor" at carlisle14@hotmail.com.

I have been playing online poker seriously for two years now. Last year I made about $15k and this year I am on track to pass that figure. Well, I was on track. The last three weeks have been appalling. Whenever I play on PS or UB I have my money in 90% with the best hand. I have been losing so frequently and to utter rubbish that my belief in my winning is shot. It is unreal how I can get beat day after day by under pairs, runner-runner flushes and gut shot straights. My pocket pairs always get cracked by the Ax and my AKs get cracked by the pocket pair.

I guess it is time to stop playing for a while but logic tells me that I would want my money all in any time against the type of player I'm encountering. Do I stop playing and wait for a 'change of luck' or do I soldier on? I am not of the camp that believes online poker is rigged but some days I can well see how people think it is. How long should I take a break for or should I just keep my blood boiling on this losing streak? - Submitted by Redhead through Pokernews.com



Players often mistakenly assume that tilt is a temporary phenomenon. We think that a bad beat will cause us to play recklessly for the next few hands due to the anger over the poor fortunes. After a few hands, we suppose that the emotions will dissipate to allow for more focused play to re- emerge. I label this temporary tilt as "minor tilt," as it is indeed a short-lived negative emotional reaction. What you are experiencing is a full blown case of "major tilt." Your emotional whirlwind has become so encompassing that you question everything: your ability, your motivations, and poker itself. While this major tilt takes hold of your poker life, it creeps into all aspects of your life and feels like a heavy weight to bear. It is within this more severe emotional state that poker players are most personally challenged. In short, these are the kinds of times that ruin would-be formidable poker players.

Overcoming major tilt is no easy proposition. Battling any severe emotional reaction is best accomplished through cognitive restructuring (adjusting the thinking that drives the emotions). Even as a professional Counselor, I am battling emotions that I know I should be able to out-think. After a nasty car accident which caused me to be taken by ambulance to the hospital, I now find it continually uncomfortable to drive past the location of the accident. Although I can label and understand the post traumatic symptomology, and I know quite well how to cognitively restructure, it is still a tough exercise. Your continual bad beats hold some similarities to my car wreck. In some ways, the continual unexpected disappointments at the table have combined to produce traumatic symptoms. You allude to your efforts to mentally work through your sticking points when you mention your "logic" leading you to re-think the situation. You are on the right track, but you have a very long way to go.

I am not a big advocate for avoiding play while tilting. I find that unaddressed emotionality will only boil just beneath the surface, and will quickly resurface when the next bad beat arises. In other words, if you just walk away from the game for a week or two to calm down, you are very susceptible to break down at the next sign of bad luck. Instead of avoiding tilt, I encourage players to endeavor to overcome it. Great players always seem to find a way to do so, and you can as well as you work towards greatness. Face the demons and beat them. Drop down a level or two to find a comfortable buy-in with a comfortable structure. Be sure not to set yourself up for failure - do not EXPECT to take a series of bad beats. The anticipation can only amplify the effects, if it happens. Instead, relish each hand that you happen to win. Pat yourself on the back for each tough lay-down that you are able to muster. In essence, you are attempting to gather your confidence while re-establishing your trust in the game. Your track record (with 15 thousand in profits) displays that you have the makings of a great player. Prove it to yourself by overcoming these dark days of bad beats and bad runs.

I read that online players who call a raise very quickly are usually on a draw. So, I re-raised the guy and ran right into a monster hand. I got busted out of the tournament because I thought I had picked-up an online tell. -Posted at a chat forum by Ashby.

Oops. Chalk it up to experience, Ashby. Remember, live and online tells are not 100% accurate. Instead, they are simply one piece of the puzzle of information to take into account when making a decision. You have to remember that many players are reading the same books of tells and instructional articles that you are. Thus, many out there are intentionally giving off common "reverse tells." Successful use of misinformation can bring some players steady profits. Never allow a tell alone to drive your actions. Make sure that you take your time to evaluate everything that has lead up to that moment of action to make the wisest step.

  door: 2005-07-04 20:58:00

Gracz outdraws to win WSOP No Limit Hold'em with Rebuys Event

June 11, 2005
Oliver Tse
Maciek "Michael" Gracz of Raleigh, North Carolina won his second major poker tournament of the year by outlasting a field of 826 players at the World Series of Poker (WSOP) $1000 No Limit Hold'em with Rebuys event at the Rio Pavilion Convention Center.

Gracz won the first prize of $594,460 and the coveted gold bracelet.

In a heads-up battle that lasted 51 hands, Gracz eliminated C. T. Law of Middlesbrough, England, when Gracz outdrew Law on Hand 136.

With blinds at 10000-20000, Gracz opened for 60000 and Law called. On a flop of Jd 5c 8c, Law checked, Gracz bet 70000, Law raised to 180000, Gracz moved all-in and Law called his remaining chips. Law had Qd Jd for top pair while Gracz had Qs 8s for middle pair. Gracz outdrew Law with the 8h on the turn, and Law got no help on the river with the 6c.

Gracz had taken the chip lead from Law on Hand 93. With blinds at 8000-16000, Law opened from the button for 50000 and Gracz called. On a flop of Ac 2d 8s, Gracz checked, Law bet 60000, and Gracz called. Gracz check-called a 130000 bet from Law on the turn card of 3h. When the 4h hit the board on the river, Gracz checked, Law bet 200000, Gracz re-raised to 620000, and Law re-raised all-in holding Ace-Queen offsuit. Gracz called instantly with Ace-Five offsuit which made a "wheel" straight.

Adding to the $1.5 million he won at the World Poker Tour Cruise to Mexico in March, Gracz has earned over $2 million in less than two years in professional poker tournaments.

"I have been very fortunate and very lucky," said Gracz to ESPN commentator Norman Chad.

The 24-year-old Gracz immigrated to the United States from his native Poland when his mother accepted a postdoctoral research fellowship position 16 years ago. Now a professor of Biochemistry, Gracz's mother motivated him to finish his Bachelor's degree in Finance from North Carolina State University.

"I was spending more time playing poker than going to class," said Gracz to Chad. "My mom sort of kicked me in the butt to make me finish school."

Chuck Thompson of Santa Cruz, California was eliminated in 3rd place by Gracz on Hand 84. With blinds at 8000-16000, Thomas opened from the button for 50000, Gracz re-raised all-in from the big blind for over 400000 with pocket Eights, and Thompson called his remaining chips with Ah Jh. Gracz flopped a set with Kc Ad 8h. The Kd on the turn gave Thompson 4 outs with the two remaining Kings and the two remaining Aces, but Thompson missed when the 9d hit the board on the river. Thompson, who works as a host at Bay 101 Casino in San Jose, California, earned $176,145.

2002 CardPlayer Magazine Player-of-the-Year David "The Dragon" Pham was eliminated by Law on Hand 83. With blinds at 6000-12000, Law opened for 37000 and Pham called from the big blind. On a flop of A-Q-8, Pham checked, Law bet 25000, Pham raised to 105000, Law moved all-in, and Pham called. Law flopped a set with pocket Eights while Pham needed to draw running cards to stay alive when he turned over Ac 5c. Pham was drawing dead when the 6d hit the board on the turn and had to settle for a prize of $154,125.

Shane Schleger of New York was eliminated in 5th place by Gracz on Hand 69 when Gracz picked off Schleger's bluff attempt on the turn. With the board showing 8h 7c 3s 7d, Gracz checked, Schleger moved all-in, and Gracz called with Ad Th after thinking for 2 minutes. Schleger could only produce Ks Js and missed when the Tc hit the board on the river. Schleger exited with a prize of $132,110.

University of Chicago graduate Shae Drobushevich was eliminated in 6th place by Law on Hand 60. Drobushevich moved all in for 106000 with Ad 6s and Law called with Ac Qc. Drobushevich needed to draw running cards to stay alive when a Queen flopped, and was drawing completely dead when a Ten hit the board on the turn. Drobushevich collected $110,090.

French poker pro Pascal Perrault was eliminated in 7th place by Law on Hand 55. On a flop of 8d 6d 4d in a 3-way unraised pot, Perrault checked, Law checked, Gracz bet 35000, Perrault moved all-in for 203000, Law called instantly, and Gracz folded. Law turned over Ad 2d for a flush while Perrault could only produce 8h 5c for one pair. The turn card of 3h left Perrault drawing dead. Perrault took home $88,070.

2001 WSOP Main Event 4th-place finisher and 2004 WPT Bay 101 Shooting Stars champion Phil Gordon was eliminated by Pham in 8th place on Hand 16. With blinds at 4000-8000, Pham opened for 28000, Gordon moved all-in for 72000, and Pham called. Gordon's pocket Aces were cracked by Pham's pocket Tens when Pham made a set on the turn with the Ten of Diamonds. Gordon, the co-host of Bravo TV's Celebrity Poker Showdown, departed with $66,055.

Southern California-based poker pro Meng La, who started the final table as the short stack, was eliminated by Law in 9th place on Hand 11. La moved all-in for 41000 with Kc Qs and was called by Law with Ad 8d. La missed the board completely while Law made a full house with the board showing 7s 8c Jd 8h Ah. La took home $44,035.

WSOP Event 7 $1000 No Limit Hold'em with Rebuys Final Table Results

Place Player Hometown Prize
1 Maciek "Michael" Gracz Raleigh, NC $594,460
2 C. T. Law Middlesbrough, UK 311,555
3 Chuck Thompson Santa Cruz, CA 176,145
4 David "The Dragon" Pham Cerritos, CA 154,125
5 Shane Schleger New York, NY 132,110
6 Shae Drobushevich Moline, IL 110,090
7 Pascal Perrault Paris, France 88,070
8 Phil Gordon Las Vegas, NV 66,055
9 Meng La Torrance, CA 44,035

  door: 2005-07-04 20:58:39

Poker on TV: Interview with the CEO of The Poker Channel

June 12, 2005
Tony Bromham
Our correspondent recently had the pleasure of visiting the London headquarters of The Poker Channel to talk with Crispin Nieboer, the Chief Executive Officer, about this exciting TV development for poker enthusiasts.

The Poker Channel was launched in the United Kingdom on 23rd March 2005 and is the world's first TV channel dedicated to poker. The Poker Channel is available to all Sky TV subscribers in the UK, as a free to air channel, and is located under the Entertainment section Channel Number 265.



PN: Well, Crispin, first of all I would like to thank you for taking the time out to have a chat about The Poker Channel.

CN: Not at all. It's my pleasure.

PN: I guess it is best to start at the beginning. What events led to the birth of the Poker Channel and your becoming the Chief Executive?

CN: The idea of The Poker Channel actually came to me when I was in the bath! In my previous line of work, my job entailed coming up with ideas for TV channels when I was at Sky TV and, before that, Granada TV.

What interested me about The Poker Channel in particular was I couldn't help but look at the United States and see the incredible success that people like Party Poker and Pokerstars had achieved from sponsoring poker tournaments - like the World Poker Tour televised on the Travel Channel - and see the complete proliferation of poker programming, and sponsored programming, onto networks like ESPN.

I knew it would only be a matter of time until programmes like Poker Million, which already rate incredibly well, and programmes like Late Night Poker on Channel 4 would follow the same process and become much more mass market. So, for me, that's how the idea of The Poker Channel was born.

PN: I imagine the lead up to the official TV launch on 23rd March was both a tense and exciting time for everyone involved.

CN: Yes, it definitely was both tense and exciting! Tense because, when you launch a channel on the Sky platform in the UK, they tend to give you your launch date only a couple of months before you are required to launch and, if you miss your launch date, you don't get one for another 6 or 9 months depending on the time of year.

We were given our launch date in late December (2004) and the launch date was March 7th. Given that it was Christmas and everything else in between, we had a lot to do but we got there and we are very proud that we did it. It was very exciting and it's great to be doing something that is a world first - the world's first dedicated poker channel. We've put together a great team and we've got some great programmes.

PN: Soon after the launch of The Poker Channel, viewers were told about the British Poker Open (BPO) and how this would be the very first time anywhere in the world where a major tournament would be screened predominantly live during its early stages. I assume the idea was to ensure that The Poker Channel would quickly establish a wide audience amongst poker fans?

CN: Yes, the thinking behind the British Poker Open was to create a format that really took poker to the next level in terms of how it is televised. People had previously done live finals, for example, the Poker Million did a live final and did that very well. Shooting more than just a final, shooting the heats live as well, was something that I thought a lot of people felt should be done. It was just a question of how to achieve it.

Shooting poker live is, as I am sure you know, very difficult. You have to get round the table quickly to pass a huge amount of information to the viewer in real time and there can be a lot of dull hands. So to make that as exciting and spontaneous but also informative and to get all the data across in a way that the viewers want was a challenge we thought was there to be taken on.

That was the thinking behind the BPO. It was to prove that live poker could be done effectively and well. Also the other thing we wanted to do with the BPO was to have some of the biggest international and US players come to the UK. I think a lot of British tournaments to date haven't really done that effectively. So, we were very pleased to have the likes of Howard Lederer, Gus Hansen, Jesus Ferguson and Greg Raymer come over and play in it and I think that proved that, after a point, we started to be taken very seriously.

PN: The heats of the BPO were each sponsored by major on-line poker companies such as PartyPoker, Pokerstars, Full Tilt and Betfair who in return sent a mixture of their own on-line qualifiers and sponsored professional players to the tournament. What feedback have you since had from these sponsors and are they likely to repeat the process in future?

CN: We've had positive feedback although it's early days. We will repeat each programme a certain number of times. Some channels repeat as many as ten times but we won't do as many as that. The short answer is, the poker sites have been very pleased with what's happened but they haven't been given a chance yet to be able to see what the performance of the shows has been like. Obviously, for them, they want to get as many eyeballs as possible across their brands when they sponsor something.

Also, we haven't had the chance yet to go out and close deals internationally and we are also talking to terrestrial TV channels. In six months' time, they will be able really to analyse the performance of that sponsorship and how it has done for them. What I would say is that it is very early days for our channel. Things are looking good - we got 0.8 million viewers in our first real month of broadcast and some of the shows, the Party Poker shows for instance, have attracted 500,000 unique viewers cumulatively over the broadcast and the Pokerstars shows, on one airing, have already attracted over 250,000. So they are attracting a hell of a lot of eyeballs which is, in the end, what they want.

PN: A number of top US-based professionals like Lederer, Ferguson, Block, Raymer and Hansen all competed in the BPO. Do you know if they enjoyed the experience of playing in a London TV studio?

CN: Yes, they did. All of them said how much they enjoyed it. In particular, the difference for them was playing live. I think also having a trip to the UK was great. A lot of these guys represent the poker sites and, in the case of Full Tilt, they have a share in the business or run and own it. I think a lot of these guys realise the UK is the new growth area and that the quick and easy growth in the US has already occurred.

We enjoyed having them over and they enjoyed staying. We had Greg Raymer come down (to the studio) most nights and Gus came down two or three nights just to soak up the atmosphere and be in the bar. When we could, we got as many people up into the commentary suite as possible so it went well.

PN: What else does The Poker Channel have lined up in the near future to have us all (in Britain at least) jotting down diary entries?

CN: From 30th May, we have started to broadcast the World Cup of Poker and this is being broadcast every Monday and Wednesday at 10pm. The World Cup of Poker format is sponsored by Pokerstars.com. They've basically created a format which they ran last year, in Barcelona I think, and now they are doing it again this year with us in London. They've taken forty countries and whittled it down to four. We then shot the competition of the four countries playing against each other. There was Norway, Costa Rica, Scotland and Austria.

The reason I was interested in this format is because no-one has really done heads-up in a way that we thought really provided viewers with something that was different, informative, useful and exciting. There has been heads-up broadcast before but I don't think it has been done necessarily that well.

Hopefully what the viewers will see is a way that heads-up poker can be incredibly exciting and it can happen incredibly quickly. Then there are the reads that each player has on each other. It's a very different form of poker. There are nine shows and each show has two matches in it. I think the shows look amazing.

We've then got the World Series of Poker (WSOP) coverage in late June and July. We have a crew over there to follow it and will have weekly updates on the channel. Poker fans in the UK and elsewhere will want to know what is happening as it is happening rather than wait for the edited ESPN version to come out several months later. We are all about giving our viewers what they want when they want it.

We are providing live feeds from partner websites on the channel so viewers can, if they want, go onto a website like Pokerheaven.com, and have their play broadcast live on The Poker Channel on a slightly delayed basis (to prevent any cheating) and we will apply commentary over that so they can have their game analysed. Viewers can text in and make comments and we may also do a radio phone-in type show where the commentator is analysing and watching your game and is taking calls.

So those are three things we have coming up on The Poker Channel shortly. We also have a poker school format, a master class format, coming up which will be more for intermediate and advanced players than just for beginners. There is already a lot of beginners' material out there.

PN: In Britain, before The Poker Channel was launched, there was a plethora of satellite/cable channels broadcasting re-runs of US-based poker shows such as the WPT and, dare I mention, Celebrity Poker. In true US-style, these have an in-your-face "entertainment" bias. Do you regard The Poker Channel as providing a more education-based service for both the new and seasoned poker player or is "show-business" also on the agenda?

CN: That's a good question! Our core aim in our first three to six months is to provide something for the more hardcore poker enthusiast but, going forward, we want to ensure that we can offer something also for a more casual interest in poker and, with regards to that, a more entertainment-focussed rather than just professional tournament player.

So we are looking at, for August and September, shooting one or two entertainment-oriented shows. That may be in one of two forms. Either a celebrity format which we will shoot in August/September or December - we'll certainly do one this year - or a kind of "Poker Idol" format, but not using the "Idol" trademark; rather that is just to give you an idea of the format. That may be called something like World Poker Champion 2005.

That format is again more entertainment-oriented where viewers have the chance to affect the show by voting for players they like or dislike, and where you take a "Joe Public" internet playing amateur and give them a chance to become a fully paid-up sponsored professional, to be sent off to all the tournaments around the world and the live the dream.

That type of tournament along with the celebrity tournament I think is going to be a more wide-reaching format. We wanted to make sure that, if we are going to call ourselves The Poker Channel, we are going to go out to be the core home of poker when it comes to televised poker in the UK. We wanted to be absolutely sure, through tournaments such as the BPO, we were in the bullseye of providing a professional service to hard-core poker enthusiasts and not something that's "Mickey Mouse". But, yes, we will do more entertainment stuff as we go forward.

PN: Moving away from The Poker Channel specifically, what is your vision of the future of TV programming of poker and do you see this embracing live on-line gaming attracting players away from their computers?

CN: I think going forward there will undoubtedly be some more copycat channels that come out replicating what The Poker Channel has started. I don't mind that; imitation is the best form of flattery sometimes and I think it is a big market. So, I think we'll see three or four channels coming out like that in the next 18 months. I'm not sure whether we'll see many that are independent. For example, Pokerzone's launch is associated with a major poker site.

Outside of that, what I see happening is people have talked a lot about interactive TV and the scope for betting on there; the Gaming Act de-regulation has gone through now and at the end of 2006 we'll be able to have casino-based gaming on interactive TV. That's obviously a key opportunity for us and something we've been focussed on from the start, but we shouldn't over-estimate how big interactive TV is compared to the internet. It will always be a tiny percentage of it.

What is useful from a channel perspective is it gives the viewers something else to do while he is watching the channel. It creates greater periods of viewing on the channel and gets the viewer to stay with us longer. From that aspect it is interesting but it is never going to be a huge money-spinner and that wouldn't be the reason we'd do it. It is more of a kind of marketing service for us to give our viewers something else to do on the channel.

In terms of switching, I think the most exciting thing from directly linking the web to the TV is in relation to web-feed programming that we are launching this month on our channel. We are providing, on a slightly delayed basis, coverage of big tournament games happening right now on certain sites so that players from these sites can get themselves known in the market more and we can analyse their play and look at how they are operating. That I think will be, in the near term, the most interesting link between the two platforms.

PN: Turning to you personally, do you find time in your busy schedule to play poker yourself?

CN: We have a game every Friday as a team, when we have time. James Hopkins, our producer, who organises the games, and Chiara Cipriani, our Director of Television, are both very good whereas I am a terrible poker player! I always get beaten by them because I don't have the patience. It's a game that I really enjoy and I guess about once a month I play on my own on-line but I wouldn't like to pretend I am a big winner. James is your man, James is good!

PN: Finally, is there anything else we haven't covered here today that you would like the readers of Poker News to know about?

CN: All I would say is that we are re-launching our channel website (pokerchannel.co.uk). So, for those people who cannot view the Poker Channel yet, you will, by the time this article comes out, be able to view short videos of key programmes, and a whole host of additional content and exclusive information. We've got a huge editorial section on the WSOP, and a team of leading reporters with articles from leading journalist Rolf Slotboom, the voice of poker Jesse May, Dave 'El Blondie' Colclough, and Gary 'The Choirboy' Jones. There's also a new web forum, an SMS poker tips service, results of the key tournaments, and transcripts of all our interviews. So, if you can't watch "Up Close with Greg Raymer" for instance we've got the transcript of the interview on the website. The web-site also allows you to watch edited video footage of our major tournaments, including the moment Greg Raymer took out 2 players at once in the British Poker Open, with a Queen-Eight, versus an Ace-King and pair of Queens. I'll let you see for yourself what happens.

  door: 2005-07-05 15:50:36

The REAL championship at the World Series of Poker

June 13, 2005
John Caldwell
One, two, three
If you have ever been to any poker tournaments, or any convention type things like BARGE, you know the real championship that matters isn't the main No Limit Hold Em event. The championship that people will talk about for decades is the Roshambo Championship. You say you don't know what Roshambo is? Sure you do. Chances are you have played it a hundred times. The more common name for Roshambo is Rock, Paper, Scissors. In some areas, its actually called Paper, Scissors, Rock.

At many poker events, the Roshambo event (unofficial of course) is a nice break from the pressure of the 'real' poker events, and a chance for everyone to let their hair down, and relax.

This event was shot by ESPN, and one would assume that this will air as one of their "Nuts" segments that occur during their WSOP telecasts. The very brief event was held on the main stage immediately preceding the Pot Limit Hold Em Final table (Event #9).

TV's Phil Gordon was the host for the brief event (and Phil needed it to be brief, as he was actually playing in the Pot Limit event - Event # 11). A field of 64 players ponied up $200 each, with $5,000 of the proceeds going to a cancer charity. The winner of this event was actually freerolled into the main event of this years WSOP.

The 64 played down to four last night, and the final four of Roshambo were:

Rafe Furst
Annie Duke
Robert Boyd
Kevin Keller

Each semi-final was a best of seven race, and the competitors were psyched, and ready to go. The first semi-final pitted Robert Boyd against Fill Tilter Rafe Furst. It was a game match , but at the end of the day Robert Boyd was just too much. On "hand" 6, Robert rocked, and Rafe scissored, and that was that. Robert took the match 4 to 2, and was into the finals.

The next match had Annie Duke versus Kevin Keller. Annie had a very special system where she would look at the serial number of a dollar bill, and determine her action from that. Unfortunately for Annie, she took the wrong dollar bill out, and Kevin beat her 4-2 when his Paper wrapped Annie's rock up.

So, the final was set, and the crowd was buzzing. Oddly enough, there was a bigger crowd for this event than there were for about half the final tables thus far.

Kevin Keller shot out to a 3-1 lead, and it looked like Thunder's brother was going to bring the thunder all over Robert Boyd. But, Boyd came rocketing back (with friends Dutch Boyd, and Scott Fischman sweating him), and tied things up at 3 all.

Appropriately, the World Series of Roshambo came down to the last "hand". Robert Boyd scissored, and Kevin papered, and the comeback was complete. Robert Boyd is your 2005 Roshambo champion. Congratulations Robert, they will be talking about this win for decades....or at least minutes.


  door: 2005-07-05 15:51:21

Phil Gordon To Host Charity Poker Event

July 06, 2005
Earl Burton
One of the things that poker has attempted to do during its current popularity is to use the game to raise funds for charitable causes. Phil Hellmuth has attempted to do that with some of his charity work and Clonie Gowen has also lent her name and presence to promote fundraising for United Cerebral Palsy. Of course, it is legend in the tournament poker world that the monies that Barry Greenstein makes from tournament play are all donated to charity, including his favorite, Children, Inc.

Phil Gordon is another that has used his poker playing prowess to raise money for cancer research. In fact, Gordon is on the Board of Directors for the Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation. Poker players and many others have pledged to give one percent of their tournament winnings to this organization through Phil's "Put A Bad Beat On Cancer". It is a fundraising drive that has the support of Team Full Tilt (of which Phil is a part of) and many other professionals throughout the rest of their careers, not just through this World Series of Poker.

Gordon is now stepping over to the East Coast to help poker give back to several charitable organizations. Next Shift Enterprises, LLC, a multi-venture business owned and operated by current and former professional hockey players, has announced that Phil will be the "poker host" for their "Pucks, Putters and Poker" festivities being held at Foxwoods Resort Casino in Connecticut.

"Pucks, Putters and Poker" will be a weeklong series of charitable events held from July 25-31. It will bring together the greatest names from the sporting world, celebrities and poker professionals to meet and compete against business people, casual fans and poker aficionados. The gathering will definitely be fun, competitive, exciting and, above all else, philanthropic.

Four charities will benefit from the events at Foxwoods. The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, the Carson Kolzig Foundation (named for Washington Capitals goaltender Olaf Kolzig's son, Carson, who has autism), the Garth Brooks Teammates for Kids Foundation and the Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation will be the recipients of the funds raised during this extraordinary week of philanthropy.

"Phil has shown he will go the extra mile to raise funds and awareness for cancer research, both at the poker tables and away from them," remarked Pete LeBoutillier, the business director of Next Shift, LLC. "He also is a star on the professional poker circuit. It seemed that he was an ideal fit for "Pucks, Putters and Poker" and we all look forward to his expertise at Foxwoods."

"I'm thrilled to be part of the event," Phil responded. "I look forward to making this event as big a success as it can be!"

Phil will host a sixty minute poker seminar for participants at Foxwoods and serve as the emcee for the poker tournaments that are featured during the week. Over $70,000 in prizes will be up for grabs there, including a seat at the World Poker Tour's stop at Foxwoods later this year. Additionally, Gordon has donated a two hour private lesson and five copies of his recently released DVD "Final Table Poker with Phil Gordon" to the charity auction that will be a part of "Pucks, Putters and Poker."

For those that are looking for something once the poker portion is done, there will be a six day hockey fantasy camp, an exhibition game featuring current and former National Hockey League stars, a celebrity golf tournament and other special events. In all, it will make the last week of July the event of a lifetime!

To learn more about Next Shift, LLC or about "Pucks, Putters and Poker", be sure to check out their website at nextshiftllc.com or contact Pete LeBoutillier at (410) 740-8748.

  door: 2005-07-07 07:02:50

Poker Star: Interview with Isabelle Mercier

July 08, 2005
Samantha Delmas
Isabelle Mercier
In poker, women have already proved that they could easily challenge men, however, poker stays as a majority a male's world and only few women have been internationally recognized yet. One of them is a charismatic and charming girl who has already drawn attention to herself because of her talent and some impressive results. As a matter of fact, a lot of people know Isabelle Mercier since she won the "Ladies Night Out II" World Poker Tour tournament, which took place last year in Los Angeles. Despite a fully booked schedule, she was really kind enough to answer our questions:


PN: Where are you now?

My « home » at the moment is the Rio Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas where I am staying for six weeks in order to play in a number of poker tournaments at the WSOP. I am proud to be the roving Ambassador of PokerStars.com and have the opportunity to participate in so many international poker festivals.

PN: How do you feel during these WSOP?

I am doing my best to go grab a bracelet, but I have to admit the fields of players are enormous so it is very challenging. I have four days off at the moment before my next tournament so I will use that time to study my game and work on it. I have cashed-in in two events so far, but most importantly, making it "deep" into those tournaments gave me the opportunity to play with some GREAT poker players. Plenty more to come, so it obligates me to push my own limits further, if I want to do much better in the next events.

PN: During these huge poker tournaments, you have to stay seated for hours, sometimes days, what do you usually do to relax? Do you have a special way to prepare yourself?


It takes me quite a while to get ready for a tournament, I would say about two hours. By the time I wake up, get out of bed, drink a juice, have coffee, take a bath with candles (yes, I do that in the morning!), do the hair, the make-up, and get dressed, have a quick look at my emails, get down at Starbucks and start to walk the mile between my room and the poker room located at the extreme extremity of Rio's convention centre hallway, two hours have evaporated. I listen to loud music in my earphones on my way to the tournament, I find it helps stimulating my preparation to play. It takes quite a drive to go sit down in a tournament and fight for hours to build your way up to victory.
At night, I find it constructive to talk about my play of the day with other poker players, discussing hands and strategies, and so many other elements you can analyse in poker. I think it's a rather important part of the learning process

PN: How did you get to the point to leave a very comfortable position and devote yourself to poker only?

I had a wonderful job as the manager of the poker room in the ACF in Paris, but after five years, it was time to move on to the next step, and this was playing poker professionally. As soon the game exploded on TV and it became possible to be a professional player with sponsorship, poker was a natural for me. I have played all my life and the game has been my passion forever. So, I quit the ACF management and organised an open-door sales weekend, during which I sold everything I owned. Since that day, I have been living out of my suitcase and travelling the world. There is not one person who did not tell me that I was a complete idiot when I made my mind and decided to live my new poker life with my big bankroll of $10,000. LOL! Oh well, I guess I'm a big believer in myself and in my dreams. With reasons. It was not the first time I made that kind of drastic changes in my life. Indeed, in my previous-previous life, I have been a lawyer for the biggest portfolio manager in North America. I had a wonderful career starting and a great office in downtown Montreal. But what the hell, what I really wanted was to travel the world, and the law firm would only give me 2-3 weeks off per year. Again, at the time, I did not own much, so I sold my car, paid my debts, and moved to Paris with about $50 in my pocket. It's when I turn around and look back at myself that I realize what I have become and how much I have learned.

PN: Barbara Enright said: "Women may have a basic advantage over their male counterparts. Psychologists tell us that women possess a sixth sense, and this instinctiveness can be a valuable asset at the poker table." Do you really believe that being a woman could be a strong advantage at a poker table?

I tend to agree with Barbara's quote and I think indeed, having a fine instinct appears to be one major feminine attribute. Not only that, it is also a big quality for a poker player. After knowing the math, reading people is a considerable part of the game, and knowing the math comes to anybody who works on it. Reading your opponents is a harder skill to develop, and it does make a big difference when you possess this weapon within your game. It seems women in general have the delicacy of feeling for others, and therefore, have a greater ability to see through them at the table. As long as they don't let the men intimidate them!

PN:You took part into many televised poker events, recently at the British Poker Open televised by the English Channel ..., how do you feel to play in front of camera?

Playing « live » was a tremendous experience, I really loved it and would do it again anytime! First of all, I love to play on TV with the hole card cameras, in fact, it's the best part of my job. The featured tables usually have a crazy energy coming from all the players at the table, and it's very energizing! Second of all, knowing that the cameras are actually filming your hole cards is a surprising stimulus. You can find yourself doing things you didn't know you were able to do! And third, playing "live" was even more interesting than all the other televised tables I played at, simply because in this one, the spectator is allowed to see every single card you are dealt and how you decide to play a hand, or not to play a hand. Because of that, I think those live televised tables will highly contribute to elevate the level of the game.

PN: Some poker hands are unforgettable. In your opinion what is your best victory? Your worst bad beat?

The victory that is the closest to my heart is my win at the World Poker Tour Ladies Night Out II, last September in Los Angeles. It is my first major title, and it's a tournament in which I played soooooo aggressively, that the legendary commentator Mike Sexton automatically nick-named me Isabelle "No Mercy" Mercier. Moreover, this is the performance that actually started my life as a tournament player and representative of PokerStars.com.

As for my worst bad beat, it's the first one I had that is the closest to my souvenir. LOL! It was at the WSOP 2004 and I was playing a single table satellite for the main event. I did not have my ticket yet, and this was the very last night before the event. I played my best game ever and got heads-up with another guy. I battle for my life, and finally flopped a set with my pocket 4s. The flop was K64, and my opponent had AK. Our stacks were about equal, and all the money went in on the flop. Yes! I was so happy to get to play in the WSOP Championship!!!!!..... Until the turn brought a 6, and the river brought another deadly 6. This one hurt so much at the time, partly because it was my first real tournament bad beat, and partly because I did not know better. I was depressed for an entire week, ruining my life and the life of others around me. Overall, it was a good lesson and today I stay happy if I bust out of a tournament on a bad beat. As long as I play good, the rest is not up to me and I cannot get mad about something I have no control over.

PN: What kind of players are you afraid of at a poker table?

I believe you should fear no one if you want to succeed in this game. Only you can really scare yourself out, and in that sense, it is true to say that you and your own fears are your worst enemy in poker. However, I must admit that sometimes you face a player who seem to play perfectly and super strongly every hand ! It becomes hard to defend yourself, he's putting pressure consistently, and he's clearly the chief of the table. Those situations are very uncomfortable, and the souvenir you keep from such a player is often one you will fear in the future. This situation happened to me in the WPT $25 000 at Bellagio last April with David "The Dragon" Pham. So last week, when he arrived and sat directly on my right in one of the WSOP events, I felt baaad. But hey, poker is a very challenging game and that's why it's so fun and difficult. Happily for me, I succeeded in overcoming my fear and I played my A-game against Pham in the WSOP event.

PN: Life of a professional poker player is not easy, what are the advantages and the inconvenients for it?


Personally, I see only upsides of playing poker professionally on the international circuit. I am COMPLETELY free to do whatever I want, whenever I want, wherever I want. I travel the world and possess no such thing as an apartment, a car, bills, etc. I feel my mind is free. I don't have a watch, I go to bed when I'm tired, I wake up when my eyes open, I eat when I'm hungry, I call room-service if I'm too lazy, press the bell-man button if I have laundry to send, somebody cleans my room every day, brings new sheets and towels, wash my bath, etc. All in all, it does it for me. I see no downsides of playing poker as a living. But everybody is different, and I am sure this insecure and itinerant life would not suit at all many people!

PN: What are your projects for the few next months?

Those days, I am working hard on my new website isabellemercier.com that should be online within the next days. As soon as this is over, I feel I will find again a little free time and freedom for myself! I am taking a Trans-Atlantic cruise returning to Europe after the WSOP in order to play in the WPT in Paris, and this will be my last tournament before fall. I am taking August for vacation, and will spend the first third of the month on a ship in the Caribbean with my best girl friends. We've known each other for 20 years, and we are all turning 30 this summer. This cruise is our celebration and I feel like it's a movie, this can't be happening for real!!! Woohoo! After that, I'll spend some time in Quebec, and will return to Los Angeles at the end of August to defend my title as WPT Ladies Champ.

You are playing mostly tournaments, but what about cash games? Are you playing a lot online?

I am indeed a tournament player more than a cash game player. I enjoyed the action and the aggressiveness I find in tournaments, as opposed to cash games, where you have to be more patient and disciplined. I like the competition, so tournaments suit my game very well. The chips have no value, everybody is financially equal, there's a beginning, an end, and a winner! But tournaments are very challenging and you have to put in hours and days and weeks and years of experience to become real good. So I try to play as often as I can, ideally one tournament a day. When it's not live, I like to train on PokerStars.com. It's my online poker home, and PokerStars.com is the Number One site for online tournaments. I like the fact that I can connect at any time and start a tournament within the next 15 minutes in which a thousand players compete! This is incredibly good value!

  door: 2005-07-08 18:24:17

Live Poker Coming To Fox Sports Network

July 10, 2005
Earl Burton
The team at Full Tilt has been making this year's World Series of Poker their own personal playground. Allen Cunningham, Phil Ivey and Erik Seidel have all captured bracelets and Chris "Jesus" Ferguson and Jennifer Harman have played excellently, making a few final tables for each of them. As we begin to hit the homestretch, Team Full Tilt will attack something rarely seen on American television.

On July 13th, the FullTiltPoker.net Championship at the Wynn (the match will be held at the nightclub La Bete in the Wynn) will be broadcast live (meaning it should start around 9PM on the East Coast) on Fox Sports Network. It will be rerun later the same evening, and FSN should be able to get several broadcasts out of it. Up for grabs will be $500,000 in cash among those scheduled to play.

And what a lineup it will be! I know I have always wondered what would be the outcome of a sit and go among the powers of Full Tilt, and now we should see. Scheduled to play in the game are Ferguson, Ivey, Seidel, Harman, John Juanda, WPT Ladies' Night Champion Clonie Gowen, "Celebrity Poker Showdown" host Phil Gordon (having a good Series in his own right), and Andy Bloch. Seeing how they are coming onto his ground, joining the Full Tilt party will be the poker ambassador of the Wynn, 2004 Player of the Year Daniel Negreanu. Serving as the play by play man will be veteran announcer Barry Tompkins with the color provided by Full Tilter Howard Lederer.

While the tournament action should be fast paced and exciting, viewers will be able to see the effects that tournament play has on a player. Each one at the table will wear heart monitors, demonstrating the effects of high stakes play on each of the combatants.

Fox Sports Network was the first (and still the only) network to ever take on the challenge of broadcasting live tournament poker. FSN broadcast the American Poker Championship just last year, and viewers should be able to see that tournament poker is actually a drawn out process, rather than the two hour events that are seen on other broadcasts of tournament poker.

Of course, the lineup is subject to change (do you honestly think that one of the players would walk away from the Main Event if they were still in it?), but it still should be an exciting evening of poker. Mark the calendars, program your TiVo's, and prepare for only the second live poker event telecast in the United States, the FullTiltPoker.net Championship at the Wynn!

  door: 2005-07-11 13:04:23

World Series of Poker - Day One, part two

July 09, 2005
John Caldwell
Day One B of the World Series of Poker Main Event brought much of the same to the Rio as day one A had.

There were a few more celebs playing, including Oliver Hudson (son of Kurt & Goldie) who busted out about 6 hands in, and Tobey Mcguire who did not make it out of his day one either. Mimi Rogers lasted well into the night, but now has her day free Sunday.

The real story, however was how few of the pros that started this day one made their way through the field, and survived into the second day. This was a bloodbath day for most top pros, and all the 'the fields are too big for the pros to work their way through' comments started being heard again, as dozens of top players could not make their way out of day 1B.

This day played even faster than day one A, with only 595 players making it out of this field, and getting into day two, as opposed to the 650 that made it out of day one A.

Daniel Negreanu was one of the more notable first day exits, as he was at the television table for a couple hours, but he arrived short stacked, and left empty handed not long after that.

Some of the other notables who won't be winning the WSOP this year, and were eliminated today included Kathy Liebert, Phil Gordon, Phil Hellmuth (who had a good sized stack for most of the day), Erick Lindgren, Max Pescatori, Men the Master, Evelyn Ng, Allen Cunningham, Cyndy Violette, David Williams, Annie Duke, Miami John, John Hennigan, and many more bit the dust in day one.

Two recent past champions played today, and Chris Moneymaker survived his day one, although he will need help, as he only has about 7,000 chips at this point. 2002 champ Robert Varkoni lost the 'hubby wife' last longer bet, as he was eliminated, but his wife Olga is actually in the top 20 chip leaders for the end of day 1 B.

The chip leader at the end of day one B is a guy from Norway I haven't heard of. But the guy second in chips Sammy Farha, who spent most of the first day at the TV table. The day truly did play faster, as you notice from the fact that today's chip leader (and Farha) will enter day two with more chips than day one A chip leader Lee Watkinson. Here is a list of the top ten chip leaders from Day one B, and a list of some of the notables who managed to survive day one B.

Haakon Waerstad $169,200
Sam Farha $156,600
Graeme Harrison $142,700
Jeffrey Dziedzic $136,450
Brad Kondracki $131,825
Carmel Petresco $111,900
David Rudling $111,100
Joe Connor $106,975
David "Chino" Rheem $100,175
Scott Lazar $95,825
Olga Varkonyi $80,700
J.C. Tran $68,150
Paul 'X-22' Magriel $64,125
Dutch Boyd $55,550
Young Phan $51,325
Paul Wolfe $48,250
Barry Shulman $46,600
Amir Vahedi $43,975
Michael 'The Grinder' Mizrachi $37,200
Chip Reese $30,200
Joe Beevers $29,800
Adam Schoenfeld $28,875
Steve Day $26,350
Rafe Furst $20,600
Dan Harrington $20,575
Chris Karagolleyan $19,350
Peter Costa $18,650
Mimi Tran $17,700
Allyn Jaffrey Shulman $16,525
David Sklansky $9,850
Chris Moneymaker $7,575

Today should be an interesting day, as we still have yet to see many top players like Doyle Brunson, Phil Ivey, Howard Lederer, and many others try to make their mark on the 2005 WSOP main event. See you tomorrow.

  door: 2005-07-11 15:23:25

World Series of Poker - Main Event - End of Day Two

July 11, 2005
John Caldwell
While still not manageable, the field of 1,864 players that remained as we began day two of the main event of the WSOP did fit into one single room, and for the first time since the event began, we started to see s glimpse of the light at the end of the tunnel.

Indeed, the way the day began, you really wondered if we would make it to Friday, or if we could squeeze this thing into four days. Players were busting out left, right, and center, and for a moment, it appeared we might actually get to the money tonight.

Early casualties included Gus Hansen, who lasted less than 15 minutes, and 2003 World Champ Chris Moneymaker, who made it about an hour further. Other notable bustouts included Dan Harrington, David Sklansky, Barry Shulman, Shannon Elizabeth, Gavin Griffin, Huck Seed, Amir Vahedi, Marcel Luske, PGA golfer Rocco Mediate, Mimi Tran, and a cast of a thousand (really).

For the early part of the day, the room was calm, and as usual the loudest sound you heard was the constant chip chatter. Not the chatter of the players holding the chips, but the sound of the chips being shuffled, riffled, and otherwise handled.

Soon enough, an unfortunate thing began to happen. After a relatively calm day, a couple players started shouting things when they won pots, were dodging draws, doubling up, etc. Of course, the TV crews would flock to these players to film them, and create some 'good TV'. This only resulted in more players doing more dumb stuff. Suddenly, there were players standing on chairs, pounding their chests, and shouting any number of silly things, and all the while the cameras came running.

I would like to make a suggestion for next years WSOP (and all TV tournaments, for that matter). I suggest we enact what I would call the "Johnny Knoxville Rule" for future tournaments. The "Johnny Knoxville Rule" states that any player who acts like a Jackass to get on TV gets a 15 minute penalty - purely at the Tournament Director's discretion.

Back to the poker, though, and I saw as much of it as I could today. I saw a player eliminated by runner runner quads. I saw another player call for all his chips with a hand that couldn't beat the board (his opponent had the nuts). I saw a man wearing a Sesame Street character head. On several occasions, I saw deals being cut with players who had a lot of chips where they came back from a break adorned in tons of gear from an online poker room that they may not have even heard of 30 minutes prior.

All in all, we had some great poker today, and I am really looking forward to tomorrow, where I will actually be able to cover the tournament. Trying to keep track of players at 190 tables is officially impossible. But, now we are down to a manageable 569 players (only nine from the money), and somewhere in the neighborhood of 65 tables. The players will play hand for hand play until they get down to the money. Unfortunately, that will take some time. But, after we make the money, players will fly out the door, and it wouldn't surprise me to be somewhere in the 200-250 player mark at the end of today.

There are still some name players in the field, and it appears we may have a new name on our hands. Lots of unknown players at the top of the chip count ladder, and I guarantee each one of them went to bed with dreams of grandeur. There is still a long way to go, however, and any predictions of greatness are extremely premature. Below are the top 20 chip counts (including Greg Raymer making a run at back to back glory, and Olga Varkoni trying to make it two Varkonis in four years), plus notables. See you tomorrow.

Rod Pardey Jr Las Vegas, NV $464,000
James Pollack Charlotte, NC $447,500
Tim Phan Westminster, CA $445,500
Bryan Stellwagen Huntington, NY $377,200
Bob Hotchandani Belize $372,700
Lee Watkinson Cheney, WA $336,800
Jon Lane Osh Kosh, WI $331,800
Russ Salzer New York $326,000
Greg "Fossilman" Raymer Stonington, CT $318,700
Yakov Hirsch Brooklyn, NY $318,100
Hunter Pappas Birmingham, AL $314,300
Klaus Agesen Aarhus $307,000
Kevin Mason Weehawken, NJ $297,400
Michael "The Grinder" Mizrachi Hollywood, FL $294,800
Jim Pittman Yorba Linda $289,200
Graeme Harrison Penicuik, Near Edinburgh $281,500
Daniel Bergsdorf Umea $278,600
Willy-Will' Failla Commack, NY $278,500
Jeffrey Dziedzic Stewartsville, NS $275,400
'Minneapolis' Jim Meehan Palos Verdes, CA $211,900
Olga Varkonyi Great Neck, NY $209,500
Jason Lester Miami, FL $208,700
Layne Flack Las Vegas, NV $188,100
JC Tran Sacramento, CA $178,800
Sam Farha Houston, TX $173,600
Hung La Manhattan Beach, CA $161,600
Kenna James Los Angeles, CA $152,800
Paul L. Darden Jr. Hamden, CT $144,000
John Juanda Marina Del Rey, CA $141,100
Joe 'The Elegance' Beevers Hendon, London $128,800
Howard Lederer Las Vegas, NV $127,800
Mike Matusow Las Vegas, NV $120,100
Jim Feist Las Vegas, NV $108,700
Dutch Boyd Las Vegas, NV $103,800
Carl Olson Seattle, WA $96,900
Phil Ivey Las Vegas, NV $89,600
Gavin Smith Las Vegas, NV $84,900
David Plastik Las Vegas, NV $65,100
Clowie Gowen Dallas, TX $64,400
Kirill Gerasimov Moscow, Russia $63,700
C K Hua Rosemead, CA $58,800
Barbara Enright Los Angeles, CA $44,400
Amir 'Papa' Esfandiary San Jose, CA $38,700
Bob Ciaffone Saginaw, MI $34,600
Young Phan Irvine, CA $17,300

  door: 2005-07-12 09:25:01

Poker Academy Drops Some Knowledge

July 13, 2005
Michael Friedman
When people look to learn the game they have several options. A player can buy a book or a DVD for tutorials, but if they are really committed to learning the game they might consider attending a poker camp like Camp Hellmuth or one of the WPT Boot Camps.

At the camps, players benefit from the personal instruction and their choice of software which helps players understand and improve upon the weaknesses in their game. The two camps have selected Poker Academy software as their training tool.

Poker Academy is one of the leading poker software developers. It has incorporated 10 years of groundbreaking artificial intelligence programming. Its selection by the professional's camps gives the companies credibility in a tough field.

Both camps give the software glowing reviews. "We are very pleased to have Poker Academy on board with Camp Hellmuth and believe that attendees will greatly benefit from the software. After testing many Texas Hold'em software programs, we were convinced that Poker Academy software was the most powerful and practical learning tool on the market," said Camp Hellmuth producer Jeff Goldenberg.

WPT is equally happy with Poker Academy's technology. "Our students will take what they learn in the classroom and then go home and practice using the Poker Academy's Texas Hold'em software. We think Poker Academy will help turn their academic knowledge into practical experience," said WPT president, Ron Reubens.

According to Kurt Lange, president of Poker Academy, everyone can benefit from the software. "Our mission is to help players learn at any level. We feel our software is a great compliment to this endeavor. The artificial intelligence in our software is designed to think like humans, to adapt and improve as the player improves. That's why our training tool will always be fun and challenging to play, and serve as an asset in learning to compete in real-world casinos, tournaments, and online poker rooms."

Poker Academy's software endorsement doesn't stop with the camp either. The company's programs are being used by Lehigh University, one of the United States top learning institutions. Poker Academy recently donated $13,000 worth of software to the university so students could use the technology for computer science and engineering classes and research projects.

According to Hector Munoz-Avila, his students benefit from the use of the program during his "Artificial Intelligence: Game Programming" course. Students in the class study and create algorithms, which are methods of encoding programs that tell computers how to fix problems.

Take heart, if you can't afford to go to a prestigious university or attend a professionally-run camp, you can still get in on the educational action. For a mere $129 dollars a player can download the latest version of the software from Poker Academy's online site, poker-academy.com.

  door: 2005-07-15 14:45:15

Inside the Poker Tour (15) - From the WSOP

July 13, 2005
Dennis Waterman
Dennis
To continue my discussion of how long it is acceptable to wait before acting with the best possible hand I will mention a hand that I was involved in that is bad, but not quite as bad as the one talked about in the previous column. At the 2003 WSOP I was the chip leader in the 5000 buy-in no-limit holdem tournament with about 48 players left with about 55,000 in chips and second place in chips having only about 28,000 when the following hand came up. Now I may not have every detail exactly right but the essential nature of what happened relative to hands, chips, and the positions of players is correct.

We were playing nine handed at 300-600 blinds with an ante of 75. The under the gun player limped from a stack of about 4500, the next player limped from a stack of 11,000, the next player limped from a stack of 23,000, and two more players limped from stacks of about 18,000, the little blind called and I looked down to happily find KK in the big blind. I calculated the pot to have more than 4800 in it and I raised 5000. The raise is one which claims the pot and anyone contesting it will likely have to risk all their chips. It is a reasonable raise but quite large for these blinds and may indicate a wide range of hands as with 55,000 in front of me I can take some risks and represent a big hand without having one.

The first two players pass and I imagine that I am home free, although someone with a hand like AQ suited may call me and get lucky at some point in the hand. In big-bet holdem it is not unusual for one of the first two players to limp in with AA, but the only player I ever saw limp in third with Aces in big-bet was in the eighties when I played a cash game in Reno with a young guy named Phil Hellmuth. I have told the story of this hand many times to illustrate how badly one can play AA and perhaps we will get to it another time... In his defense he was in his early twenties and surely not as arrogant as he later became.

So this player, not famous, but not unknown either, goes into a very long think. Finally someone else at the table calls for the clock. The clock arrives and he raises me 5000 more (leaving himself a little less than 13,000 in chips). I happily move all-in, sure that he has QQ or JJ and then almost fall out of my chair when he turns over AA. It comes 10 high and I lose the hand, and in fact, do not even make the money(!) although I am still well above average after the hand.

This one is more understandable and although not as egregious as the Greenstein-Trumper hand it is still plenty bad enough. At some point bad acting becomes an insult but it is not easy to decide at exactly what point that becomes true.

Okay we will move on to some comments relating to strategy.

KJ suited is a hand that has a lot of value against weak and wild opponents in limit holdem, but is a death trap against tight or good opponents. It amazed me that a recent column in a national publication talked about the various ways that one could lose less with the hand after you began by calling a raise before the flop with the hand against a tough opponent! There is most certainly a way to save those bets—don't play the hand in the first place. This is a hand that will require good judgment after the flop. If you doubt your own ability to determine where you are, or lack the experience to be comfortable making this judgment, do not put yourself in this position. It is simple—you do not have to play the hand! There are three ways to play the hand— 1) behind weakness, rather the player[s] ahead have limped in or raised unbelievably 2) first in with a raise, and 3) as a volume hand (where ideally all the other players take the flop for one bet).

In no-limit holdem the vulnerability of many hands that have value in limit holdem are brought to light. KJ suited is just one of many hands with which you are more likely to lose a big pot than win one. Some of the other hands that play poorly in no-limit are KQ (suited or not), AJ (suited or not), and AQ off-suit behind a raise. There are two reasons for this—1) the potential matchups versus an opponent that shows strength in a pot are usually not favorable, and 2) the odds you receive in a drawing game like limit holdem are usually not there. We will illustrate this further.

The first time you turn over AQ and are against AK, AA, KK, QQ, or even JJ, 10-10, or 9-9 you will feel your hopes reduced to prayers rather quickly. Unless the holdem gods are with you your days are likely numbered. This is even more likely if you hold AJ. Understanding at what stage of the tournament it is acceptable to play such hands is also important as you read about these very same hands at critical moments.

At least with AQ off-suit or AJ suited you are likely to forgive yourself but the first time you turn over KQ off-suit or KJ suited and are against AA, KK, QQ, JJ, AK, or AQ you will feel not only vulnerable, but stupid. This is not a good feeling.

Secondly the math of poker pots gives immediate direction to the correctness of any call, which is obvious when you stop and think about it. As an example, in limit holdem the pot may have 210 in it and when you bet or call 30 more on the flop you are often getting good odds to draw while trying to complete a hand, but in no-limit holdem you might be facing a bet of 210 or more in the same situation, and now getting 2 to 1 instead of 7 to 1 many draws are no longer sensible. Furthermore this extends to the next street so that while you may continue to get proper odds on your initial decision in your limit game it may become way too expensive to continue to draw in the no-limit game. In many situations in no-limit your draw is for only one more card, not for all remaining streets, this quickly changes the true odds for all drawing hands.

Until next time play good...and get lucky!

  door: 2005-07-15 14:46:01

World Series of Poker - Day Three Final Report

July 12, 2005
John Caldwell
At the beginning if the day, 568 players showed up at the Rio with the dream of being a world champion. In addition to their dream, they also knew that eight players would be leaving today with nothing. The tournament had ended the night before missing the money by only eight places, and there were going to be some really nervous people with short stacks sweating out the first hour and a half or so, hoping that their number would not be 561.

The play was painfully slow near the bubble, as play went hand for hand (in hand for hand play - each table must complete their hand before ANY table can start a new hand. This is designed to prevent stalling, and gaining an advantage by playing fewer hands at any given table). We lost three people in the first two hands, so with 65 tables in play, you figured hand for hand play would come to an end fairly quickly. For the next hour and ten minutes, we only lost four more people, and this was a process as slow and plodding as you could possibly imagine.

Finally, we had our bubble boy. Carl Ygborn was busted with about 40 minutes left in the first level of play, and the room erupted in applause. You had to feel sorry for Carl, as he was in the far corner of the room, and had to walk through a room of 560 other players, who were all clapping, shaking hands, and jumping up and down, knowing the worst they could do was $12,500. Carl made his walk with class, and in the middle of his walk was interrupted by Tournament Director Johnny Grooms, who informed him that as a token of appreciation, Carl would be given a free entry into the 2006 WSOP, courtesy of Harrah's. This was a nice gesture for a guy who had to endure a walk that must have felt like the longest walk of his life.

The next two hours were filled with the sounds of dealers yelling "All in, and call" as all the players who had been holding on to make the money threw their remaining chips in at a blistering pace, and we were back to losing two players a minute. Losing two players a minute when you have 200 tables is one thing, but when you are down to 40 tables, and its still happening, it is a sight to see.

This is the new world of internet fed, big bet poker, and its no wonder that the players who want to play small pots are getting forced into making decisions they don't want to make. Players are moving in preflop with 25 big blinds in their stack, over betting pots, and playing the kind of poker seen more and more these days.

Apparently, one player who is very well suited to play in this environment is Greg Raymer. The defending champ is our chip leader. Before you start thinking back to back, consider this. There are still three full days of poker to be played, and I think even Greg is probably still trying to fight those thoughts. Just for fun, I will say this now. If Greg Raymer repeats, it will be the greatest accomplishment in the history of the game, times five.

We started this day with 568 players, and seven went home miserable. We ended this day with 185 players, and all of them are guaranteed at least $39,075. Notable players that bit the dust today included Sam Farha, Layne Flack, "Minneapolis" Jim Meehan, Michael "The Grinder" Mizrachi, Barbara Enright, Kirill Gerasimov (who wins the bad beat of the day award for having his Aces cracked by Kings for a huge pot, and all his money), Clonie Gowan, Gavin Smith, and Young Phan.

Besides Raymer, a few notables such as Phil Ivey (currently 7th in chips), Howard Lederer, Mike Matusow, Can Kim Hua, John Juanda, Kenna James, Lee Watkinson, Joe Beevers, and Paul Darden all still have a chance. Today will be the real moving day, where the huge stacks set themselves up for a run, and the ones who can't hang on will go home. Complete chip counts are below. See you tomorrow.

Greg "Fossil Man" Raymer $1,064,000 in chips
Rodney Pardey Jr. $1,041,000
Brad Kondracki $962,500
Johnny Howard $910,500
Bob Larsen $796,500
Tim Phan $746,000
Phil Ivey $722,500
Steve Marx $679,500
S Bartholomew $659,000
Gabe Wells $655,500
Bryan Stelbuger $648,500
Oskar Silow $638,000
Bob Hotchandani $627,500
Raymi Sanchez Thorn $595,500
Manelic Minaya $594,500
Tex Barch $590,000
Jon Lane $585,000
James Ocson $583,000
David Bergsdorf $579,500
Tom Sartori $574,500
James Pollack $557,500
Karlo Lopez $556,500
Terry Burt $550,500
Joe Berry $542,500
James Buff $542,500
Minh Ly $530,250
Casper Christensen $525,500
Thomas A Roupe $525,000
Gregory Rice $523,000
Aaron Kanter $503,500
Howard Lederer $496,500
Matt Fitzpatrick $490,500
Randal Brooks $490,000
Jon Kalmar $469,500
Hung La $467,000
Nick Gibson $466,000
Nani Awad $460,500
Hunter Pappas $455,500
Mike Matusow $454,000
Sean Daulat $452,500
John McGrane $452,500
Nani Dollison $448,500
Tiffany Williamson $441,000
Mark Forrester $440,000
Yomtov Shabot $427,000
Samir Shakhtoor $414,000
Russell Salzer $412,500
Chris Short $411,500
Can Hua $404,000
Krystal Nelson $395,000
Espen Saltnes $388,000
Marcello Del Grosso $386,500
Kevin Kim $384,500
George Kelly Dickson $377,000
Scott Numoto $376,500
Larry Prugh $372,500
Carmen Menechella $370,000
Russ Hamilton $365,000
John Juanda $354,000
Jose M Rodriguez $352,500
Nick Camarts $348,500
Ron Ware $345,000
David Plastik $342,500
Franklin Caldwell $339,000
Alex Morales $337,500
Sarah Bilney $332,500
Bobby Law $325,500
Jarl Lindholt Joergensen $320,500
Yakov Hirsch $316,500
Tuan Vu $316,500
Chris Drozdowski $315,000
Tom Shaneberger $309,000
Michael Kessler $297,500
Roland Israelashvizi $289,000
Kenna James $287,500
Michael Cribb $282,500
Rafael "Ralph" Perry $282,000
Daniel Shak $280,500
Jason Lester $280,000
Jason Kaplan $274,500
Bing Wang $272,500
Gen Watamabe $271,000
David Richardson $269,500
Terry Myers $269,000
Bjorn Lindenberg $265,500
Tony Pirone $265,500
Patrick Madden $265,000
Paul Vicary $265,000
Scott Lazar $264,500
Niklas Flisberg $260,000
Robert Turner $260,000
Darryl Tennefos $259,500
JC Tran $259,500
Andrew Black $257,000
Bryant King $253,500
Kevin McCarthy $251,000
Joe Stillman $249,500
Joe Simmons $245,000
Shahram Sheikhan $243,000
Paul Mannetta $240,000
Tony Abesamis $237,500
Francis W O'Brien $234,000
Patrick Hayden $233,000
Joseph Hachem $231,000
Erick Richardson $227,000
Josh Prager $225,000
Mark Cole $224,500
Joe Connor $224,000
Mitchell Klein $219,500
Daniel Alaei $219,000
Alan Singer $217,000
Jack Ward $207,500
Webber Kang $206,300
Kevin Wright $202,000
Richard Lapwood $202,000
Richard Kirsch $200,500
Conor Tate $200,000
Dennis Savelkoul $197,500
Anthony Laughing, Jr $192,500
Kelly Zoudo $192,500
Dmitriy Eidelman $189,500
David Steirman $181,500
Lee Watkinson $181,000
Joe Toth $180,500
Stephen Deetz $180,000
Derek Dix $178,500
Joseph Chiosie $178,000
Anthony Hill $173,000
Joe Beevers $173,000
Louie Calvo $170,500
Vadim Shlez $170,500
Louis Lo $169,500
Michaey Leahy $169,000
Adam Friedman $166,000
Dietrich Alex $159,500
Cliff Cantor $159,000
Radu Butan $158,500
Mark Graves $154,000
Mike May $153,500
Kit Phaphon $150,500
Jake Minter $146,500
Glyn Banks $144,500
Bernard Lee $143,000
Peter Hedlund $141,500
Mehrdad Yousefzadeh $136,500
Kevin O'Brien $136,500
Tom Koral $132,000
Steven Dannenmann, CPA $131,000
Per Hildebrand $131,000
Farzad Bonyadi $129,500
Dustin "Neverwin" Woolf $127,000
Tom Pniak $126,500
Alejandro Pachero $126,500
Chris Podlewski $126,000
Babak Rozi $123,000
Kevin Kaikko $122,000
Mark Tenner $112,000
Paul Fisher $110,000
Ayhan Alsancak $109,500
Mark Bryan $109,000
Amit Sander $109,000
Michael P Mollay $104,500
Kjetil Praesttun $102,000
Tom Clark $94,500
Dutch Boyd $92,000
Joe Leibman $88,000
Sean Blanton $87,000
Adam Brosius $86,500
John R "TBR" Brown $85,500
Joseph Vannata $84,500
Matt Fitzgerald $81,500
Michael Capener $80,000
George Thomas Huber $73,000
Doug Gehring $73,000
Martin Cedercrantz $71,500
Frank Hernandez $67,000
Jon Hoellein $63,500
Mike Wattel $62,500
Paul L Darden, Jr. $60,000
Jeffrey Geiger $48,000
Tom Drotleff $41,500
Brett Wiesner $36,000
Ed Pellegrini $23,500
John McLaughlin $16,500
Imad Samouna $7,400

  door: 2005-07-15 14:46:52

World Series of Poker - Order of Finish after Day Three

July 12, 2005
John Caldwell
2005 WSOP Main Event List of Finishers

Here is a complete list of the people who have made the money, their final finishing order, and the amount of money they made. At the end of day three, 185 players remain alive, and all of their names can be found in the day three recap.

186th place James Barber $39,075
187. Cliff Pappas $39,075
188. Gregory Fondacaro $39,075
189. Joel Merwick $39,075
190. Daniel Quach $39,075
191. James Peero $39,075
192. Phoung D Tran $39,075
193. David Rheem $39,075
194. Layne Flack $39,075
195. James Meehan $39,075
196. Denis Ethier $39,075
197. Gang Huang $39,075
198. Jani Sointula $39,075
199. Ross Mallor $39,075
200. Andreas Oskarsson $39,075
201. David Silverman $33,197
202. Neil Channing $33,197
203. Per Mikael Hogbom $33,197
204. Christopher Bush $33,197
205. Chris Stull $33,197
206. Tuyen Luong $33,197
207. Joshua Ewing $33,197
208. Jefferey Taylor $33,197
209. Daniel Burns $33,197
210. Samuel Ling $33,197
211. Graeme Harrison $33,197
212. Dennis Orr $33,197
213. Leandro Alvarez $33,197
214. James Pittman $33,197
215. Renee Wexler $33,197
216. Scott Bohlman $33,197
217. Edgar Skjervold $33,197
218. Jenes Voertmann $33,197
219. Garry Bush $33,197
220. Aaron Kline $33,197
221. Thomas Vinas $33,197
222. Mark Napolitano $33,197
223. Sarah Casey $33,197
224. Alen Patatanyan $33,197
225. Eric Mifune $33,197
226. Thomas Madsen $33,197
227. Daniel Grolemund $33,197
228. Jesse Martin $33,197
229. Salvadore Cataldo $33,197
230. Michael "The Grinder" Mizrachi $33,197
231. Michael Davis $28,375
232. Chris Leggett $28,375
233. Rehne Pederson $28,375
234. Emanuel Failla $28,375
235. John Falconer $28,375
236. Mats Rahmn $28,375
237. Michael O'Malley $28,375
238. Olga Varkonyi $28,375
239. Daniel Cormier $28,375
240. Michael W Chow $28,375
241. Edouart Cardona $28,375
242. Joseph Chee $28,375
243. Jesus Abreu $28,375
244. Gregory D Blau $28,375
245. Shun Tang Tsai $28,375
246. David Icke $28,375
247. John Roh $28,375
248. Martin Morales $28,375
249. William Borsellino $28,375
250. Ugur Mehmet Marmangoz $28,375
251. Jack Eachus $28,375
252. Sol Bergren $28,375
253. Patrick Poels $28,375
254. Thomas Lock $28,375
255. Dat Thien Ly $28,375
256. Harry Varisco $28,375
257. David Claiborne $28,375
258. Norbert Holeting $28,375
259. John Hutchinson $28,375
260. Hung M Tran $28,375
261. Corlan China $24,365
262. Kevin M Mason $24,365
263. Carl Olson $24,365
264. Alan Colon $24,365
265. Barry Neville $24,365
266. Anders Rosander $24,365
267. Eamon Grimes $24,365
268. Nathan Kent $24,365
269. Stephen Allen $24,365
270. William McKinney $24,365
271. Anthony Argila $24,365
272. Marcello Colosimo $24,365
273. Champie Douglas $24,365
274. Jean-Philippe Piquette $24,365
275. Pete Lawson $24,365
276. Robert Ciaffone $24,365
277. Douglas Morgan $24,365
278. William Mkamarek $24,365
279. James Jordan Jr $24,365
280. Leonard Feinzoig $24,365
281. Russell Prentice $24,365
282. Anahit Galajian $24,365
283. Robert Fikac $24,365
284. Eric Miller $24,365
285. Ryan Del Porter $24,365
286. Barbara Enright $24,365
287. Yong In Pak $24,365
288. Andrew Parker $24,365
289. John Parker $24,365
290. David Zeitlan $24,365
291. Jerri Thomas $24,365
292. Peter Campo $24,365
293. Farzad Rouhani $24,365
294. Andrew Barrett $24,365
295. Christopher Hamlyn $24,365
296. Iwan Jones $24,365
297. John Letts $24,365
298. Jay Goldenberg $24,365
299. William Frymer $24,365
300. Klaus Agesen $24,365
301. Paul Zimbler $21,070
302. Corey Cheresnick $21,070
303. David Mogard $21,070
304. Michael Lesle $21,070
305. Aram Zerounian $21,070
306. Tim Gillig $21,070
307. Robert Chasen $21,070
308. Laurent Wigniec $21,070
309. Daniel Sallam $21,070
310. Jason Akau $21,070
311. James Sabinas $21,070
312. Jeffrey Flannery $21,070
313. Kirk Schnerder $21,070
314. Hakan Waerstad $21,070
315. Michael W Deubel $21,070
316. Sammy Farha $21,070
317. Thuan Hu Bui $21,070
318. Duncan Bell $21,070
319. Kenneth Gregerson $21,070
320. Phillip Campbell $21,070
321. David Hickman $21,070
322. Jon Smith $21,070
323. Richard Lowe $21,070
324. Robert O'Brien $21,070
325. Anthony Williams $21,070
326. Matthew Turner $21,070
327. Jared Gilpin $21,070
328. Adam Joens $21,070
329. William Derrick $21,070
330. Jon Finkel $21,070
331. Russell Barnes $21,070
332. Matthew Hilger $21,070
333. Brad Opsahl $21,070
334. Andrew Neister $21,070
335. Gregory Arnold $21,070
336. Clint Kreitzmeier $21,070
337. Sunny Camper $21,070
338. Frank "Spike" Ballas $21,070
339. Daniel Clegg $21,070
340. Jonah Seewald $21,070
341. Kaway Cheung $21,070
342. Hilbery Shirey $21,070
343. Andrew Wynn $21,070
344. Raymond Yee $21,070
345. Alexander Jagdick $21,070
346. Barry Schwartz $21,070
347. Brian Decatur $21,070
348. Steve Hohn $21,070
349. Fred Badger $21,070
350. Robera Alexander $21,070
351. Joe Capps $18,335
352. Gary Friedlander $18,335
353. Louis Werman $18,335
354. Tuan Ly $18,335
355. Thomas Hammers $18,335
356. Anthony O'Hagan $18,335
357. Mark Galasso $18,335
358. Mark McNamara $18,335
359. Keith Donais $18,335
360. Robert Pearson $18,335
361. Laith Salem $18,335
362. Lee Budin $18,335
363. Stephen Dunphy $18,335
364. Richard Cohen $18,335
365. Michael Reed $18,335
366. Derek Van Damme $18,335
367. Eugene Malatesta $18,335
368. Jose Rabledo $18,335
369. Grant Sbrocco $18,335
370. Richard Tomman $18,335
371. Amir Esfandiary $18,335
372. Bo Sehlstedt $18,335
373. David Cleveland $18,335
374. Cameron Hamilton $18,335
375. Kalee Tan $18,335
376. Craig Crivello $18,335
377. Charlie Morris $18,335
378. Karle Wilson $18,335
379. Kerry Petre $18,335
380. James Overman $18,335
381. Joseph Shaffer $18,335
382. Jeffery Gilroy $18,335
383. Alex George $18,335
384. Matthew Overstreet $18,335
385. Christian Gartner $18,335
386. Daniel Gray $18,335
387. Dalton Polasek, Jr $18,335
388. Tracy Scala $18,335
389. Esther C Rossi $18,335
390. Evan Schwartz $18,335
391. Josef Monro $18,335
392. Bradley M Helm $18,335
393. Conrad Stratton $18,335
394. Christopher Lorenzo $18,335
395. Dennis Longoria $18,335
396. Douglas Carlie $18,335
397. Joe Didonato $18,335
398. Kelly Koon $18,335
399. David Arnold $18,335
400. Stephen Rodenbeck $18,335
401. Michael Murphy $16,055
402. Matthew Parvis $16,055
403. Oliver Fink $16,055
404. Ryan Hughes $16,055
405. Chad Moore $16,055
406. James Feist $16,055
407. CarrolHansen $16,055
408. Justin Yu $16,055
409. Matt Vogel $16,055
410. Michael O'Sullivan $16,055
411. Jason Seitz $16,055
412. Stanley Boralskey $16,055
413. Harold Fitzpatrick $16,055
414. Louis Alderton $16,055
415. Yaron Wasserman $16,055
416. Janathon Shecter $16,055
417. Larry Collins $16,055
418. Michael Padilla $16,055
419. Scott Glaze $16,055
420. Thierry Mulin $16,055
421. John William Hopkins $16,055
422. Michael Davis $16,055
423. Nikhil Persaud $16,055
424. Bruno Pisa $16,055
425. Chris Grove $16,055
426. Matthew Szymaszek $16,055
427. Anthony Fagan $16,055
428. Justin Budwey $16,055
429. Hooman Nikzad $16,055
430. Franco Brunetti $16,055
431. Mike Russell II $16,055
432. John Harrington $16,055
433. Tom Peterson $16,055
434. Robert Jarrett $16,055
435. Jason Levine $16,055
436. Tai C Tran $16,055
437. Kevin Shackelford $16,055
438. Salvatore Calandra $16,055
439. Michael Collins Jr $16,055
440. Christopher Smith $16,055
441. Sergey Feklisov $16,055
442. Casey McCarre $16,055
443. Casey Peters $16,055
444. Kirill Gerasimov $16,055
445. Richard Lester $16,055
446. Mark Hylden $16,055
447. Jeff Dziedzic $16,055
448. Ryan McKinney $16,055
449. Henning Frick $16,055
450. Nicholas Venetia $16,055
451. Adan Naglich $14,135
452. Spencer Thomson $14,135
453. Pat McCann $14,135
454. Matthew Paucher $14,135
455. Michael Vitullo $14,135
456. Tuan Nguyen $14,135
457. Michael Ewals $14,135
458. Todd Bourgacelt $14,135
459. Clonie Gowen $14,135
460. Sean Walter $14,135
461. Quan Tran $14,135
462. Raymond Hanson $14,135
463. Michael Soares $14,135
464. Rueben Peters $14,135
465. Stephen Docter $14,135
466. Juan Raveto $14,135
467. Roger Tichenor $14,135
468. Bradley Craig $14,135
469. Jason Fadness $14,135
470. Charles Waddalena $14,135
471. Gavin Smith $14,135
472. Robert Norberg $14,135
473. Doug Briggs $14,135
474. Allan Rippinger $14,135
475. James Goldstein $14,135
476. Matt Dean $14,135
477. Mitch Schock $14,135
478. Thomas Schreiber $14,135
479. Tyrone Zinman $14,135
480. Howard Mash $14,135
481. Matt Hawrilenko $14,135
482. Jeremiah Vinsant $14,135
483. Bruce Rawdin $14,135
484. Brian Haveson $14,135
485. Kevin Lazzaro $14,135
486. Steven Tague $14,135
487. Francis Harris $14,135
488. Ryan Wimmers $14,135
489. Jean Harlan $14,135
490. Gary Margadonna $14,135
491. Erez Savion $14,135
492. Igor Yanovsky $14,135
493. Jimmy Blevins $14,135
494. Derek LeForte $14,135
495. Grant Rist $14,135
496. Christos Psillas $14,135
497. Jonas Lindlof $14,135
498. Theodore Park $14,135
499. Eduard Scharf $14,135
500. William Walter $14,135
501. Robert Jones $12,500
502. Biagio Desantis $12,500
503. K Angeloudis $12,500
504. Meng La $12,500
505. Berad Rygol $12,500
506. Manuel Sanchez $12,500
507. Corey Mandell $12,500
508. Russell Mohr $12,500
509. Jeffrey Kanow $12,500
510. Sassoon Gavrji $12,500
511. Young Kane $12,500
512. Jordan Marinov $12,500
513. Bruce Hardman $12,500
514. William Flachsbart $12,500
515. Reagan Silber $12,500
516. Matthew Kagan $12,500
517. Ken Justin $12,500
518. Guy Calvert $12,500
519. Bill Phipps $12,500
520. Andrew Prock $12,500
521. Elton Beebe $12,500
522. Panayote Vilandos $12,500
523. Austin Moody $12,500
524. Steven Goldberg $12,500
525. Mike Lawrence $12,500
526. Charles Wey $12,500
527. David Rubia $12,500
528. William Beasely $12,500
529. Scott Clements $12,500
530. Robert Atkinson $12,500
531. John Ward $12,500
532. Yan Neiman $12,500
533. Kevin Betsill $12,500
534. Martin Foth $12,500
535. Chris Bane $12,500
536. Troy Wallace $12,500
537. Daniel Piccioli $12,500
538. Vincent Favorito $12,500
539. James Courtney $12,500
540. John Bae $12,500
541. Lee Ford $12,500
542. Sarne Lightman $12,500
543. Thomas Stanek $12,500
544. Young Phan $12,500
545. Oliver Monteaux $12,500
546. David Taylor $12,500
547. Nicholas Matala $12,500
548. Jalae Henson $12,500
549. Larry McFehee $12,500
550. William Bostley $12,500
551. Duc Nguyen $12,500
552. Andre Fridll $12,500
553. Robert Gentile $12,500
554. Nadav Ravid $12,500
555. Donald Delancy $12,500
556. Robert John Kacher $12,500
557. Sergey Khromov $12,500
558. David Anderson $12,500
559. Martin Laliberte $12,500
560. Frederick Brown $12,500

  door: 2005-07-15 14:47:43

Legends of Poker: Bobby "The Wizard" Hoff

July 12, 2005
Al Moe
Staying busy, and staying focused, is something I admire greatly. One of my college basketball coaches once told me, "Al, you've got to be mentally tough to excel at this game, you gotta focus, man." Alas, he may have been picking up on one of my weaknesses - staying "in the moment" long enough to make excellent decisions. Poker players learn to do this, or they learn to flip burgers.

In the 1970's, every one of the $10,000 World Series of Poker Champions came from the south, and most of those were from Texas. It must have been something in the water down there. Like Doyle Brunson, Sailor Roberts and Jack Straus, Bobby Hoff was a college athlete in the 1950's. Fresh out of Victoria, Texas, Bobby won a golf scholarship to play for the University of Texas in 1958, but like his fellow Texans, he found that poker was easy - and lucrative. And like so many other players, he was certain that he was a terrific poker player. Golf fell by the wayside.

Bobby realized he wasn't quite as good a poker player when he stepped foot off the University, and when his winnings were gone, he got a job as a dealer in a local casino. Each night when his shift ended, Hoff would find a poker game and play until he was exhausted, or his bankroll was.

After reading Edward O. Thorpe's book, Beat The Dealer, Bobby and a friend started playing blackjack. They learned the 10-count, and watched as their bankroll rose and fell at the whim of the cards. One night that bankroll reached $10,000, but by morning, Bobby was drunk, busted and disgusted. The same thing happened a few months later in Reno. Up, down, way up - busted.

It's a hard life, living on gambling winnings, especially if you have a compulsive nature. Bobby was able to save some serious money after he forming a blackjack team with a well-staked player from Corpus Christi, Texas. After nearly five years of play, the team found it all but impossible to get a decent game in Las Vegas (or even Reno or Lake Tahoe), without getting shuffled-up on or being barred.

The Horseshoe Casino in downtown Las Vegas had just put in a poker room, and Bobby began playing seriously again. He ran into some of the better players of the time, and eventually his six-figure bankroll was just a faded memory. Fortunately, his best friend, Sailor Roberts, staked him in other poker games, and Hoff began to beat the local pros.

The games were good, if you didn't mind sitting at the table with players like Doyle Brunson, Johnny Moss or Puggy Pearson. Since the early 1960's there had been an exodus of top pros to Las Vegas (ever since Felton "Corky" McCorquodale introduced the game of hold'em there), but W. C. Fields may have had a premonition about the games when he said, "Never give a sucker an even break," and there were plenty of suckers in those games.

Poker author and professional player Bob Ciaffone, calls Bobby Baldwin "brilliant, a pure player, very polished," and while Hoff says he learned a lot about poker from Doyle and Sailor, but he calls Bobby Baldwin the best no-limit player he ever saw. Baldwin was coming off a win in the championship of the 1978 World Series of Poker when the 1979 series started. After three days of play, the field was reduced to just eight players: former champions Johnny Moss and Bobby Baldwin; and challengers Crandall Addington, Hal Fowler, George Huber, Sam Moon, Sam Petrillo, and Bobby Hoff.

Hal Fowler was the short stack, but it was Baldwin who left the final table first when he flopped a set of eights only to be beaten on the river by trip aces held by Sam Moon. That hand set the mood for things to come.

A quiet public relations expert from Los Angeles, Hal Fowler, began accumulating chips at an alarming rate. His runner-runner flush draw took down a pot; his baby pocket pair tripped on the flop and won; his ace-10 held up for high hand. It was a rush that had started three days earlier.

By the time the play was heads-up, Fowler was taking Valiums like candy, and he was certainly relaxed. He and Bobby Hoff fought for over ten hours, the lead changing subtly every hour or so. Two hands stand out in Hoff's mind from the dogfight. The first saw him with a chip-lead of about $150,000 when he got Fowler all-in with a pair of jacks to Hoff's queens. However, a river king paired Fowler's kicker and won him the pot.

Later, Hoff made a preflop raise with pocket aces. Fowler called with 7-6 offsuit. The flop was jack-three-five, giving Hoff top pair, and he bet half his stack. It wasn't enough to scare off Fowler, however, and when a gut-shot four hit the turn, he took down the rest of Hoff's chips and won the championship.

Bobby found no solace in his prize money of $108,000, and his quest for a gold bracelet still haunts him. He finished 25th in the 1993 $10,000 WSOP final, sandwiched between Chip Reese and Mike Sexton, but his 1979 second-place finish remains his best WSOP performance.

There have been plenty good days since then, and The Wizard continues to play poker in Los Angles and at tournaments across the country. The next time I see him on television, I hope it is as the final player standing at his most recent tournament.

  door: 2005-07-15 14:48:19

Big Time Poker: the Monte Carlo Millions is coming

July 17, 2005
Michael Friedman
Matt Savage With most of the poker world's recent attention focused on the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas, it takes a lot to make waves in the poker community, but this is exactly what the Prima Network are trying to do.

The Prima sites are offering the largest prize pool in the history of European tournament poker at the Monte Carlo Millions. The tournament will have a $3 million prize pool and will give the winner $1 million.

In addition to creating publicity by having the largest European prize pool, the Monte Carlo Millions is one of the most exclusive tournaments in the world. In today's world of cattle-call tournaments, the Monte Carlo Millions is breath of fresh air, allowing only 120 players to compete for the title.

Held at the Sporting d'Hiver in Monte Carlo, Monaco from November 20-23, the tournament will feature some of today's top poker stars. Last year's field featured Phil Ivey, Howard Lederer, Dave Ulliot, Chris Ferguson, Phil Laak, Tony Bloom, Mel Judah, and the Hendon Mob.

A player can earn a seat to the tournament in two ways, by receiving a personal invitation from renowned tournament director Matt Savage or by winning a satellite tournament. And if the prize pool isn't enough to get the poker communities interest, winners of the satellites will be treated like European royalty. In addition to $25,000 entry to the Millions, winners will receive a $30,000 package that includes round-trip airfare for two to Monte Carlo and a five-night stay at the majestic Hotel Hermitage.

"There is nothing comparable to playing poker in Monte Carlo. Monte Carlo Millions puts you eye-to-eye with the best payers in the world, competing for the biggest prize pool in the most luxurious and exciting setting in Europe. It's everything you ever dreamed poker could be, and more," said Matt Savage.

This year's tournament will also be broadcast on television, Last year's Monte Carlo Millions is currently broadcasting on Poker Zone TV (Sky Channel 226 in Europe) and Kanal5 (Sweden and Denmark), with additional broadcast partners from the United States, Canada, and Australia to be announced soon.

There is a bonus for those lucky enough to qualify for the tournament. If they fail to make the final table, they will be able to compete in the consolation tournament. Players will compete for a $250,000 prize pool that guarantees everyone a cash prize.

  door: 2005-07-18 13:07:54

The Poker Counselor's Corner (19)

August 12, 2005
 "Poker Counselor"
 In addition to being a poker enthusiast, gambling columnist, and lecturer, John is a National Certified Counselor (NCC) and practices in his home state of Pennsylvania. He has a Master of Arts degree in Counseling from West Virginia University, and a Bachelor's degree in Psychology with a minor in Sociology from Lock Haven University. You can arrange for interviews, speaking engagements, or ask your question to "the Poker Counselor" at carlisle14@hotmail.com.

I know that I try bluffing way too often. It works sometimes but I get caught once or twice and boom, I'm done. The truth is I love bluffing. Is it the rush or something? - Pauly from Tennessee

Bluffing is truly an art form. You have to combine your read on your opponents with the cards on the board, position, chip stacks, the amount in the pot, the blinds, and so much more. What does not go into the equation is your need to get an adrenaline rush! Don't get me wrong, I am all for having fun at the poker table. When poker starts to become a grind, it becomes more difficult to stay focused and driven. Bluffing just to get a "rush" is not an appropriate way to stay energized and assure fun, though. When you bluff once too often and hit that "boom, I'm done" time, the fun comes to a screeching halt. Most of us find that WINNING is fun. That is usually our ultimate goal. Knowing when and how to bluff will move you towards winning. One of the key issues may be your overall perception of the game of poker. The No Limit tournaments that you watch on television are often 4 day events edited into a single hour of coverage (probably only 40 minutes or so if you subtract the commercial time and "fluff" commentating). Their edited shows make the onlookers believe that poker is an exciting series of all-in's and blatant bluffs. Poker veterans will tell you that poker is much more about monotonous folding, patiently waiting, and then making tough decisions. There is no need to manufacture an adrenaline rush by pushing in bluffs. In fact, experiencing such a rush when you bluff probably produces obvious tells that experienced players will perceive. When you play poker correctly, you'll experience plenty of up's and down's. Wins and losses, good cards and dead cards, bad beats and lucky suck-outs will come your way. It may sound funny to you, but you can have your rush from folding your pocket Aces when your instincts tell you your opponent flopped trips, as well. Overall, though, don't expect sheer excitement with each deal of the cards. If you do, you will be disappointed and make rash decisions to produce excitement.

A poker buddy of mine suggested we video tape our play in our home game tournaments so we can watch for our mistakes. I've never heard of this idea before. Would you suggest it? -PunkPoker from New Jersey

Sounds like a great idea, I'd say. We can learn a great deal if we watch the WSOP and WPT coverage in an analytical manner, rather than just for simple entertainment. The effects could be greatly amplified if you are able to do such an observant role on your own poker performance. Of course, you will not have hole card cameras, multiple camera angles, and cameramen to focus on the action. Still, I'm sure that you would be able to extract a goodly amount of information from a simplistic tape of your own play. Players in all other sports break-down game tape to improve, so why not poker? Aim the camera on your seat area. As you review the tape, watch to see if you are staying focused on hands (even after you fold). See if you are giving off any tells by tipping the strength of your hands, your overall comfort level with your hand, or if you disliked a raise. Also, see if you are showing your intension to play/fold before the action comes to you. I find this to be one of the biggest leaks of information that amateurs exude; they peek at their hole cards as soon as they are dealt and hold the cards/chips in a manner that displays their intensions. Take the time to take notes as you watch, identifying areas where you need to improve. Have your poker buddy watch with you, like a coach and assistant coach with keenly trained eyes. The key is to then enact what you've learned. Make a concentrated effort to fix your mistakes and rely upon your strengths. Perhaps you can break out the camera once again, seeing if you are making changes and improvements.

  door: 2005-08-15 09:17:56

Everest Poker
Speciaal voor echte beginners de lekkerste poker website om te spelen, heel mooi grafisch opgezet, met als grootste voordeel een volledig Nederlandstalige website met een zeer goede ook Nederlandstalige support afdeling en zeer regelmatig grote bonussen. Om te beginnen geven ze je 100 % van je eerste inleg terug wat ons betreft een absolute aanrader en als je er nog niet speelt moet je het zeker doen. Vooral op de zondagmorgen zo rond een uurtje of  9 à 10 is het vreselijk binnenslepen om alle vet beschonken Amerikanen te plukken . Zelfs pokerspelers die vrij nieuw zijn in het spelletje lukt dit erg gemakkelijk.
 

  door: 2005-08-15 15:14:13

Commerce Casino Offers $1.5 Million Poker Tournament
COMMERCE, California – (PRESS RELEASE) -- If Ben Affleck can do it, can you? Winning the California Sate Poker Championship, that is! In 2004, Ben Affleck became the first film star to win a major poker open when he captured Commerce Casino's California State Poker Championship, netting a cool $356,400. It just goes to prove that anyone-film star, construction worker, lawyer or candlestick maker-has a shot at winning this coveted $1.5 million event when the 2005 California State Championship hits the tables on Friday, Sept. 23 at Commerce Casino.

Leading up to the $5,100-buy-in Championship No Limit Hold'em Event on Sept. 23, Commerce will host three weeks of State Championship poker. Starting Tuesday, Sept. 6, a variety of Limit and No Limit Hold 'em, 7-Card Stud and Omaha games are on tap with buy-ins starting at $330. The best all around player will earn a $50,000 bonus.

Slated to compete are Tuan Le, World Poker Tour Champion who won $2.7 million in April, and Scott Lazar, of Studio City, who finished sixth in the 2005 World Series of Poker, and walked away with $1.5 million. Renowned players who have cashed-in at previous California State Poker Championships have included Chris Ferguson, Men "The Master" Nguyen, Kathy Liebert, Chip Jett and David "The Dragon" Pham.

Commerce Casino will also stage a Super Satellite tournament from 11 a.m.- 7p.m. on Thurs. Sept. 22 with a $520 buy-in. Approximately 30 players will earn a seat at the California State Poker Championship No Limit Hold'em event beginning the next day. The events are open to anyone over the age of 21. Competitors do not need to live within the state of California. Estimated total prize pool for the full 20-days is expected to be $6 million.

"The California State Poker Championship has become a major event in the West Coast poker calendar," said Cheri Dokken, Commerce Casino Tournament Director. "It's an opportunity for a newcomer to really prove him or herself against very tough competition, including many of the region's leading professional players. By having a total of 17 events we provide plenty of opportunity for players to grab the glory and enhance their bankrolls."

  door: 2005-08-22 11:20:18

Odds don't look good for area card rooms
LAKE ELSINORE - For nearly four decades, the little card room in Lake Elsinore was the only game in the Inland Empire.

All that changed when Indian gaming grabbed a seat at the table.

And as Indian casinos have grown, card rooms have waned and state oversight has increased.

Yet the Lake Elsinore Casino -- with its Moorish-style sign flanking Interstate 15 that lists its featured card games along with a heart, spade and diamond -- refuses to fold.

"Does (Indian gaming) hurt us? Sure it does," manager Pat Wilmes said in a recent interview as players quietly bet and chips clinked in the background. His thoughts shifted to the Pechanga Resort and Casino, which dominates the area's gaming landscape from 20 miles away.

"They have 54 (card) tables. We have 18," Wilmes said. "We're tightly regulated. They can do a lot more than us."

In 2000, California voters gave tribes a monopoly on Vegas-style gaming in the state.

Unlike card clubs, Indian casinos can offer slot machines and table games such as craps. At tribal facilities, gamblers play against the house. At card clubs, they play against each other, with the house taking a cut.

But Wilmes doesn't complain. Poker is wildly popular these days. The poker and blackjack tables at the Lake Elsinore Casino, as well as the facility's nearly 100 hotel rooms, are frequently full on weekends.

"Right now, business is growing every month," he said. "We're hopeful. We'd like to expand. Every business wants to expand."

The family-owned complex -- which also includes a bar and restaurant -- dates to the late 1950s when it was called the Sahara Dunes Casino. It began in a small building on the property that is now shuttered. Operations shifted to a larger building constructed in the early 1970s.

The business now employs about 150 workers, nearly half of them dealers.

While the Lake Elsinore Casino has held its own, many such operations elsewhere in California have not fared so well.

There were 265 card rooms across the state in August 1994, a time when some lawmakers warned they were growing too fast and should come under stricter controls. The warning came two months after Lake Elsinore residents voted against allowing more than one card room in their city.

Later that year, Canyon Lake residents voted against allowing a card room to open there. Perris voters followed suit a year later.

Pechanga opened its casino in temporary buildings in July 1995. Since then, it has spent more than $300 million on its permanent casino, 522-room hotel, restaurants, nightclubs, parking garages, recreational-vehicle park and convenience store.

There are now 10 Indian casinos in the Inland Empire and four in northern San Diego County. Seven of those casinos have poker rooms. The most recent was opened in May by the Soboba tribe.

Pechanga opened a new poker room in November. It was subsequently named the best of its kind by the Southern California Gaming Guide.

There are now 94 card rooms throughout California, said Anna Carr, a spokeswoman for the state Gambling Control Commission. An Adelanto card club -- the Hi-Desert Inn and Casino -- closed in April 1998 after a proposed city-tax increase.

Carr said she is not aware of any studies that detail the reason for the sharp decline in card rooms over the past decade.

Kermit Schayltz, president of the Golden State Gaming Association, cites tougher government regulations that limited card room tables and implemented a 10-year moratorium on opening such businesses. The moratorium is slated to end in 2010.

Schayltz also blames competition from the state lottery and Indian gaming. He said card rooms face several disadvantages when competing against Indian casinos.

Unlike card rooms, Indian casinos are owned by sovereign nations and do not pay per-table gaming fees or property, sales or hotel-room taxes. The Lake Elsinore Casino pays more than $74,000 a year in such taxes, according to city officials.

Indian casinos pay into a statewide fund that is shared by communities that are impacted by gaming.

Schayltz said members of his association need a level playing field to compete with Indian gaming.

"One of the agendas of our industry is to find some type of parity," he said. "It's always an issue. It's always a concern."

  door: 2005-08-22 11:20:49

In table talk, silence is sometimes golden
There are two opposing views on the effectiveness of table talk.

Chatting at the poker table can give you an opportunity to learn about your opponent's hand. But you run the risk of giving away too much information about your own.

I'm convinced that when used properly — in the right circumstances and against the right opponent — table talk can help you gain enough information about another player's hand that it's worth the risk.

Here are my seven rules to successful table talk:

• Avoid table talk if you are a beginner — If you are just learning the game, don't get caught up in psychological warfare with players who are more experienced than you.
Instead, focus on the fundamentals such as understanding the strength of your hand and what your opponents have.

• Avoid talking to great players — If you are up against an expert, chances are he or she will be able to read through whatever you're saying and figure you out before you get information about that player.

• Do your talking on your own time — If an opponent is studying you, you'd be better off sitting still and staring at one spot on the table. Unless you feel like you can manipulate your opponent into doing what you want, stay quiet.

If you are studying your opponent, and he or she is willing to have a conversation, try asking, "What are winters like in Phoenix?" The way he or she answers that innocuous question might give you just the clue you need.

• Mix it up — I know lying is sinful, but all is forgiven at the poker table. If people start to peg you as a player who always tells the truth or always lies about his hand, then all your chatter will do is guide your opponent in the right direction.
If you want to be a table-talker, you'll need to learn to lie with the same tone, mannerisms and speed used when you're telling the truth.

• Avoid patterns — I can't tell you how many chatterboxes I know who clam up like scared cats when they are bluffing. They continue to yap away when they have a pair of aces, but when they are in jeopardy they suddenly come down with a case of laryngitis.
Don't be that player. If you can't hold a normal conversation when you're bluffing, don't table talk. You'll risk giving your opponents way too much information about your hand.

• Be fun and relax — If you're relaxed when talking to your opponent, you increase the chances of that opponent being the same. And when he or she is relaxed, chances are he or she will be less conscious about what information is given away.
Let the opponent just go through the motions unaware, enjoying your witty conversation, while you drain information from reactions. It's cruel, I know, but oh so effective.

• Manipulate the weak — That doesn't sound nice, but hey, we're talking poker here!
The weak players are the ones you should generally look to exploit with table talk.

Say, for example, you have a pair of aces and want your opponent to call but notice that he or she is about to throw the hand away.

Say or do something, anything, to make him or her reconsider.

Try something like, "Phew! For a second there it looked like you were going to call me."

Hey, whatever works, right?

There's one last thing to keep in mind. At all times, avoid being rude, vulgar or mean in any way. It's unnecessary behavior.

Contrary to popular belief, being a jerk at the poker table does not help your bottom line. People are generally a lot more loose with their money when they're having fun. Make people mad, and all that will do is make them harder to beat.

Bottom line: Tell jokes, not insults.

  door: 2005-08-22 11:21:16

Skill and Luck in the Two National Pastimes
Last weekend I played in a small no-limit hold'em tournament. Thirty-six players put up $2,500, plus $200 in juice. Half the $90,000 prize pool would go to the winner, about $24,000 for second, $12,000 for third, $8,000 for fourth. Everyone else would get zero.

We started with $5,000 in chips. When seven hours later we were down to five players, I had $39,000 of the $180,000 in play. All five survivors had played pretty well and been lucky.

With blinds of $1,000 and $2,000, and $100 antes, it got folded around to me in the small blind, where I found pocket 10's. Since I was out of position, I made a bigger than usual raise to $10,000, hoping to take it right there. The guy in the big blind was the chip leader, with about $90,000. He thought for a couple of minutes before calling the extra $8,000.

The flop came 8-9-2, making my 10's an overpair to the board. Given how long my opponent had taken to call, I'd put him on a medium ace - A-9, for example - or something like J-10. Since I needed to keep him from drawing, I bet my last $28,000 into the $20,500 pot.

That he didn't call immediately made me feel awfully good, so imagine my surprise when he finally called and turned over ... Q-Q. Expletive bleeping deleted! I was dead to the two remaining 10's or a runner-runner straight. The turn card was a queen, which wasn't as bad as it seemed: instead of the two 10's as outs, all four jacks could now make me a straight. But when no jack showed up on the river, I became the bubble boy - finishing one out of the money, the worst of all possible places.

Strong players want luck to break even, in which case their skill will prevail, but it's difficult to put your finger on how and when luck works its magic. Let's look at the stages of fortune in my final hand. I was lucky to be dealt pocket 10's, the fifth- or sixth-best possible starting hand, but was unlucky to have an opponent find queens, especially an opponent with a bigger stack than mine. When being dealt a worse hand would have led to a better result, we say that our timing is off.

I was apparently lucky that the flop came without even one overcard to my 10's, but I was, in fact, very unlucky that the texture of the flop encouraged me to bet into queens. A supremely skillful player would have put my opponent on a bigger overpair, checked, then folded when he bet. My opponent had skillfully trapped me into thinking he'd called before the flop with a much weaker hand than Q-Q.

I wasn't unlucky that a 10 didn't flop; I just didn't get lucky enough. But since the third queen came on the turn, flopping a third 10 would have been very unlucky. I also failed to spike a lucky jack on the river. Getting busted in fifth was sickeningly unfortunate - for me. To the guy who finished fourth, it was worth $8,000.

Let's look at a comparable situation in baseball, since the rhythms of our national pastimes are surprisingly similar. Both are contested 9- or 10-handed but place a huge premium on individual success. (Baseball teams win pennants, but it's the sultans of swing and of K who make the long money.) The tactics of both are dominated by probability, position, stealing and decoys. And more than in most competitions, luck becomes pivotal.

Imagine there are two outs, bases loaded, in a close playoff game. With a full count, Randy Johnson unleashes a nasty slider in on the hands of Manny Ramirez. The dozens of possible outcomes include Ramirez taking a close pitch for ball four - or strike three. The width of the umpire's strike zone is under the control of neither Ramirez nor Johnson. On a perfect pitch, quite a bit of luck is involved in getting, or not getting, the call.

Ramirez could also swing - pull his hands in and skillfully make hard contact, driving the ball a) just over the left field wall of Yankee Stadium; b) to the same spot, where Hideki Matsui makes a "snow-cone" catch; c) inches to the left of that spot, where Matsui gets his glove on it, but it caroms away for a bases-clearing double. The wind, more than skill, will decide.

Or Ramirez could make feeble contact, helplessly producing a) a pop-out; b) a swinging bunt, driving in a run; c) a "duck snort" that falls between Robinson Cano and Gary Sheffield, driving in three; d) a seeing-eye grounder for a two-run single; e) a grounder that Derek Jeter fields easily; f) a foul tip caught, or dropped, by Jorge Posada; and so on.

Poker luck is more egalitarian. The genes of very few of us produce Johnson's nearly seven-foot, left-handed wingspan or Ramirez's coordination and eyesight, but everyone has the same chance of being dealt a timely hand when the money is on the line. Or of not being dealt one.

  door: 2005-08-22 11:21:42

How to deal with blinding-fast games
LAST MONTH, 24 big-name poker players were invited to the $20,000 buy-in Fox Sports Net Tournament in Las Vegas. We started with four tables of six players each with the final six playing "live" on FSN.

The 8:30 a.m. starting time did not agree with the players, who had just spent the month playing at noon for the World Series of Poker. Further, we had to raise the blinds at a fast pace to eliminate players in time for the live part of the show. Still, no one complained - we knew what had to be done, and it was a fun event to play in!

I immediately began playing more hands than I normally would, trying to accumulate chips in the lower limits, knowing the structure was conducive to gambling (playing more weak hands). As I mentioned, the structure also was conducive for super-fast play. In fact, the blinds were raised every 30 minutes!

I began to hit some of these weak hands, and now, it seemed, I had everyone at the table a bit wary of me. They knew that I would call their raises with weak hands and that I was reading

everyone at my table well; this seemed to scare most of them

into playing tighter. After all, why mess with me when I had a lot of chips, I was reading them well, and I was playing hands simply trying to outplay them?

Within 90 minutes we reached the final 18 players, and our table was broken down to make three tables of six apiece. I arrived at my new table in Seat 4 with Dan-iel Negreanu in Seat 1, Johnny Chan in Seat 2, and T.J. Cloutier in Seat 3. Of course, all three are among the greatest players in the game right now. At this point, I had run my starting chips of $20,000 up to about $50,000.

Right away Negreanu and I got tangled up when I put him

all-in for $6,700 with my 7-7 to his 9-9. Negreanu was a 4 ½-to-1 favorite, and his hand held up. A couple of rounds later, with the blinds at $300-$600, I called with A-2. Three other players called, and the flop came down 8c-4d-3s. From the big blind Negreanu bet out $1,200 into the $2,400 pot, and I called, thinking an ace or a 5 would be awesome. The small blind called as well. The turn card was the 5d, making me a straight (5-4-3-2-A), and now Negreanu moved all-in for $14,900 into the $4,800 pot.

After about 30 seconds (I didn't want to call too quickly and scare off the player in the small blind), I called. Negreanu said, "It's about time I hit one of these," as he flipped up 8d-7d. He had top pair, as well as a straight draw and a flush draw. A quick check of my hand revealed a diamond, thus leaving Negreanu with eight diamonds and three 6s, or 11 outs. I had the other 33 outs and was a 3-to-1 favorite (33 to 11) to win the $34,600 pot. Alas, the last card was the 10d for Negreanu to make his flush, ouch!

Another 15 minutes later, Negreanu and I got tangled up again when I moved most of my money into the pot with Ah-Jh before the flop, and he called with A-Q. At this point, he was a 2 ½-to-1 favorite. The flop was 8h-8s-2h, and now I moved the rest in with my flush draw (the pot topped $30,000) and was called by Negreanu (I was now a slight favorite). After a turn card Qs, I was going to win only with a heart on the last card. Alas, the last card was a blank, and I threw my hand in and began to bemoan my bad luck!

When the blinds are raised quickly, you should:

a) play more hands;

b) play fewer hands;

c) show up 2 hours late (like me);

d) all of the above.

  door: 2005-08-22 11:22:13

Oh, Canada - Poker Ads Examined

 The United States isn't the only country to try to keep Internet poker companies from advertising on its airwaves. Canada has joined the U.S. in re-examining its existing laws (Criminal Code) that makes it illegal for online casinos to advertise on television.

Despite poker's surge in popularity and Canadian TV stations willingness to air poker-related programming this year, poker rooms are unable to cash in on the specific target audiences like those watching the World Series of Poker or the World Poker Tour.

According to Jim Patterson, president and chief executive officer of the Television Bureau of Canada, "The Criminal Code makes on-line gambling illegal, period. Promotion of an illegal activity is against the law. We would only give an approval number if there is nothing on that says play for cash and nothing on the site that says you can play for cash."

Online poker rooms have found a way around the laws by taking advantage of a small loophole. Although Canadian TV stations can't advertise poker sites, stations are willing to air "play money" commercials from companies like PartyPoker and PokerStars.

The play sites have similar names to the cash sites, but do not allow cash payouts or transactions. The play sites typically end with .net suffix instead of the traditional dot com site address. Toronto-based internet consultant Rick Broadhead is quick to point out that allowing this practice makes Canadian regulators look foolish.

"They're making a mockery of the laws and the regulations here because what they've found is a loophole to advertise a site that is clearly - in a covert kind of way - promoting gambling with real money," Broadhead said in a recent interview with the Globe and Mail, one of Canada's leading news sources.

Mr. Patterson, who runs Telecaster (Canadian TV station) in addition to playing a role at the Television Bureau of Canada, sympathizes with Broadhead but feels that there are lines regulatory agencies shouldn't cross.

"If the commercial says go to the Interpoker.net and play for free...then there's nothing illegal about that. If a person makes a mistake and goes to another site, its not our responsibility," Patterson said.

Broadhead and his followers believe that ultimately the law must apply to these types of attempts at advertising. "If you want to be consistent in your policy, you need to have a blanket policy that says you don't allow ads whether it involves real money or fake money. I don't see how you can really distinguish the two," Broadhead said.

  door: 2005-08-22 11:23:06

2005 World Championship of Online Poker

  World-class poker is no longer a casino-only phenomenon. Online poker has been chasing its predecessor and is on the verge of changing the direction of the sport by steering it to the sea of internet players. Thanks to PokerStars.com, online poker is set to join the ranks of the world's most prestigious sporting events and give one lucky player a record-setting payout.

In September, PokerStars will host the World Championship of Online Poker (WCOOP) featuring 15 events and a guaranteed prize pool of $8 million dollars. The record prize pool makes these tournaments the defining word in online poker success.

This year the WCOOP will introduce three new events: a No-Limit Hold'em Triple Shootout, a No-Limit Hold'em Match Play event, and a Pot-Limit Hold'em event. Players can also try their luck in several other tournaments like Pot-Limit Omaha, Limit Hold'em, or Seven Card Stud.

The event set to draw the most prestigious and cutthroat competition will occur in the WCOOP's No Limit Hold'em main event. Competition is going to be tough for this $2,500 buy-in tournament. The series finale features the largest guaranteed prize pool in the WCOOP at $2,500,000.

Last year's WCOOP drew over 30,000 players and featured some of the world's top poker talents like Daniel Negreanu, Greg Raymer, Josh Arieh, and David Williams. With a prize pool this big, one can be sure the sharks will be in a feeding frenzy over this record-setting event. Last year's main event paid out 81 places, giving the top six spots over six figures and paid 27 players at least $10,000 each

Last year's winner, Edgar Skjervold, a Norwegian financial analyst, bested an enormous field featuring players from Canada, Denmark, England, Norway, and the United States. This year's field will feature a bigger international contingency since Europe and Australia became poker hotspots over the course of the last year.

If the $2,500 buy-in for the main event sounds like too much, fear not. Skjervold and 20,000 other players qualified for the WCOOP by winning satellite tournaments. In all, Skjervold paid $100 and won almost half a million dollars for 10 hours of work. At $50,000 per hour, Skjervold made quite a profit on his investment. His success story is sure to bring even more competitors to the tables.

When asked how to win the event in an interview for Bluff Magazine, Skjervold responded, "You know, when you're online it's very different than a casino. You see many more games and play many more hands. And for me, the answer is to be patient and calm and play only your best hands. When you play hands, play them aggressively and get the most out of them. Online, patience always pays out."

  door: 2005-08-22 11:23:56

The Bicycle Casino Sponsors the ``Entourage'' Poker Lounge
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 23, 2005--The Bicycle Casino (www.Thebicyclecasino.com) donated poker tables and all the fixings to the "Monkeys In Pants" Emmy event. Held at the luxurious Beverly Hilton Hotel last week, Thursday thru Saturday (September 15th - 17th), celebrities such as Keifer Sutherland, Paris Hilton, Terry O'Quinn and Jose Canseco, to name a few, were pampered and exposed to some exciting new beauty products, clothing lines and gadgets. They were then whisked off to play poker in an effort to raise one million dollars for the "Monkeys In Pants" Red Cross Relief Fund. AOL will be taping the games and airing them online to over 32 million subscribers.

Always the innovators, The Bicycle Casino continues to set the pace for the poker industry by recognizing what needs to happen, not just what's happening now. According to Marketing Director, Kelley O'Hara, "Unless you're the lead dog on the team, the view is always the same. We want to set the pace, not follow the crowd." As charter members on the phenomenal World Poker Tour, the anchor show on the Travel Channel, the Bike continues to align itself with star properties and quality projects. With affiliate members as prestigious as the Bellagio and Foxwoods, the Bike travels with very good company.

The Bicycle Casino brings another unique element to the "Live At The Bike" experience, creating not only the opportunity to watch, but also a chance to play poker for free and win cash. Watch "Live At The Bike" and simultaneously practice your strategies on their free gaming site, www.thebike.com. With software provided by Momentum Gaming, the Bike is the only land-based casino to have their own free gaming site, providing you with the opportunity to learn the game and better your strategies, and giving you a chance to win big for FREE! Win points and redeem for participation in their weekend freerolls, without spending a dime.

  door: 2005-10-25 11:41:28

BHS grad an online poker big-timer
A 2002 Brainerd High School graduate won the online poker game of his life early Thursday on his computer in his college dorm room, securing his spot amongst professional players at the 2005 World Series of Poker in July.

Eric Zard, 21, of Nisswa and a junior at the University of Minnesota, beat out 430 players in an online poker tournament hosted by the Web site, www.bodog.com. While the sports betting Web site sponsors poker tournaments with a $250 buy-in to win a seat at the World Series of Poker, Zard won the top prize in a tournament in which players played with their accrued points, not money.

The Web site will pay the $10,000 buy-in fee for Zard to play in the final World Series event and will give him $2,500 for travel and hotel expenses while in Las Vegas. Zard plans to travel to Las Vegas July 6. The 2005 World Series of Poker will conclude July 15 at the Horseshoe in downtown Las Vegas.

Last year Greg "Fossilman" Raymer beat out the other 2,576 players in the 2004 World Series of Poker, winning $5 million. Raymer, too, entered via an online poker site.

Zard said he started the online poker tourney about 8 p.m. Wednesday, winning with an Ace-Six final hand at 1 a.m. Thursday. By the time he reached the final table, several of his friends were watching him play online from their own computers. His roommate had been watching over his shoulder during the entire game.

"We were celebrating like crazy," said Zard, after he won the game. "We were jumping around, calling people. I was shaking. I couldn't imagine winning that and now I'm going to the World Series of Poker.

It's a dream. I'm 21 years old and in a month I get to go to Vegas."

Zard said he couldn't sleep after the game and had a tough time taking a test Thursday. Zard is majoring in biology with a minor in chemistry. He plans to go to dental school at the university.

"It was a long tournament but it was fun," said Zard. "It was amazing."

Zard said he's been playing Texas Hold 'Em for the past five years. Still, there will be stiff competition at the World Series of Poker.

"I've played a lot of hands online and I feel my game is pretty good as long as I can keep my head straight at the table," said Zard. "I still have a lot of learning to do, but I'm just going to try to go out there and play the best poker I can. If I sit down next to a player like Gus Hansen or Daniel Negreanu it would be absolutely amazing. I'd love to give them my chips. I would love to get taken out by one of them. Who knows, I just want to go out there and have fun just for the experience. I'd love to see how far I get."

When asked what he plans to do to prepare for the Vegas tournament, Zard said he plans to "work on his poker face."

Even if he loses early in the competition, Zard said he'll stay in Vegas and watch the rest of the tournament.

"It's the World Series of Poker," said Zard. "It's a lifetime experience."

  door: 2005-10-25 11:42:58

Peter's Excellent Poker Adventure - Days Three and Four

October 20, 2005
 The Doyle Brunson North American Championship started on Tuesday, but there was still some excitement before the tournament even started. The World Poker Tour held a gala reception to kick off the events of the tournament on Monday evening, even as many still battled their way into the tournament through the supersatellite that was going on at the same time. Held at the Light discotheque in the Bellagio, it was a chance for all to gather and enjoy some time with the legendary Doyle Brunson himself.

The party kicked off at 8PM with raucous dance music thumping across the dance floor, as Doyle held court in a cordoned off section of the club. Everyone enjoyed their time in the club and, as I made my way to pay tribute to the Godfather of the game of poker, it was an enjoyable evening. Although the music was quite loud, making talking difficult, I was able to wish the great player good luck, to which he responded, "I'm gonna need it!" With that, I was able to let Doyle enjoy his evening with the multitude of admirers that were there.

And there were definitely many there. Some of the more notable people joining us for the evening were Jennifer Harman, Doyle's son Todd, recent Aruba Poker Classic champion Freddy Deeb, longtime friends Billy Baxter and Jack Binion and Men "The Master" Nguyen all were in attendance. Even Nicky Hilton made a stop to speak with Doyle (and THAT was a conversation that I would have liked to have been a part of!).

After awhile, though, the poker room beneath us was calling my name. The Bellagio poker room is probably the best one in Las Vegas and, for the entire time of the Festa al Lago tournaments, has been abuzz with a wealth of poker games. You can play from the smallest limits ($1-$2) to the high roller levels and all games are available. Whether it is Limit, No-Limit, Omaha, Seven Card, and even that oddity of all poker games, Chinese Poker, everything is available and the action is non-stop. It wasn't a long wait, either, to get into my $4-$8 Limit game.

In a change to the game I had played at the Wynn the night before, this table was quite playful and talkative. I was able to chat up my neighbor, Dave, whom I learned was a dealer on the World Series of Poker Circuit tour. We discussed many of the things that happened at the World Series this year, tipping dealers and generally enjoying the game along with the action at the table.

If you go into the Bellagio poker room, be prepared to bring your best game. The players there, as a general rule, are quite knowledgeable and will play their hands strongly. While saying that, this doesn't mean they always are coming in with pairs or big Aces. The players are well skilled at playing their position and will come at you. Be prepared to use every bit of your poker acumen when you step to the felt.

It was a good night all around. Beside enjoying a night in the club with Doyle Brunson, I was actually able to make a little bit from my play at the tables. While not a huge win, it was the icebreaker for this trip to Vegas, somewhat lessening the sting of the previous evening at the Wynn! What shocked me the most, however, was upon my departure from the poker room, Doyle Brunson was leaving the party at Light. With a tournament tomorrow, I had figured that he might have been off early to rest. But the Man lasted through a long evening, entertaining his fans and showing why he is one of the greatest legends of poker!

Tuesday was another rainy day in the desert. In fact, I thought at some point that it would be necessary to purchase a boat for my trip down to the Bellagio! The weather didn't dampen the mood of the masses that came to the Fontana Ballroom, which is where a majority of the field in the Doyle Brunson North American Poker Classic would begin play. The main Bellagio poker room also served as space for the remainder of the field.

All the big names were in attendance, including the current Player of the Year leader John Phan, many of the members of Team Full Tilt, David "DevilFish" Ulliot, Kathy Liebert, Chau Giang and many others. There were some unfortunate early victims, including Chip Jett in the early going and Amir Vahedi just before the end of the second round. Giang seemed to be making the loudest noise, as I noticed him on two occasions eliminate opponents from his table while building a nice stack.

The most unfortunate happening was a fall taken by Doyle Brunson himself. The main table is set on the stage of the Fontana ballroom, which is where Doyle happened to be playing. On his way back to the tables, he stumbled and crashed to the floor. Immediately everything stopped in the ballroom as several players, including Jennifer Harman and Freddy Deeb, rushed to him to check on his condition. With a bold smile and a wave of his Stetson, Brunson rose from the floor, to the rousing applause of the room. Doyle also was playing fairly well, with Barry Greenstein and Jason Lester at his table, so it will be good to see if he can continue into the second day.

First days are normally less than exciting, so we'll catch up on more of the event in my next report. We'll also have another trip into the poker battleground that is Las Vegas when I take a shot at the Mirage tournament on Wednesday night. Hopefully my "Excellent Vegas Adventure" will continue to be just that excellent!

  door: 2005-10-25 11:45:23

 
Al het nieuws over poker vindt U op de site Pokernieuws, om compleet op de hoogte te blijven van alles wat er in het pokerwereldje gebeurt.
Over pokertoernooien, pokerspelers, pokersites, live en online poker, teveel om op te noemen.
 

  door: 2005-11-17 15:39:49

Poker World Champion Hachem tekent bij William Morris

 Er zijn dingen aan het veranderen in de poker wereld. De dagen van de met rook gevulde back-rooms zijn geteld gezien het poker naar het voorfront is geschoven door de immense populariteit van het spel. Het is een sport geworden in plaats van een spelletje dat stiekem in achterkamertjes wordt gespeeld.

Er is nergens meer bewijs te vinden voor deze omslag dan het contracteren van Joe Hachem, winnaar van het World Series of Poker main event in 2005, door de William Morris Agency, één van de oudste en meest bekende talent agentschappen ter wereld.

Hachem die zich naast iconen als Eminem, Neil Simon en Michelle Wei heeft aangesloten zal veel voordeel hebben aan het immense commerciële bereik en de marketing mogelijkheden van het bedrijf.

De 39 jarige Hachem tekende bij het 107 jarige management bedrijf ondanks dat hij werd benaderd door poker uber-agent Brian Balsbaugh die onder andere Phil Hellmuth en Daniel Negreanu onder contract heeft. Hij vond dat William Morris globaler opereerde en interessanter voor hem was.

"Het is één van de grootste agentschappen ter wereld. Ze kunnen zoveel deuren openen omdat ze zijn wie ze zijn, en het maakte indruk op me dat ik hun enige poker speler zou zijn." Aldus Hachem in een recent artikel van ESPN.

Sinds hij gewonnen heeft staat Hachem onder druk om uit te vinden welke kant hij moet opgaan betreffende het marketen van zijn overwinning. "Zoveel mensen willen een graantje meepikken dat je de verantwoordelijkheid bij anderen moet neerleggen,"aldus Hachem.

Het perfect getimede tekenen volgt de recente uitzending door ESPN van Hachem's overwinning op de voet. De William Morris Agency gelooft dat Hachem "strong brand value" heeft. "Poker is een geweldige nieuwe sport. Joe heeft een geweldige persoonlijkheid en we denken dat hij een geweldige carrière tegemoet kan zien," aldus Lon Rosen, vice president van sport bij William Morris.

Met een gesloten deal als Poker Stars representative voorziet de William Morris Agency een mooie toekomst voor de Australische superster. "We gaan handelen, merchandisen en publiceren. Poker biedt veel goede zakelijke mogelijkheden," aldus Rosen.

Nu Hachem zich heeft aangesloten bij de vele film, muziek en acterende sterren is de enige vraag die rest wanneer Hachem's eerste film uitkomt.

  door: 2005-11-22 09:36:41

David "DevilFish" Ulliot - "Het" uiterlijk van een gokker

05-11-28
 Hij is een verschijning met klasse aan de poker tafels, maar als je goed in zijn ogen kijkt krijg je daarnaast het gevoel dat hij ieder ogenblik op kan staan en met je op de vuist gaat om je chips zo van je af te pakken. Hij neemt het op tegen wie dan ook waar ook ter wereld. Zijn naam is David Ulliot, beter bekend als "The DevilFish", en hij is één van de beste poker spelers van vandaag de dag.

Hij werd geboren in 1954 in het plaatsje Hull in Engeland waar hij nog steeds woont. Ulliot's poker carrière begon toen hij nog een jochie was. Hij speelde tegen zijn schoolmaatjes en won zo regelmatig dat op een gegeven moment niemand meer tegen hem wilde spelen. Dit zorgde ook voor problemen thuis; na voor de zoveelste keer van zijn vader te hebben gewonnen zette deze hem op zijn 15de op straat.

Hij ging door met kaarten tijdens de verschillende baantjes die hij had, en uiteindelijk trok hij de aandacht van de eigenaar van een lokaal casino die hem vroeg voor zijn casino te spelen. Zelfs daar versloeg hij iedereen tot en met de eigenaren aan toe. David speelde waar hij maar kon, en het werd zelfs zo erg dat "home games" voor hem geheim werden gehouden zodat hij daar niet mee kon doen. Ook was hij niet vies van vechten zoals hij al meerdere keren had gezegd, om als het erop aankwam zijn gewonnen geld te verdedigen.

Gezien hij niet meer kon spelen in "home games" trok hij de wereld van tournament games in om het gemis van inkomsten te compenseren. Zijn eerste succes boekte hij begin jaren 90 in London, waar hij vele championships op zijn naam zette. In 1997 won hij zijn eerste World Series of Poker bracelet met Pot-Limit Hold 'Em in een historische heads up battle tegen Men "The Master" Nguyen. Nguyen was op dat moment favoriet van het publiek, en de menigte schreeuwde en zong in koor: "Go Master!", de aanhangers van David beantwoordden dit met: "Go DevilFish!". Na zijn overwinning eerden de krantenkoppen de nieuwe champion met: "DevilFish verslindt The Master".

Sindsdien heft Ulliot wereldwijd successen geboekt met poker spelen. Het lijkt wel alsof deze stijlvolle engelsman op ieder toernooi aanwezig is. Sinds de wisseling van de eeuw heeft "the DevilFish" in 87 tournooien gewonnen of gecashed in onder andere Oostenrijk, Spanje, Frankrijk, Ierland, Engeland en Amerika. Hij doet het ook heel goed in de World Series; aldaar heeft hij in 18 toernooien gecashed, maar heeft geen bracelets meer gewonnen. Ook heeft hij de World Poker Tour gewonnen in het eerste jaar dat deze bestond. Ook won hij Engeland's "Late Night Poker" kampioenschap, waar hij zijn eerste lof verdiende.

Hij is eigenaar van een juwelier. Zijn naam staat voor een dodelijke Japanse lekkernij. Een passendere bijnaam kunnen we niet voor hem verzinnen.Hij is een agressieve speler aan tafel, en zijn stijl van aanvallend spelen past prima in de tournament wereld. Er is geen spel waar hij niet in uitblinkt, en wordt gezien als één van de beste Pot Limit Hold 'Em spelers ter wereld.

De getrouwde vader van zeven kinderen heeft een volmaakte speelstijl. Hij vind het dragen van normale spijkerboeken en t-shirts aan de finale tafels die hij haalt verwerpelijk, en draagt zelf altijd een maatpak. Hij gelooft dat Poker een klasse spel is en dat de spelers zich daarnaar moeten kleden. Ook draagt hij van ringen waarop zijn bijnaam in diamanten is gespeld, op de ene hand "Devil", en op de andere hand "Fish"!

Ook al is hij al een veteraan in de poker wereld, is daar nog niets van te zien. Hij is nog even snel als altijd. Hij blijft geweldig spelen aan de tafels, en door zijn stijl, het showelement dat hij brengt en zijn charmes blijft hij favoriet bij het publiek, waar hij ook speelt. Wij hopen dat "the DevilFish" nog lang blijft zwemmen in de poker oceaan!

  door: 2005-11-29 16:09:16

Stars' poker game hits town
The global phenomenon has taken the US and Britain by storm. Ben Affleck is among Hollywood stars known to love the game.

SkyCity Auckland last night launched its Poker Zone, and plans to open similar rooms at its Queenstown and Hamilton casinos.

"Demand for poker is huge – our customers want it here," said gaming general manager Greg Hawkins.

The popularity of the game has been boosted by online versions, televised tournaments, and its glamour image. SkyCity is buying into that image, allowing players to wear sunglasses and visors, but only in the Poker Zone.

However, Gambling Helpline chief executive Krista Ferguson said it was exactly that image that could attract young people.

Card-playing was one of the less-harmful forms of gambling, but "it's an entry point to gambling as a whole", she said.

The potential winnings are also a big draw. This year, Australian Joe Hecham collected $US7.5 million ($10.9 million) by winning the World Series of Poker in the United States.

In January, Jamil Dia of Wellington won $1 million at the Australian Poker Championship in Melbourne.

The stakes weren't quite so high last night at SkyCity, where about 20 people turned up.

Among them was Brad Edley, whose interest in the game was sparked by television coverage.

"It's a lot more social than other variations and we've been playing it with mates. I find casinos a bit depressing generally, but wanted to come and see what it was like in this setting."

Another player was Brandon Clarke. He said Texas Holdem was more accessible than other poker games.

"With so many people around the table, and so many options with the community cards, you can almost always guarantee at least one good hand each round, which makes it more exciting."

Players are dealt two cards each from a full deck and must make, and bet on, their best combination of those two and five community cards on the table.

SkyCity has four tables, taking a maximum of 10 players on each.

Stakes start at $2 and players are pitted against one another, with the casino claiming a commission set by the Department of Internal Affairs.

  door: 2005-11-29 16:10:41

Poker's Great White Shark
Remember when the great white shark ate its first victim, how the Mayor of Amityville hushed it up for fear of hurting the tourism business on which the town's economic prosperity depended?

Well, that is what the leadership of the tournament poker community is doing with regard to the risk of scandal posed by undisclosed partnerships among competing players. The future health of tournament poker will be a lot better off if the risk of collusion is addressed openly and sensibly before a scandal erupts.

What is the problem, you may ask? It comes up in different forms. Here are a few examples. Remember that in most poker tournaments today, including the World Series, all the prize money comes from the entry fees (called “buy-ins”) paid by the players. It is not like golf or tennis, where corporate sponsors put up the money that the players compete to win.

Suppose you and I are among 100 players who pay $1,000 each to enter a poker tournament. The total prize money is $100,000, with the first place winner getting $40,000, the second place finisher getting $20,000, the third place finisher getting $10,000, and the rest being divided up among 4th through 9th place. We both realize that short term luck can play a decisive role in how we each fare. So we agree to hedge our risk by swapping 10 percent interests in each other. In other words, I get 10 percent of any prize money you win and you get 10 percent of whatever I win.

Now suppose the field eventually gets narrowed down to three surviving players – you, me and Clueless Clyde. If Clyde wins, one of us finishes second and gets $19,000 (90 percent of the second place prize plus 10 percent of third), and the other finishes third and gets $11,000. But if one of us finishes first and the other finishes third, we get $37,000 and $13,000 respectively. Better yet, if we can knock Clyde out in third place, we get $38,000 and $22,000 respectively.

In that situation, the risk of conscious or unconscious collusion against Clyde is obvious. An explicit understanding could lead one of us to deliberately lose all our chips to the other, significantly increasing the chances that one of us (rather than Clyde) will finish first. Even if there is no explicit understanding to gang up on Clyde, it should be obvious to each of us that it is in our interest to eliminate him first. The result is that we will avoid playing any big pots against each other, and both look for opportunities to knock out Clyde. Clyde is playing against an explicit or implicit partnership, in which we are ganging up on him.

Should it be against the rules for players to “invest” in each other by swapping percentages? How would such a rule be enforced? Most players would agree that as long as the players are putting up all the prize money and are taking all the financial risk, they should be allowed to hedge their risk by taking pieces of one another. But the rules could and should require disclosure, when two or more players with pieces of each other end up at the same table. The other players at the table are entitled to know what they are up against, so they can adjust their own play accordingly.

A more dangerous example occurs when a player is “backed” by other players, meaning that they put up his or her entry fees in return for a percentage of a player's winnings. Again, it is understandable why players enter into such arrangements. It is not uncommon for a tournament professional to spend more than $100,000 in entry fees and living expenses during the six-week World Series of Poker. If you have been running bad and do not have the bankroll to afford that, but are a top player, you may have to sell pieces of yourself in order to compete.

There have been rumors of situations in which top players have sold more than 100 percent of themselves in a particular tournament, and cannot afford to win. They are better off helping another player win, with whom they have swapped 10 percent. With prize money in the tens of millions of dollars, a 10 percent interest can be a significant payday. The temptation to dump off chips (by deliberately losing a big pot) to a confederate could lead to behavior that everyone would agree is collusive and bad for the game.

Again, disclosure would appear to be the best preventive medicine. If everyone at the table knows that you and I have a piece of each other, it will be difficult for one of us to dump off a lot of chips to the other without being discovered.

Who has an economic interest in making sure that tournament poker avoids collusion and public scandal?

# The casinos that host the major tournaments.
# The tournament organizations and online sites that put on the major tournaments (like the World Poker Tour and PokerStars and Card Player Magazine).
# The television stations that pay to broadcast major tournaments (like ESPN and the Travel Channel).
# The commercial sponsors of those television broadcasts.
# The top players themselves, who are in a position to make far more money today than used to be possible when the number of tournament players and the size of the prize pools were a fraction of what they are today.
# The Tournament Directors Association, whose members are responsible for insuring the integrity of the competitions they direct.
# The vendors of poker hardware and software who market their products to consumers, and who have benefited hugely from the explosion of popularity and public acceptance of tournament poker.

Surprisingly, none of these groups have called for a uniform rule requiring disclosure when players at the same table have an economic interest in each other's winnings. Nor have any of the host casinos or tournament organizers or directors imposed such a rule in the tournaments they host/organize/direct.

Indeed, one highly regarded tournament director is rumored to have taken pieces of players who are competing in tournaments he directs! Imagine what the public reaction would be if an NFL head referee agreed with a Super Bowl quarterback that the referee would get a percentage of the quarterback's Super Bowl bonus if his team wins the game.

Every group that calls itself a profession and asks the public to respect and support its endeavors adopts standards of ethical behavior and procedures to enforce them. Tournament poker should do the same, before it is too late.

In tournaments where commercial sponsors put up the money and specific players are invited to compete, the sponsors should prohibit partnerships. If a player violated the rule, the player would forfeit any prize money won and would be barred from further competition in tournaments sponsored by that organization. That should be enough to discourage violations.

In tournaments where the prize money comes from player buy-ins, partnerships would not be prohibited but players would be required to disclose such conflicting interests to the other players at their table. Again, the penalty for violations would be forfeiture of money won, and banishment from further competition in tournaments organized or hosted or televised or directed by the organization imposing the rule.

Recently I discussed this topic with a professional player who shares my view. I was disappointed to learn that he and other players have tried without success to drum up support for such a disclosure requirement. I was distressed to learn that some of the most distinguished people in the poker industry — players, sponsors, tour operators, and tournament directors — have been unwilling to publicly support such a requirement.

They need to learn the lesson that the Mayor of Amityville learned the hard way. Before the conflict of interest beast rises up from the deep and takes a lethal bite out of public support for tournament poker, they should take preventive action.

No one wants to talk publicly about the risk of collusion at the table. But unless industry leaders show some leadership by setting up and enforcing sensible disclosure requirements, a major public scandal is inevitable. With tournament prize pools growing to tens of millions of dollars it is not a question of whether, but when.

  door: 2005-11-29 16:11:27

Students go ALL-INternet
You won't see him checking your ID at Kilroy's for extra cash. You won't see him working for wages at the checkout counter at Target. In fact, you might not see Roger Teska much at all.

That's because the junior biology major pays his tuition by putting in long hours in front of his computer screen. Teska and others like him have a very profitable knack for online gambling.

"Professional card players today can't afford not to play online because there's so much easy money," Teska said.

He estimates he has made about $50,000 since he began playing online poker two years ago.

Many students choose the reliability of a summer job or paid internship as their source of spending cash. Others, like Teska, relish the high-stakes, high-gain potential of online gambling. Teska said his online bankroll has been known to swing thousands of dollars up or down in a single day.

"I make my own hours," he said. "I don't have a boss. It's more rewarding (than a normal job) because generally you know that either you were better than the other player or you got lucky."

Teska is part of a rapidly developing poker culture. Spurred by televised broadcasts of the World Series of Poker, the popularity of online gambling has grown rapidly in the last few years. Partypoker.com, which began operating in 2001, is widely considered the industry leader in both users and profits.

Most sites allow players to gamble for free, or to gamble with their own money for real winnings or losses. Some allow users to gamble at up to eight tables at once.

While some players have struck it rich, the Web sites make the real cash. Sites like partypoker.com take a "rake," or a negligible portion of each game's winnings, to make their profit. With thousands of tables operating simultaneously, the results add up. Although companies are privately held, Web sites that track the industry estimate sites like partypoker.com make millions of dollars every day.

Teska has big plans for his career, as well. He said he puts in about eight hours per day, six days a week. He uses his earnings to pay for his diploma "as a back up." He hopes to one day play in the multi-million dollar face-to-face tournaments he watches on ESPN. In the meantime, online poker pays the bills.

"I don't look at it from a gambling aspect -- it's more of a job," he said. "There was a lot of thrill when I first started. Now, I sit down and I'm going to work."

The most successful "professional" gamblers can qualify for the World Series of Poker, a televised tournament where players compete for millions of dollars. Contestants play Texas Hold'em, a version of poker in which players are dealt two cards and must make the best possible hand by combining their hand with five community cards.

Junior Patrick Posten, who first logged on to partypoker.com in August, said Texas Hold'em is by far the most popular way to gamble on the Internet. Although he said he lacks the startup funding to truly make it big in the online gambling world, he hopes he can work his way up by gradually buying into bigger games.

"Right now, I'm just getting my spring break paid for," he said. "Who knows, though. Maybe one day you'll see me on that TV (playing in the World Series of Poker)."

Posten has made as much as $800 in a single day -- better than any summer job he has worked. But as with any high-risk monetary endeavor, the losses can be just as discouraging, not to mention time-consuming.

"Some nights, I start playing at 10:00," he said. "When I'm up $400 or $500 and I keep getting big hands, I'll stay up until 7 a.m."

To ensure profitability, he said poker players should bet in small increments and wait for a good hand before betting large amounts

Sophomore Sam Bogdon first began playing poker online in high school for fun, but he got serious when he came to IU. But now, after making about $4,000 last year, he said he has retired as a professional gambler.

Many sites boast sophisticated software to ensure game security and to prevent players from cheating, but Bogdon isn't convinced.

"Stuff happens that you would never see happen in real life," he said. "You see ridiculous hands where two people hit four-of-a-kind. I bought a card tracker last year. Because everything is computer generated, they can pick up the patterns. I think it's all rigged."

  door: 2005-11-29 16:13:18

'WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLDEM Table Game Approved
MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 29, 2005--After a very successful field trial at Bellagio, the Nevada Gaming Commission has approved the formal rollout of the WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) table game for use in all casinos within the state of Nevada. Bellagio plans to immediately expand to two tables and the Mirage and TI-Treasure Island intend to debut the game in December.

The WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) game will also be unveiled at the Gold Strike in Tunica, MS, in January, bringing the total number of casinos hosting the game to 10. Other locations include Sycuan Resort and Casino (El Cajon, CA), Agua Caliente Casino (Rancho Mirage, CA), Greektown (Detroit, MI), Ameristar Casinos (Kansas City and St. Charles, MO) and Lac Vieux Desert Casino (Watersmeet, MI).

The WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) table game capitalizes on the power, success and fan loyalty inspired by the WORLD POKER TOUR®, the breakthrough television show that launched the worldwide poker boom. The show is now seen in more than 120 countries and territories. WPT Enterprises, Inc. (Nasdaq: WPTE - News), the entertainment and media company that films and produces the WORLD POKER TOUR television series shown on Travel Channel, has licensed its name and brand to the game pursuant to a licensing agreement with Lakes Entertainment, Inc. (LACO). Developed by David Sklansky, a world-renowned poker expert and author, the table game has been licensed to Lakes Entertainment for distribution.

"We believe that the WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) table game provides players the most exciting table game experience possible, under the premier brand in poker. Wherever it has been introduced, it has become one of the most popular games on the casino floor," said Lakes Entertainment CEO Lyle Berman. "The number one reason that it has proven to be so popular is that it is so 'player friendly.' It's extremely simple--easy to play and to deal."

Lakes Entertainment has continued to add additional elements and refinements to the game to enhance player and dealer experience. It now includes an unprecedented training module for dealers and supervisors.

The game debuted for its initial Nevada trial on April 22, 2005 at Bellagio. Bill Bingham, Vice President Table Games at Bellagio reported to Lakes Entertainment, "The game has been performing above expectations. The interest level has been very high, and the response from the players and staff has been extremely favorable. As you know we positioned the game in close proximity to our Poker Room, and I believe this has resulted in significant crossover play."

That was followed by a report from Jason Pool, Vice President Table Games at Lac Vieux Desert in Michigan, who advised: "I just thought I would tell you about the AWESOME numbers. In the last three months the game has been averaging a hold percentage that is 50% above our projections. Three Card (Poker) doesn't have a chance. Right now WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) is the best game we have in the pit..."

WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) allows poker fans to experience the same kind of excitement that they have been accustomed to seeing on their television sets when watching the WORLD POKER TOUR. Players can strategize their betting and experience the thrill of making an "all-in" raise or a big bluff. Like the No Limit Texas Hold 'Em poker played on the WORLD POKER TOUR, the WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) table game "takes a minute to learn for a lifetime of action" - to paraphrase WPT commentator Mike Sexton. WORLD POKER TOUR ALL-IN HOLD 'EM(TM) is distinctive, however, in that players only play against the dealer rather than against the other players at the table.

  door: 2005-11-29 16:16:03

Beste Pokervrienden en liefhebbers,

Het 1e toernooi van het jaar 2006 zit er weer op met een vol deelnemersveld van 50 pokeraars en 5 reserves die hun plaatsje tevergeefs afwachten want iedereen kwam opdagen, dus wees volgende keer op tijd met inschrijven.
De spelers kwamen vanuit Den Bosch, Leiden, Zoetermeer en het meerendeel uit Haarlem en Alkmaar en omstreken, de nieuwe structuur die Megapoker deze keer hanteerde verliep soepel en voorspoedig , mochten hier nog op of aanmerkingen over zijn, plaats ze op het forum.
Met uiteindelijk 27 rebuy`s en 2 uitvallers begonnen we aan het 5e level, de knock-out fase , FlisT en Peeeedor hadden 20 euro op hun hoofd gezet voor degene die hun eruit zou gooien en dat lukte FlisT werd eruit gekickt door niemand minder dan de Royal Scratch Flush en ook Peeeedor hielt het niet lang vol .
Totale prijzenpot van 1905,- en de 1e cashtafel zat direct vol met de eerste uitvallers.
Onze plaatselijke attractie die Rebecca heet , schoot nog even in de lach zodat de spanning wat afnam en er door iedereen effe gelachen kon worden, voordat de finaletafel van start zou gaan met de volgende deelnemers, Flop Tourist, Deuce,Master,Damnit, Jappa,Red Duke, Elsalvador, en natuurlijk King Arthur en Jan de Snor.
Master die direct All-inn gatt met H/9oc moet het direct afleggen tegen H/10oc van Jappa en wordt dus 9e, Jan de Snor is op dit moment chipleader met 38500 punten in het spel heeft Jan de Snor 7500.
Damnit en Deuce zijn hebben niet veel chips meer dus zullen iets moeten proberen omdat de blinds al op 600/1200 zitten, ook King Arthur snapt natuurlijk als een van de weinige dat het stealtime is geworden en raised naar 3000 en hij pakt de blinds omdat de rest folds.
Elsalvador verkleint zijn stek nadat hij met 4/4 verliest van A/7oc van Red Duke, en Elsalvador heeft nog 1500 over.
Vervolgens doet Jan de Snor twee merkwaardige en vergelijkbare acties door respectievelijk Red Duke en Jappa te callen op middel pair of lager en dat kost hem 80% van zijn stek , met als klein voordeel dat hij Elsalvador meesleept in de malaise en hierdoor wordt Elsalvador e en we zijn nog een plaats verwijderd voor de cash.
Vervolgens gaat Flop Tourist All-in en weer is het Jan de Snor die called, beide A/V alleen die van Flop Tourist zijn van schoppen maar op de flop valt 5/V/V, turn een 3 en op de river een A dus beide full-house.
Het volgende potje gaat Jan de Snor weer All-in en wordt deze keer gecheckt door Red Duke die met A/10oc te sterk bleek voor Jan de Snor die met A/6oc toch een mooie 7e plaats behaalde en dus bubbelboy werd .
Vervolgens wil Flop Tourist (met V/2oc) de blinds stelen en gaat All-in, toch wordt hij gecalled door Deuce (met 10/7oc) die hiervoor ook All-in moet en de flop is, B/9/5 op de turn valt een 2 en op de river een 4 dus Flop Tourist wint met 1 paar en Deuce wordt 6e en verdient 115,-
Met de blinds op 1000/2000 is Damnit verplicht All-in te gaan als big blind en Red Duke called met B/Voc die te sterk bleek voor de 10/7oc van Damnit en Damnit pakt 150,- met de 5e plaats.
Jappa momenteel chipleader en called de big blind van King Arthur op de flop vallen k7/kB/s5 en Jappa raised met 2000 waarop King Arthur folds,vervolgens gaat dezelfde King (met A/10) All-in op de big blind van Flop Tourist, maar Flop Tourist called met 9/9 en op de flop valt er direct een 9 voor Flop Tourist waardoor King Arthur kansloos lijkt en inderdaad de trips van Flop Tourist blijft staan en King Arthur wordt 4e en wint 190,-
Vervolgens probeerd Flop Tourist zijn kleine stek van 5400 te vergroten door wat blinds te stelen en 3 keer op rij lukt dit zonder tegenstoot en de spanning loopt op als je nu iets doet is het verschrikkelijk stom of geniaal als we de toeschouwers mogen geloven, die overigens wel voor een perfecte sfeer zorgden(TOP)
Inmiddels de 3e cashtafel ook afgeladen vol, en vervolgens wordt er aan de finaletafel erg passief gespeeld (Big Blind blijft 3/4 keer staan) en er wordt gezocht naar een opening, en die komt als Jappa de big blind is en Red All-in gaat met waarop Jappa nog maar 2700 hoeft te zetten om een pot van 11000 uit te halen en vervolgens ook deze 2700 zet met 10/6oc tegen de 5/7c van Red Duke op de flop/turn en river valt er A/V/2/9/H en dus de 10 van Jappa is hoog en Red Duke wordt 3e wat goed is voor 270,-
Vervolgens wordt het uiteindelijk ook snel beslist heads-up want Flop Tourist gaat direct All-in met V/7oc en wordt gecalled door Jappa met V/9 en met een 9 op de flop wordt Jappa de 1e winnaar in 2006 van het Megapokertoernooi en wint een prijs van maar liefst 760,-, Flop Tourist wordt netjes 2e en wint 420,-
De cashgames bleven nog even doorgaan en we kijken alweer uit naar het volgende Megapokertoernooi (Shuffle up and deal)



Wist U dat; De Royal Scratch Flush wederom een hoge combinatie wist te bemachtigen tijdens het toernooi en met 4 drieeen een potje uit wist te halen.

Wist U dat; De Cretus de eerste uitvaller van 2006 was op het Megapokertoernooi, maar de cashgames dat volledig goed maakte.

Wist U dat; Onze glimlachende Ier die verschuilt gaat onder de naam nnatnl zijn zakken liep te vullen tijdens de cashgames en meerdere van ons in onze onderbroek naar huis stuurde.

Wist U dat; Rebecca de serveerster wel eens in de slappe lach schiet en dit dan niet helemaal meer onder controle heeft.

Wist U dat; Dit toernooi meerdere malen met A/A verloren is, en we ons afvragen of het nu wel echt zo`n sterke kaart is als ze beweren.


  door: 2006-01-31 10:39:13

5 EURO bij aanmelding. 1 EURO per 2 vrienden. X EURO per bericht.
WORLD POKER TOUR Adds Las Vegas' Tropical Paradise Mandalay Bay to Season V Tour
LOS ANGELES, Jan. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The WORLD POKER TOUR(R) announced today that Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino in Las Vegas has joined its roster of host casinos for a new event that will be staged as the second stop of the Season V calendar. The Mandalay Bay Poker Championship, to be held June 4 - 8, will become the next big event on the WPT's storied 17-stop tour which features exciting poker action at some of the most beautiful, elegant and highly regarded resorts and card rooms around the globe. In Season V, the WPT is expected to surpass its Quarter Billion Dollar mark in prize money!

Steve Lipscomb, CEO and founder of WPT Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: WPTE) said, "This continues to build our solid relationship with the MGM MIRAGE family of destination resort casinos." We have scored a trifecta with Mandalay Bay, The Mirage and Bellagio, the best Las Vegas has to offer."

Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino is a luscious tropical-themed resort. The site's 3,644 rooms and suites include 424 accommodations managed by Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts. The property also has a House of Blues restaurant, concert hall and more than 100 House of Blues-themed rooms, decorated in the unique style for which House of Blues has become famous. Mandalay Bay earned the prestigious AAA Four Diamond Award, and offers two AAA Four Diamond restaurants, Aureole and 3950. The Mandalay Bay Convention Center brings the total meeting space to nearly 1.5 million square feet and is the largest convention center on the Las Vegas Strip. Mandalay Bay's brands include: THEhotel, an all-suite hotel featuring 1,117 luxurious one-bedroom suites and Mandalay Place, a collection of 41 unique boutiques and restaurants. Mandalay Bay is a wholly owned subsidiary of MGM MIRAGE, which also owns and operates The Mirage and Bellagio, two additional Las Vegas WPT casino partners.

In other new developments, Foxwoods Resort Casino, after staging some of the largest events in WPT history, will extend its involvement with the tour by hosting a new spring event, to complement its fall World Poker Finals. The Foxwoods' Poker Classic will be filmed as part of Season IV April 6-9.

The Foxwoods' Poker Classic will replace the PartyPoker Million on the WPT calendar. After several great seasons together in which the WPT helped build international awareness for these now prominent online sites, the WPT will bid adieu to both PartyPoker and Ultimate Bet.

Explained Lipscomb: "We've had a great run with both companies, but the circumstances have changed since we elected to launch WPTonline.com, our own international gaming website. Although they will no longer be on the tour, we continue to explore future opportunities with both of these organizations."

In announcing the WPT's full Season V calendar, poker players may now begin planning their tournament schedules and their shot at the $100 million prize money up for grabs on the WORLD POKER TOUR -- a tour with the slogan "Anyone can play; Anyone can win." In just four years, the WPT has transformed poker into a career destination for touring pros, just like players on the PGA, while also enabling newcomers to get a piece of the estimated $200 million prize money offered over the WPT's four seasons of riveting play. With the announcement of the tour dates, the satellite contact information will also be accessible on the newly re-launched website: http://www.worldpokertour.com/.

WORLD POKER TOUR will once again feature events in Paris and a stellar lineup of U.S. destinations. Season V begins and ends in Las Vegas, initially with The Mirage Poker Showdown May 14, 2006 at The Mirage and concludes April 27, 2007 at Bellagio for the exciting and much heralded WPT World Championship.

The WPT launched the poker phenomenon when it first aired on the Travel Channel on March 30, 2003, and it continues to lead the way in developing poker as a major international sport. Viewers and aspiring tour players can log on to http://www.worldpokertour.com/ for ways to improve their game and to get the latest WPT schedules, information and merchandise. The highest rated show ever on The Travel Channel, the WPT is now seen in more than 130 countries and territories worldwide. WORLD POKER TOUR(R) airs every Wednesday at 9 p.m. EST/PST on the Travel Channel in the U.S.

World Poker Tour Season V Tournament Schedule

Tournament Name Hosting Casino/Location Date

The Mirage Poker The Mirage, Las Vegas May 14 - 17, 2006
Showdown

Mandalay Bay Poker Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas June 4 - 8, 2006
Championship

Grand Prix de Paris Aviation Club de June 12 - 16, 2006
France, Paris

Legends of Poker The Bicycle Casino, August 26 - 30, 2006
Los Angeles

Borgata Poker Open The Borgata, September 15 - 19, 2006
Atlantic City, NJ

North American TBA October 23 - 27, 2006
Poker Championship

World Poker Finals Foxwoods Resort Casino November 11 - 14, 2006
Mashantucket, CT Final Table November 16,
2006

Bellagio Five Bellagio, Las Vegas December 15 - 19, 2006
Diamond World Poker
Classic

PokerStars.com PokerStars.com, January 6 - 13, 2007
Caribbean Adventure Atlantis, Paradise (tentative dates)
Island, Bahamas

World Poker Open Gold Strike Casino, January 21 - 25, 2007
Tunica, MS

L.A. Poker Classic Commerce Casino, February 15 - 20, 2007
Los Angeles

WPT Invitational Commerce Casino, February 21 - 23, 2007
Commerce, CA

Bay 101 Shooting Bay 101, San Jose, CA February 27 -
Star March 3, 2007

World Poker Reno Hilton, Reno, NV March 26 - 29, 2007
Challenge

WPT World Bellagio, Las Vegas April 21 - 27, 2007
Championship

Two additional tournaments to be confirmed at a later date.
ONLINE POKER
  door: 2006-01-31 10:41:39

Login met je punt.nl gegevens om te reageren.
Heb je geen punt.nl account vul hieronder je gegevens in.
Naam:
Email:
Website:
Houd mij op de hoogte:
This editor requires Internet Explorer 5.0+, Netscape 7.1+, Mozilla 1.4+, or an equivalent Gecko based browser. A regular textarea will be displayed instead.

5 EURO bij aanmelding. 1 EURO per 2 vrienden. X EURO per bericht.

Home   weblog sinds: 2005-06-01

Ontwikkeld door punt.nl en gehost door mijndomein.nl